嵌入性的诗学:库切论贝克特

IF 0.1 3区 文学 0 LITERATURE TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE Pub Date : 2022-09-01 DOI:10.1215/0041462x-10028096
M. Farrant
{"title":"嵌入性的诗学:库切论贝克特","authors":"M. Farrant","doi":"10.1215/0041462x-10028096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:J. M. Coetzee’s 1969 dissertation on Samuel Beckett, which remains unpublished, has been addressed variously within Coetzee studies, but we have not yet appreciated the close relation between this extraordinary postgraduate work and Coetzee’s later fiction. This is partly because Coetzee later distanced himself both from Beckett and from the mathematics important to his dissertation but seemingly at odds with his later creative practice as a novelist. In this essay I provide an account of the literary-critical and literary-historical context of Coetzee’s postgraduate research. Rarely have we seen an instance where one major writer is both a major influence on another but also the subject of that other’s rigorous academic study. From the infertile soil of the field of stylostatistics, this essay aims to trace the unlikely flowering of Coetzee’s doctoral work in his later writings and in the development of what I term a poetics of embeddedness. Coetzee’s early work as a forerunner in the digital humanities, and his writings on form, style, and linguistic skepticism, also shed light on contemporary debates about postcritique and the possibility of politically committed literature.","PeriodicalId":44252,"journal":{"name":"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE","volume":"37 1","pages":"323 - 352"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Poetics of Embeddedness: J. M. Coetzee’s Dissertation on Beckett\",\"authors\":\"M. Farrant\",\"doi\":\"10.1215/0041462x-10028096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:J. M. Coetzee’s 1969 dissertation on Samuel Beckett, which remains unpublished, has been addressed variously within Coetzee studies, but we have not yet appreciated the close relation between this extraordinary postgraduate work and Coetzee’s later fiction. This is partly because Coetzee later distanced himself both from Beckett and from the mathematics important to his dissertation but seemingly at odds with his later creative practice as a novelist. In this essay I provide an account of the literary-critical and literary-historical context of Coetzee’s postgraduate research. Rarely have we seen an instance where one major writer is both a major influence on another but also the subject of that other’s rigorous academic study. From the infertile soil of the field of stylostatistics, this essay aims to trace the unlikely flowering of Coetzee’s doctoral work in his later writings and in the development of what I term a poetics of embeddedness. Coetzee’s early work as a forerunner in the digital humanities, and his writings on form, style, and linguistic skepticism, also shed light on contemporary debates about postcritique and the possibility of politically committed literature.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"323 - 352\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462x-10028096\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"TWENTIETH CENTURY LITERATURE","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1215/0041462x-10028096","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

文摘:J。库切1969年关于塞缪尔·贝克特(Samuel Beckett)的论文至今未发表,在库切的研究中已经有过不同的论述,但我们还没有意识到这部非凡的研究生作品与库切后来的小说之间的密切关系。这部分是因为库切后来疏远了贝克特,也疏远了对他的论文很重要的数学,但似乎与他后来作为小说家的创作实践不一致。在这篇文章中,我提供了库切研究生研究的文学批评和文学历史语境的叙述。我们很少看到这样的例子:一个主要作家不仅对另一个作家产生了重大影响,而且还是另一个作家严格学术研究的对象。从花柱统计学领域的贫瘠土壤中,本文旨在追溯库切博士作品在他后来的作品中以及在我所谓的嵌入诗学的发展中不太可能开花的情况。作为数字人文学科的先驱,库切的早期作品,以及他关于形式、风格和语言怀疑主义的著作,也为当代关于后批判和政治承诺文学可能性的辩论提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Poetics of Embeddedness: J. M. Coetzee’s Dissertation on Beckett
Abstract:J. M. Coetzee’s 1969 dissertation on Samuel Beckett, which remains unpublished, has been addressed variously within Coetzee studies, but we have not yet appreciated the close relation between this extraordinary postgraduate work and Coetzee’s later fiction. This is partly because Coetzee later distanced himself both from Beckett and from the mathematics important to his dissertation but seemingly at odds with his later creative practice as a novelist. In this essay I provide an account of the literary-critical and literary-historical context of Coetzee’s postgraduate research. Rarely have we seen an instance where one major writer is both a major influence on another but also the subject of that other’s rigorous academic study. From the infertile soil of the field of stylostatistics, this essay aims to trace the unlikely flowering of Coetzee’s doctoral work in his later writings and in the development of what I term a poetics of embeddedness. Coetzee’s early work as a forerunner in the digital humanities, and his writings on form, style, and linguistic skepticism, also shed light on contemporary debates about postcritique and the possibility of politically committed literature.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Novel Sensations: Modernist Fiction and the Problem of Qualia, by Jon Day, Stories and the Brain: The Neuroscience of Narrative, by Paul B. Armstrong On the Andrew J. Kappel Prize Essay Lydia Davis’s Grammatical Examples Hegel after Ulysses? The (Dis)Appearance of Politics in “Cyclops” Standard Forms: Modernism, Market Research, and “Howl”
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1