支持超越消费者处方互动的共同决策:CommonGround保真度量表的初步开发

Sadaaki Fukui, M. Salyers, C. Rapp, Richard J. Goscha, L. Young, Ally Mabry
{"title":"支持超越消费者处方互动的共同决策:CommonGround保真度量表的初步开发","authors":"Sadaaki Fukui, M. Salyers, C. Rapp, Richard J. Goscha, L. Young, Ally Mabry","doi":"10.1080/15487768.2016.1197864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Shared decision making has become a central tenet of recovery-oriented, person-centered mental health care, yet the practice is not always transferred to the routine psychiatric visit. Supporting the practice at the system level, beyond the interactions of consumers and medication prescribers, is needed for successful adoption of shared decision making. CommonGround is a systemic approach, intended to be part of a larger integration of shared decision-making tools and practices at the system level. The authors discuss the organizational components that CommonGround uses to facilitate shared decision making, and we present a fidelity scale to assess how well the system is being implemented.","PeriodicalId":72174,"journal":{"name":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","volume":"6 1","pages":"252 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Supporting shared decision making beyond consumer-prescriber interactions: Initial development of the CommonGround fidelity scale\",\"authors\":\"Sadaaki Fukui, M. Salyers, C. Rapp, Richard J. Goscha, L. Young, Ally Mabry\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15487768.2016.1197864\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Shared decision making has become a central tenet of recovery-oriented, person-centered mental health care, yet the practice is not always transferred to the routine psychiatric visit. Supporting the practice at the system level, beyond the interactions of consumers and medication prescribers, is needed for successful adoption of shared decision making. CommonGround is a systemic approach, intended to be part of a larger integration of shared decision-making tools and practices at the system level. The authors discuss the organizational components that CommonGround uses to facilitate shared decision making, and we present a fidelity scale to assess how well the system is being implemented.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72174,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"252 - 267\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2016.1197864\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of psychiatric rehabilitation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15487768.2016.1197864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

共同决策已成为以康复为导向、以人为本的精神卫生保健的核心原则,但这种做法并不总是转移到常规精神科就诊。为了成功地采用共同决策,需要在系统层面支持实践,而不仅仅是消费者和药物处方者之间的相互作用。CommonGround是一种系统方法,旨在成为系统级共享决策工具和实践的更大集成的一部分。作者讨论了CommonGround用来促进共享决策制定的组织组件,并且我们提出了一个保真度来评估系统的实现情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Supporting shared decision making beyond consumer-prescriber interactions: Initial development of the CommonGround fidelity scale
ABSTRACT Shared decision making has become a central tenet of recovery-oriented, person-centered mental health care, yet the practice is not always transferred to the routine psychiatric visit. Supporting the practice at the system level, beyond the interactions of consumers and medication prescribers, is needed for successful adoption of shared decision making. CommonGround is a systemic approach, intended to be part of a larger integration of shared decision-making tools and practices at the system level. The authors discuss the organizational components that CommonGround uses to facilitate shared decision making, and we present a fidelity scale to assess how well the system is being implemented.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Pilot Test of Using Peer Specialists to Deliver Cognitive-Behavioral Social Skills Training. Is Capability to Manage Finances Stable Over Time? Screening homeless Veterans for a voluntary money management skills training program A recovery-oriented peer provider (ROPP) work-role model and prototype measure A qualitative description of community service, business, and organization perspectives on mental illness and inclusion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1