《影子大流行:COVID-19与乌干达的性别不安全》

IF 1.2 Q2 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Gender Technology & Development Pub Date : 2022-06-01 DOI:10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n2a1
Anne Abaho
{"title":"《影子大流行:COVID-19与乌干达的性别不安全》","authors":"Anne Abaho","doi":"10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n2a1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Globally, COVID-19 was framed a security issue and thus response measures were likened to military struggles against an adversary because of its devastating socio-economic effects. Adopting a theoretical tool – securitisation characterised by preventive measures such as restricted movements, closure of public spaces, curfew and social distancing, the approach proved insensitive to gender security. For instance, from heightened use of violence and discrimination to increased economic insecurity and financial distress, men and women have disproportionately dealt with insecurity rooted in social construction of roles. Using secondary sources of literature, the paper exposed how COVID-19 and, consequently, the preventive measures deepened gender insecurity through the adoption of a theoretical tool – securitisation that is gender insensitive. From the reviewed documents, COVID-19 intensified gender insecurity through straining financial and economic conditions; exposure to violence and discrimination; and increased cases of domestic violence. The paper argued that, to avoid entrenchment of the already existing gender inequalities, the securitisation approach must be enhanced with a gendered lens to security.","PeriodicalId":45357,"journal":{"name":"Gender Technology & Development","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Shadow Pandemic: COVID-19 and Gender Insecurity in Uganda\",\"authors\":\"Anne Abaho\",\"doi\":\"10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n2a1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Globally, COVID-19 was framed a security issue and thus response measures were likened to military struggles against an adversary because of its devastating socio-economic effects. Adopting a theoretical tool – securitisation characterised by preventive measures such as restricted movements, closure of public spaces, curfew and social distancing, the approach proved insensitive to gender security. For instance, from heightened use of violence and discrimination to increased economic insecurity and financial distress, men and women have disproportionately dealt with insecurity rooted in social construction of roles. Using secondary sources of literature, the paper exposed how COVID-19 and, consequently, the preventive measures deepened gender insecurity through the adoption of a theoretical tool – securitisation that is gender insensitive. From the reviewed documents, COVID-19 intensified gender insecurity through straining financial and economic conditions; exposure to violence and discrimination; and increased cases of domestic violence. The paper argued that, to avoid entrenchment of the already existing gender inequalities, the securitisation approach must be enhanced with a gendered lens to security.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45357,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Gender Technology & Development\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Gender Technology & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n2a1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender Technology & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31920/2634-3622/2022/v11n2a1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内,新冠肺炎被视为安全问题,由于其破坏性的社会经济影响,应对措施被比作对抗对手的军事斗争。这种方法采用了一种理论工具——以限制行动、关闭公共场所、宵禁和保持社会距离等预防性措施为特征的证券化,但事实证明,这种方法对性别安全不敏感。例如,从使用暴力和歧视的加剧,到经济不安全和财政困境的加剧,男性和女性都不成比例地面临着根植于社会角色建构的不安全感。本文利用二手文献,通过采用对性别不敏感的证券化这一理论工具,揭示了COVID-19及其预防措施如何加深了性别不安全感。从审查的文件来看,2019冠状病毒病通过紧张的金融和经济条件加剧了性别不安全;遭受暴力和歧视;以及家庭暴力案件的增加。该论文认为,为了避免巩固已经存在的性别不平等,证券化方法必须以性别视角来加强安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Shadow Pandemic: COVID-19 and Gender Insecurity in Uganda
Abstract Globally, COVID-19 was framed a security issue and thus response measures were likened to military struggles against an adversary because of its devastating socio-economic effects. Adopting a theoretical tool – securitisation characterised by preventive measures such as restricted movements, closure of public spaces, curfew and social distancing, the approach proved insensitive to gender security. For instance, from heightened use of violence and discrimination to increased economic insecurity and financial distress, men and women have disproportionately dealt with insecurity rooted in social construction of roles. Using secondary sources of literature, the paper exposed how COVID-19 and, consequently, the preventive measures deepened gender insecurity through the adoption of a theoretical tool – securitisation that is gender insensitive. From the reviewed documents, COVID-19 intensified gender insecurity through straining financial and economic conditions; exposure to violence and discrimination; and increased cases of domestic violence. The paper argued that, to avoid entrenchment of the already existing gender inequalities, the securitisation approach must be enhanced with a gendered lens to security.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Gender Technology & Development
Gender Technology & Development SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
12.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: Gender, Technology and Development is an international, multi-disciplinary, refereed journal serving as a forum for exploring the linkages among changing gender relations, technological change and developing societies. The journal"s main focus is on the shifting boundaries and meanings of gender, technology and development, addressing transnational phenomena and engaging in dialogues that cut across geographical boundaries.
期刊最新文献
Gender exclusion in Indonesia’s community-based forest management extension program What agricultural transition means for women in male-headed households in South Asia: an in-depth exploration of intrahousehold evaluation processes Women’s (im)mobility strategies and digital platform adoption: the case study of employees doing desk work in Pune, India Women’s autonomy and old age pension transfer in South Africa Women fish vendors in Kerala, India: an analytical study of access to inputs and services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1