英语学生对同伴反馈的反应与教师反馈对写作技能提高的影响:一项中级学校水平的研究

Q4 Arts and Humanities Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Pub Date : 2023-03-31 DOI:10.5539/elt.v16n4p88
Raghad T. Almutairi
{"title":"英语学生对同伴反馈的反应与教师反馈对写作技能提高的影响:一项中级学校水平的研究","authors":"Raghad T. Almutairi","doi":"10.5539/elt.v16n4p88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Feedback is crucial for assisting EFL writers since writing in English is challenging for them. Although numerous research studies have been done on the usefulness of peer and teacher feedback in EFL writing, studies that show the differences between the effectiveness of teacher's feedback versus peer's feedback and the student's reactions to mixing feedback are generally rare. This study was thus conducted on the peer and teacher feedback and both feedback model in three writing paragraphs for twenty students at an intermediate school in Buraydah, Saudi Arabia, where English is taught as a foreign language. To identify the students' reactions in the pre-post application of the questionnaire and the pre-post test design for one group of students, the study used a semi-experimental approach. The findings indicated no significant differences at a significance level of less than 0.05 between the mean scores of the peers and the teacher feedback. The experiment had success in terms of students’ positive attitudes towards mixing feedback models, the usefulness of peer comments, high percentages of feedback incorporations, and high overall writing scores. Therefore, based on the study results, the researcher confirms the usefulness of mixed feedback and recommends using it to improve student's' English writing skills.","PeriodicalId":30319,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","volume":"22 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"EFL Students' Reactions to Peer versus Teacher Feedback to Improve Writing Skills: A Study at Intermediate School Level\",\"authors\":\"Raghad T. Almutairi\",\"doi\":\"10.5539/elt.v16n4p88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Feedback is crucial for assisting EFL writers since writing in English is challenging for them. Although numerous research studies have been done on the usefulness of peer and teacher feedback in EFL writing, studies that show the differences between the effectiveness of teacher's feedback versus peer's feedback and the student's reactions to mixing feedback are generally rare. This study was thus conducted on the peer and teacher feedback and both feedback model in three writing paragraphs for twenty students at an intermediate school in Buraydah, Saudi Arabia, where English is taught as a foreign language. To identify the students' reactions in the pre-post application of the questionnaire and the pre-post test design for one group of students, the study used a semi-experimental approach. The findings indicated no significant differences at a significance level of less than 0.05 between the mean scores of the peers and the teacher feedback. The experiment had success in terms of students’ positive attitudes towards mixing feedback models, the usefulness of peer comments, high percentages of feedback incorporations, and high overall writing scores. Therefore, based on the study results, the researcher confirms the usefulness of mixed feedback and recommends using it to improve student's' English writing skills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30319,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n4p88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5539/elt.v16n4p88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

反馈对于帮助英语作家是至关重要的,因为用英语写作对他们来说是一个挑战。尽管已经有大量的研究表明同伴和老师的反馈在英语写作中的作用,但表明教师反馈和同伴反馈的有效性以及学生对混合反馈的反应之间的差异的研究通常很少。因此,本研究对来自沙特阿拉伯Buraydah的一所中级学校的20名学生进行了同伴和老师反馈以及两种反馈模型的三段写作,该学校将英语作为外语进行教学。为了确定学生在问卷的前后应用和一组学生的前后测试设计中的反应,本研究采用了半实验的方法。结果显示,同侪平均分与教师反馈的差异不显著,且显著性水平小于0.05。在学生对混合反馈模式的积极态度、同伴评论的有用性、高反馈合并百分比和高总体写作分数方面,实验取得了成功。因此,根据研究结果,研究者确认了混合反馈的有效性,并建议使用它来提高学生的英语写作技能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
EFL Students' Reactions to Peer versus Teacher Feedback to Improve Writing Skills: A Study at Intermediate School Level
Feedback is crucial for assisting EFL writers since writing in English is challenging for them. Although numerous research studies have been done on the usefulness of peer and teacher feedback in EFL writing, studies that show the differences between the effectiveness of teacher's feedback versus peer's feedback and the student's reactions to mixing feedback are generally rare. This study was thus conducted on the peer and teacher feedback and both feedback model in three writing paragraphs for twenty students at an intermediate school in Buraydah, Saudi Arabia, where English is taught as a foreign language. To identify the students' reactions in the pre-post application of the questionnaire and the pre-post test design for one group of students, the study used a semi-experimental approach. The findings indicated no significant differences at a significance level of less than 0.05 between the mean scores of the peers and the teacher feedback. The experiment had success in terms of students’ positive attitudes towards mixing feedback models, the usefulness of peer comments, high percentages of feedback incorporations, and high overall writing scores. Therefore, based on the study results, the researcher confirms the usefulness of mixed feedback and recommends using it to improve student's' English writing skills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal
Brazilian English Language Teaching Journal Social Sciences-Linguistics and Language
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
5
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Review of English L2 Vocabulary Learning and Teaching: Concepts, Principles, and Pedagogy Actual Usage of Machine Translation by Japanese University Students and Verification of Test Results Reviewer acknowledgements for English Language Teaching, Vol. 16, No. 11, 2023 Research on the Promotion of EAP Teachers' Information Literacy under TPACK Framework in the Era of Digital Intelligence Leveraging Artificial Intelligence (AI): Chat GPT for Effective English Language Learning among Thai Students
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1