哈桑·哈纳菲对传统神学的现代神学批判

M. Taufik
{"title":"哈桑·哈纳菲对传统神学的现代神学批判","authors":"M. Taufik","doi":"10.14421/ref.2019.1902-02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In the past theological differences have also been responded to the same as those above, there were those who responded normally there were sometimes disputes. Just how should respond to the differences wisely, because the principle of differences in understanding the concept of theology is normal. Hassan Hanafi, a professor at Cairo University, argued that one of his arguments was that he tried to criticize traditional theology which, according to him, was too central to theological theology. According to him, traditional theology is too monotonous, only talking about the affairs of the \"heaven\" even though we live in the world with our fellow humans. So that theology should not merely discuss God's affairs and eschatological matters.","PeriodicalId":55670,"journal":{"name":"AlAraf Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat","volume":"3 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"KONTEKSTUALISASI TEOLOGI MODERN Kritik Hassan Hanafi terhadap Teologi Tradisional\",\"authors\":\"M. Taufik\",\"doi\":\"10.14421/ref.2019.1902-02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In the past theological differences have also been responded to the same as those above, there were those who responded normally there were sometimes disputes. Just how should respond to the differences wisely, because the principle of differences in understanding the concept of theology is normal. Hassan Hanafi, a professor at Cairo University, argued that one of his arguments was that he tried to criticize traditional theology which, according to him, was too central to theological theology. According to him, traditional theology is too monotonous, only talking about the affairs of the \\\"heaven\\\" even though we live in the world with our fellow humans. So that theology should not merely discuss God's affairs and eschatological matters.\",\"PeriodicalId\":55670,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AlAraf Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AlAraf Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14421/ref.2019.1902-02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AlAraf Jurnal Pemikiran Islam dan Filsafat","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14421/ref.2019.1902-02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去,神学上的分歧也和上面的一样,有些人的反应是正常的,有时会有争论。只是应该如何明智地回应这些差异,因为理解神学概念中的差异原则是正常的。开罗大学教授哈桑·哈纳菲(Hassan Hanafi)认为,他的一个论点是,他试图批评传统神学,在他看来,传统神学对神学太重要了。在他看来,传统神学过于单调,即使我们与人类同胞生活在世界上,也只谈论“天堂”的事情。所以神学不应该只讨论上帝的事务和末世论的问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
KONTEKSTUALISASI TEOLOGI MODERN Kritik Hassan Hanafi terhadap Teologi Tradisional
In the past theological differences have also been responded to the same as those above, there were those who responded normally there were sometimes disputes. Just how should respond to the differences wisely, because the principle of differences in understanding the concept of theology is normal. Hassan Hanafi, a professor at Cairo University, argued that one of his arguments was that he tried to criticize traditional theology which, according to him, was too central to theological theology. According to him, traditional theology is too monotonous, only talking about the affairs of the "heaven" even though we live in the world with our fellow humans. So that theology should not merely discuss God's affairs and eschatological matters.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
6
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Denise Ferreira da Silva. Toward a Global Idea of Race A Critical Inquiry into Jürgen Habermas’ Hermeneutical Reflection as a Methodology of Social Science Sebuah Apresiasi terhadap Perubahan Pasal Hukuman Mati Sensus Fidei Umat Katolik di Keuskupan Agung Jakarta terhadap Isu Homoseksualitas pada Tahun 2022 Deconstruction and Religion: Exploring Derrida’s View on Religion
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1