{"title":"ACT 16.2编辑简介","authors":"Vincent C. Bates","doi":"10.22176/ACT16.2.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This editorial introduction to ACT 16 (2) includes an argument for immanent critique within the MayDay Group or, in other words, it underscores the importance of remaining open to criticism within and/or directed toward the group. This is followed by overviews for each of the five research articles in this issue, a brief discussion of what to expect in ACT through the rest of 2017 through 2018, and expressions of gratitude to all who volunteer their time and expertise to maintaining this important open-access, double-blind peer reviewed journal.","PeriodicalId":29990,"journal":{"name":"Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education","volume":"32 1","pages":"1-5"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Editorial Introduction to ACT 16.2\",\"authors\":\"Vincent C. Bates\",\"doi\":\"10.22176/ACT16.2.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This editorial introduction to ACT 16 (2) includes an argument for immanent critique within the MayDay Group or, in other words, it underscores the importance of remaining open to criticism within and/or directed toward the group. This is followed by overviews for each of the five research articles in this issue, a brief discussion of what to expect in ACT through the rest of 2017 through 2018, and expressions of gratitude to all who volunteer their time and expertise to maintaining this important open-access, double-blind peer reviewed journal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"1-5\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22176/ACT16.2.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Criticism and Theory for Music Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22176/ACT16.2.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This editorial introduction to ACT 16 (2) includes an argument for immanent critique within the MayDay Group or, in other words, it underscores the importance of remaining open to criticism within and/or directed toward the group. This is followed by overviews for each of the five research articles in this issue, a brief discussion of what to expect in ACT through the rest of 2017 through 2018, and expressions of gratitude to all who volunteer their time and expertise to maintaining this important open-access, double-blind peer reviewed journal.