基于场景的基于随机路点模型的MANET中主动、被动和混合路由协议性能评估

B. S. Gouda, Debasis Patro, R. Shial
{"title":"基于场景的基于随机路点模型的MANET中主动、被动和混合路由协议性能评估","authors":"B. S. Gouda, Debasis Patro, R. Shial","doi":"10.1109/ICIT.2014.40","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A Mobile Ad-Hoc Network is a set of wireless mobile nodes that communes with each other without using any dynamic infrastructure, access point or centralized supervision. In Mobile Ad-hoc network, due to mobility of nodes network topology commutes repeatedly and thus, routing process becomes a challenging task. A selection of routing protocols with varying network circumstances are analyzed and presents performance analysis of AODV, OLSR, ZRP, RAODV, AOMDV, DYMO and DSR Routing protocols in different mobility scenarios based on Random Waypoint mobility model in MANET with pause time. In this paper, an effort has been made to compare seven well known routing protocols AODV, RAODV, AOMDV, OLSR, DSR, DYMO and ZRP by using different performance metrics Packet Delivery Ratio, Average Jitter, Normalized Routing Load, First Packet Receive, Last Packet Receive, Total Packet Receive, Total Bytes Receive and Average End to End delay. The comparison has been done by using simulation tool NS-2.34 which is the main simulator, NAM (Network Animator) and MATLAB which is used for preparing the graphs from the trace files.","PeriodicalId":6486,"journal":{"name":"2014 17th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT)","volume":"68 1","pages":"47-52"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Scenario-Based Performance Evaluation of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols in MANET Using Random Waypoint Model\",\"authors\":\"B. S. Gouda, Debasis Patro, R. Shial\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICIT.2014.40\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A Mobile Ad-Hoc Network is a set of wireless mobile nodes that communes with each other without using any dynamic infrastructure, access point or centralized supervision. In Mobile Ad-hoc network, due to mobility of nodes network topology commutes repeatedly and thus, routing process becomes a challenging task. A selection of routing protocols with varying network circumstances are analyzed and presents performance analysis of AODV, OLSR, ZRP, RAODV, AOMDV, DYMO and DSR Routing protocols in different mobility scenarios based on Random Waypoint mobility model in MANET with pause time. In this paper, an effort has been made to compare seven well known routing protocols AODV, RAODV, AOMDV, OLSR, DSR, DYMO and ZRP by using different performance metrics Packet Delivery Ratio, Average Jitter, Normalized Routing Load, First Packet Receive, Last Packet Receive, Total Packet Receive, Total Bytes Receive and Average End to End delay. The comparison has been done by using simulation tool NS-2.34 which is the main simulator, NAM (Network Animator) and MATLAB which is used for preparing the graphs from the trace files.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6486,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2014 17th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT)\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"47-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2014 17th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2014.40\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2014 17th International Conference on Computer and Information Technology (ICCIT)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIT.2014.40","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

移动自组织网络是一组无线移动节点,它们相互通信而不使用任何动态基础设施、接入点或集中监督。在移动Ad-hoc网络中,由于节点的移动性,网络拓扑结构的反复交换,路由处理成为一项具有挑战性的任务。分析了不同网络环境下的路由协议选择,并基于带暂停时间的MANET随机路点移动模型,对不同移动场景下的AODV、OLSR、ZRP、RAODV、AOMDV、DYMO和DSR路由协议进行了性能分析。在本文中,通过使用不同的性能指标来比较七种著名的路由协议AODV, RAODV, AOMDV, OLSR, DSR, DYMO和ZRP,通过使用不同的性能指标,包投递率,平均抖动,标准化路由负载,第一个包接收,最后一个包接收,总包接收,总字节接收和平均端到端延迟。通过主要仿真工具NS-2.34、网络动画器NAM (Network Animator)和从跟踪文件中生成图形的MATLAB进行了比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Scenario-Based Performance Evaluation of Proactive, Reactive and Hybrid Routing Protocols in MANET Using Random Waypoint Model
A Mobile Ad-Hoc Network is a set of wireless mobile nodes that communes with each other without using any dynamic infrastructure, access point or centralized supervision. In Mobile Ad-hoc network, due to mobility of nodes network topology commutes repeatedly and thus, routing process becomes a challenging task. A selection of routing protocols with varying network circumstances are analyzed and presents performance analysis of AODV, OLSR, ZRP, RAODV, AOMDV, DYMO and DSR Routing protocols in different mobility scenarios based on Random Waypoint mobility model in MANET with pause time. In this paper, an effort has been made to compare seven well known routing protocols AODV, RAODV, AOMDV, OLSR, DSR, DYMO and ZRP by using different performance metrics Packet Delivery Ratio, Average Jitter, Normalized Routing Load, First Packet Receive, Last Packet Receive, Total Packet Receive, Total Bytes Receive and Average End to End delay. The comparison has been done by using simulation tool NS-2.34 which is the main simulator, NAM (Network Animator) and MATLAB which is used for preparing the graphs from the trace files.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Android IR - Full-Text Search for Android Impurity Measurement in Selecting Decision Node Tree that Tolerate Noisy Cases A Comparative Study of IXP in Europe and US from a Complex Network Perspective Ensemble Features Selection Algorithm by Considering Features Ranking Priority User Independency of SSVEP Based Brain Computer Interface Using ANN Classifier: Statistical Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1