政治宣传和后弗洛伊德时代的TVPD:广播电视对2020年警务的回应

IF 0.8 Q3 COMMUNICATION Fonseca-Journal of Communication Pub Date : 2022-07-05 DOI:10.1093/joc/jqac019
L. Bernabo
{"title":"政治宣传和后弗洛伊德时代的TVPD:广播电视对2020年警务的回应","authors":"L. Bernabo","doi":"10.1093/joc/jqac019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n After George Floyd was murdered in 2020, U.S. police procedurals faced increased scrutiny with regards to the ideological implications of how police are represented. This genre has historically represented police as the “good guys,” even when they break the rules in their quest for justice, but cop shows face increased public pressure to include more diverse perspectives and stop normalizing brutality. This study examines ten U.S. police procedurals that aired in the 2020–2021 season to investigate how they navigated public calls for police reform. As a cultural forum, contemporary cop shows offered varied narrative strategies and ideological positions as they articulated the problems in modern policing, considered potential solutions for improving policing, and identified impediments to progress. This forum is ultimately quite limited in scope, reinforcing the status quo even as narratives lack resolution.","PeriodicalId":53925,"journal":{"name":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","volume":"39 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Copaganda and post-Floyd TVPD: broadcast television’s response to policing in 2020\",\"authors\":\"L. Bernabo\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/joc/jqac019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n After George Floyd was murdered in 2020, U.S. police procedurals faced increased scrutiny with regards to the ideological implications of how police are represented. This genre has historically represented police as the “good guys,” even when they break the rules in their quest for justice, but cop shows face increased public pressure to include more diverse perspectives and stop normalizing brutality. This study examines ten U.S. police procedurals that aired in the 2020–2021 season to investigate how they navigated public calls for police reform. As a cultural forum, contemporary cop shows offered varied narrative strategies and ideological positions as they articulated the problems in modern policing, considered potential solutions for improving policing, and identified impediments to progress. This forum is ultimately quite limited in scope, reinforcing the status quo even as narratives lack resolution.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53925,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fonseca-Journal of Communication\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fonseca-Journal of Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fonseca-Journal of Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqac019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在2020年乔治·弗洛伊德(George Floyd)被谋杀后,美国警方的程序在警察代表的意识形态影响方面面临着越来越多的审查。从历史上看,这种类型的电影一直把警察描绘成“好人”,即使他们在寻求正义的过程中违反了规则,但警匪片面临着越来越大的公众压力,要求他们加入更多不同的视角,并停止将暴力正常化。本研究调查了2020-2021赛季播出的十部美国警察节目,以调查他们如何应对公众对警察改革的呼吁。作为一个文化论坛,当代警察剧提供了各种叙事策略和意识形态立场,因为它们阐述了现代警务中的问题,考虑了改善警务的潜在解决方案,并确定了进步的障碍。这个论坛的范围最终相当有限,甚至在叙述缺乏解决方案的情况下也巩固了现状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Copaganda and post-Floyd TVPD: broadcast television’s response to policing in 2020
After George Floyd was murdered in 2020, U.S. police procedurals faced increased scrutiny with regards to the ideological implications of how police are represented. This genre has historically represented police as the “good guys,” even when they break the rules in their quest for justice, but cop shows face increased public pressure to include more diverse perspectives and stop normalizing brutality. This study examines ten U.S. police procedurals that aired in the 2020–2021 season to investigate how they navigated public calls for police reform. As a cultural forum, contemporary cop shows offered varied narrative strategies and ideological positions as they articulated the problems in modern policing, considered potential solutions for improving policing, and identified impediments to progress. This forum is ultimately quite limited in scope, reinforcing the status quo even as narratives lack resolution.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
25.00%
发文量
14
期刊最新文献
Two faces of message repetition: audience favorability as a determinant of the explanatory capacities of processing fluency and message fatigue Deictic Strategies in KamaNu and Karimi’s Kimeru Song and Dance Lyrics Digital inequality in disconnection practices: voluntary nonuse during COVID-19 Media stereotypes, prejudice, and preference-based reinforcement: toward the dynamic of self-reinforcing effects by integrating audience selectivity Introduction to the special issue of social media: the good, the bad, and the ugly
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1