减轻风暴对住房破坏的风险认知和经济激励

IF 1.7 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, CIVIL Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems Pub Date : 2020-12-04 DOI:10.1080/10286608.2020.1855429
Hao Qin, M. Stewart
{"title":"减轻风暴对住房破坏的风险认知和经济激励","authors":"Hao Qin, M. Stewart","doi":"10.1080/10286608.2020.1855429","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Mitigation measures such as window shutters can substantially reduce windstorm damage to housing. However, the cost-effectiveness of wind mitigation measures remains unclear when considering influencing factors such as financial protection via insurance, individual risk perceptions and planning time horizons. Economic incentives may also be provided to motivate homeowners to invest in mitigation. In this study, the installation of cyclone-rated window shutters as a mitigation measure for homeowners in Australia is used as a case study. A life-cycle cost analysis in conjunction with a rank-dependent expected utility model are employed to identify economic incentives that are financially attractive to homeowners with different perceived risks and planning time horizons. The effect of home insurance is also taken into account. The results suggest that, as expected, the economic incentives needed to promote window shutters among homeowners decrease with the perceived storm damage risk and planning time horizon. A rebate for shutter installation cost or a discounted insurance premium have been found to be feasible economic incentives considering a typical planning time horizon of ten years. Statistical surveys are needed in future work to calibrate the parameters within the rank-dependent utility model to better represent the risk perceptions of different groups of homeowners.","PeriodicalId":50689,"journal":{"name":"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems","volume":"20 1","pages":"1 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk perceptions and economic incentives for mitigating windstorm damage to housing\",\"authors\":\"Hao Qin, M. Stewart\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/10286608.2020.1855429\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Mitigation measures such as window shutters can substantially reduce windstorm damage to housing. However, the cost-effectiveness of wind mitigation measures remains unclear when considering influencing factors such as financial protection via insurance, individual risk perceptions and planning time horizons. Economic incentives may also be provided to motivate homeowners to invest in mitigation. In this study, the installation of cyclone-rated window shutters as a mitigation measure for homeowners in Australia is used as a case study. A life-cycle cost analysis in conjunction with a rank-dependent expected utility model are employed to identify economic incentives that are financially attractive to homeowners with different perceived risks and planning time horizons. The effect of home insurance is also taken into account. The results suggest that, as expected, the economic incentives needed to promote window shutters among homeowners decrease with the perceived storm damage risk and planning time horizon. A rebate for shutter installation cost or a discounted insurance premium have been found to be feasible economic incentives considering a typical planning time horizon of ten years. Statistical surveys are needed in future work to calibrate the parameters within the rank-dependent utility model to better represent the risk perceptions of different groups of homeowners.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 19\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2020.1855429\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10286608.2020.1855429","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

百叶窗等缓解措施可以大大减少风暴对房屋的破坏。然而,在考虑诸如通过保险提供的财务保护、个人风险认知和规划时间范围等影响因素时,减灾措施的成本效益仍然不清楚。还可以提供经济奖励,以激励房主投资缓解。在本研究中,安装旋风额定百叶窗作为澳大利亚房主的缓解措施被用作案例研究。生命周期成本分析与等级依赖的预期实用新型相结合,用于确定对具有不同感知风险和规划时间范围的房主具有财务吸引力的经济激励措施。家庭保险的影响也被考虑在内。结果表明,正如预期的那样,在房主中推广百叶窗所需的经济激励随着风暴破坏风险的感知和规划时间的范围而减少。考虑到典型的十年规划时间范围,百叶窗安装费用回扣或保险费折扣被认为是可行的经济激励措施。在未来的工作中,需要进行统计调查来校准等级依赖实用新型内的参数,以更好地代表不同房主群体的风险感知。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Risk perceptions and economic incentives for mitigating windstorm damage to housing
ABSTRACT Mitigation measures such as window shutters can substantially reduce windstorm damage to housing. However, the cost-effectiveness of wind mitigation measures remains unclear when considering influencing factors such as financial protection via insurance, individual risk perceptions and planning time horizons. Economic incentives may also be provided to motivate homeowners to invest in mitigation. In this study, the installation of cyclone-rated window shutters as a mitigation measure for homeowners in Australia is used as a case study. A life-cycle cost analysis in conjunction with a rank-dependent expected utility model are employed to identify economic incentives that are financially attractive to homeowners with different perceived risks and planning time horizons. The effect of home insurance is also taken into account. The results suggest that, as expected, the economic incentives needed to promote window shutters among homeowners decrease with the perceived storm damage risk and planning time horizon. A rebate for shutter installation cost or a discounted insurance premium have been found to be feasible economic incentives considering a typical planning time horizon of ten years. Statistical surveys are needed in future work to calibrate the parameters within the rank-dependent utility model to better represent the risk perceptions of different groups of homeowners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems
Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
10
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems is devoted to the advancement of systems thinking and systems techniques throughout systems engineering, environmental engineering decision-making, and engineering management. We do this by publishing the practical applications and developments of "hard" and "soft" systems techniques and thinking. Submissions that allow for better analysis of civil engineering and environmental systems might look at: -Civil Engineering optimization -Risk assessment in engineering -Civil engineering decision analysis -System identification in engineering -Civil engineering numerical simulation -Uncertainty modelling in engineering -Qualitative modelling of complex engineering systems
期刊最新文献
Accuracy of stochastic finite element analyses for the safety assessment of unreinforced masonry shear walls Investigating the influencing parameters with automated scour severity detection using Bayesian neural networks Celebrating 40 years of the CEES journal Carbon footprint assessment of maintenance and rehabilitation techniques for sewer systems Systems methods and real world practice – Paul Jowitt’s pilgrimage in his writings for this journal
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1