1951年波兰和苏联之间的领土交换:70年来人口发展和定居网络的转变

R. Lozynskyy, R. Slyvka, V. Pantyley, Y. Braychevskyy
{"title":"1951年波兰和苏联之间的领土交换:70年来人口发展和定居网络的转变","authors":"R. Lozynskyy, R. Slyvka, V. Pantyley, Y. Braychevskyy","doi":"10.12775/bgss-2023-0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we present a comparative analysis of the demographic development and changes in the settlement network over the last 70 years in the territories exchanged in 1951 between the USSR and Poland. We found that, within the territory ceded to the USSR, the traditional settlement pattern was restored and the settlement network was renewed up to 90%. Industrialization in the area resulted in the population growth reaching, at maximum, 40% greater numbers than in 1939. The territory ceded to Poland featured a “colonizational” pattern of resettlement and the population size remained much smaller as compared to 1951, directly before the exchange. However, in Poland, local people faced no obstacles to returning to the area. Conversely, the USSR deported most of the local inhabitants to distant parts of Ukraine and prevented people from the neighbouring locations from entering the area. Overall, based on the resettlement policy comparison we argue that, on the part of the USSR, an important rationale behind the exchange was to strengthen totalitarian control over the western regions of Ukraine by means of deportation and population dispersion","PeriodicalId":45441,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of Geography-Socio-Economic Series","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"territorial exchange between Poland and the USSR in 1951: demographic development and settlement network transformation over a 70-year period\",\"authors\":\"R. Lozynskyy, R. Slyvka, V. Pantyley, Y. Braychevskyy\",\"doi\":\"10.12775/bgss-2023-0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, we present a comparative analysis of the demographic development and changes in the settlement network over the last 70 years in the territories exchanged in 1951 between the USSR and Poland. We found that, within the territory ceded to the USSR, the traditional settlement pattern was restored and the settlement network was renewed up to 90%. Industrialization in the area resulted in the population growth reaching, at maximum, 40% greater numbers than in 1939. The territory ceded to Poland featured a “colonizational” pattern of resettlement and the population size remained much smaller as compared to 1951, directly before the exchange. However, in Poland, local people faced no obstacles to returning to the area. Conversely, the USSR deported most of the local inhabitants to distant parts of Ukraine and prevented people from the neighbouring locations from entering the area. Overall, based on the resettlement policy comparison we argue that, on the part of the USSR, an important rationale behind the exchange was to strengthen totalitarian control over the western regions of Ukraine by means of deportation and population dispersion\",\"PeriodicalId\":45441,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of Geography-Socio-Economic Series\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of Geography-Socio-Economic Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2023-0005\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of Geography-Socio-Economic Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/bgss-2023-0005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我们对1951年苏联和波兰交换的领土上人口发展和定居点网络在过去70年中的变化进行了比较分析。我们发现,在割让给苏联的领土内,传统的定居模式得到了恢复,定居网络得到了90%的更新。该地区的工业化导致人口增长达到,最多比1939年多40%。割让给波兰的领土以“殖民”的重新安置模式为特色,人口规模比1951年割让前要小得多。然而,在波兰,当地人返回该地区没有遇到任何障碍。相反,苏联将大多数当地居民驱逐到乌克兰的偏远地区,并阻止邻近地区的人进入该地区。总的来说,基于重新安置政策的比较,我们认为,就苏联而言,交换背后的一个重要理由是通过驱逐和人口分散来加强对乌克兰西部地区的极权主义控制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
territorial exchange between Poland and the USSR in 1951: demographic development and settlement network transformation over a 70-year period
In this article, we present a comparative analysis of the demographic development and changes in the settlement network over the last 70 years in the territories exchanged in 1951 between the USSR and Poland. We found that, within the territory ceded to the USSR, the traditional settlement pattern was restored and the settlement network was renewed up to 90%. Industrialization in the area resulted in the population growth reaching, at maximum, 40% greater numbers than in 1939. The territory ceded to Poland featured a “colonizational” pattern of resettlement and the population size remained much smaller as compared to 1951, directly before the exchange. However, in Poland, local people faced no obstacles to returning to the area. Conversely, the USSR deported most of the local inhabitants to distant parts of Ukraine and prevented people from the neighbouring locations from entering the area. Overall, based on the resettlement policy comparison we argue that, on the part of the USSR, an important rationale behind the exchange was to strengthen totalitarian control over the western regions of Ukraine by means of deportation and population dispersion
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
18.20%
发文量
30
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
What drives them to drive? Mode choice for holiday travel in Poland and its determinants On household living conditions. A comparison between capital agglomerations and their popular neighborhoods in Northwestern Argentina Factors associated with rural aging in Brazilian municipalities: an analysis using quantile regressions Analysis of delays and cost overruns of road construction projects in the Colombian Caribbean Region Recent developments in immigration patterns. A case study in the province of Malaga (Spain)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1