通过需求侧管理使全球电力部门脱碳:对政策应对的系统批判性审查

Q3 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia Pub Date : 2022-04-01 DOI:10.17576/jem-2022-5601-06
Kritikal Sistematik Terhadap, Tindak Balas Dasar, F. Said
{"title":"通过需求侧管理使全球电力部门脱碳:对政策应对的系统批判性审查","authors":"Kritikal Sistematik Terhadap, Tindak Balas Dasar, F. Said","doi":"10.17576/jem-2022-5601-06","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides an up-to-date and comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) of the existing research on long-term electricity decarbonization which is dominated by the global scenarios of Integrated Assessment Models. The aim is to synthesize and extend current understanding on the existing supply-side solutions and demand-side technological options despite the broader range of co-benefits and the latter’s lesser risk. We achieve this by adopting a two-step systematic literature review approach to analyse and review SLR datasets consisting of 103 empirical studies conducted in Asia, Europe, and North America countries in economics and environmental economics from 1994 to 2018 and published in Web of Science and Scopus indexed journals. We find that demand-side policy studies are predominantly carried out in Asia, Europe, and North America. The US contributes more than one-quarter of the studies reviewed, most of which were published after US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Three types of Demand-Side Management (DSM) are identified namely energy efficiency, energy conservation, and demand response policies. The corresponding policy instruments can be categorised into six basic categories. We further found that these instruments are not always implemented for emissions reduction. In addition, energy-saving is found to be the reason for DSM implementation. The findings suggest that demand-side solutions through policies need to be fully exploited to achieve carbon emission targets from the electricity sector or energy sector in general.","PeriodicalId":35929,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Decarbonizing the Global Electricity Sector through Demand-Side Management: A Systematic Critical Review of Policy Responses\",\"authors\":\"Kritikal Sistematik Terhadap, Tindak Balas Dasar, F. Said\",\"doi\":\"10.17576/jem-2022-5601-06\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides an up-to-date and comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) of the existing research on long-term electricity decarbonization which is dominated by the global scenarios of Integrated Assessment Models. The aim is to synthesize and extend current understanding on the existing supply-side solutions and demand-side technological options despite the broader range of co-benefits and the latter’s lesser risk. We achieve this by adopting a two-step systematic literature review approach to analyse and review SLR datasets consisting of 103 empirical studies conducted in Asia, Europe, and North America countries in economics and environmental economics from 1994 to 2018 and published in Web of Science and Scopus indexed journals. We find that demand-side policy studies are predominantly carried out in Asia, Europe, and North America. The US contributes more than one-quarter of the studies reviewed, most of which were published after US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Three types of Demand-Side Management (DSM) are identified namely energy efficiency, energy conservation, and demand response policies. The corresponding policy instruments can be categorised into six basic categories. We further found that these instruments are not always implemented for emissions reduction. In addition, energy-saving is found to be the reason for DSM implementation. The findings suggest that demand-side solutions through policies need to be fully exploited to achieve carbon emission targets from the electricity sector or energy sector in general.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17576/jem-2022-5601-06\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/jem-2022-5601-06","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文对以综合评估模型的全球情景为主导的长期电力脱碳研究进行了最新、全面的系统文献综述。其目的是综合和扩展目前对现有供应方解决方案和需求方技术选择的理解,尽管共同利益范围更广,后者的风险更小。为了实现这一目标,我们采用了两步系统文献综述方法,分析和回顾了1994年至2018年在亚洲、欧洲和北美国家进行的103项经济学和环境经济学实证研究的SLR数据集,并发表在Web of Science和Scopus索引期刊上。我们发现需求侧政策研究主要在亚洲、欧洲和北美进行。在被审查的研究中,美国贡献了四分之一以上,其中大多数是在美国退出《巴黎协定》后发表的。需求侧管理(DSM)有三种类型,即能源效率、能源节约和需求响应政策。相应的政策工具可分为六个基本类别。我们进一步发现,这些工具并不总是用于减排。此外,发现节能是实施DSM的原因。研究结果表明,需要通过政策充分利用需求侧解决方案,以实现电力部门或整个能源部门的碳排放目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Decarbonizing the Global Electricity Sector through Demand-Side Management: A Systematic Critical Review of Policy Responses
This paper provides an up-to-date and comprehensive systematic literature review (SLR) of the existing research on long-term electricity decarbonization which is dominated by the global scenarios of Integrated Assessment Models. The aim is to synthesize and extend current understanding on the existing supply-side solutions and demand-side technological options despite the broader range of co-benefits and the latter’s lesser risk. We achieve this by adopting a two-step systematic literature review approach to analyse and review SLR datasets consisting of 103 empirical studies conducted in Asia, Europe, and North America countries in economics and environmental economics from 1994 to 2018 and published in Web of Science and Scopus indexed journals. We find that demand-side policy studies are predominantly carried out in Asia, Europe, and North America. The US contributes more than one-quarter of the studies reviewed, most of which were published after US withdrawal from the Paris Agreement. Three types of Demand-Side Management (DSM) are identified namely energy efficiency, energy conservation, and demand response policies. The corresponding policy instruments can be categorised into six basic categories. We further found that these instruments are not always implemented for emissions reduction. In addition, energy-saving is found to be the reason for DSM implementation. The findings suggest that demand-side solutions through policies need to be fully exploited to achieve carbon emission targets from the electricity sector or energy sector in general.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia
Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia (JEM) is a Scopus indexed peer reviewed journal published by UKM Press (Penerbit UKM), Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. The journal publishes original research articles as well as short notes, comments and book reviews on all aspects of economics, particularly those pertaining to the developing economies. Articles are published in both English and Malay.
期刊最新文献
Effect of Covid-19 Sentiment on Financial Markets: Evidence from S&P 500 and Bitcoin Does Food Inflation Affect Infant and Child Mortality? Evidence from Indonesia Institutional Quality, Financial Factors and Shadow Banking Income Inequality between Provinces in Indonesia Corporate Income Tax Incentives and R&D Investment in Digital Companies: A New Evidence from China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1