当前的审慎框架能否应对气候风险的挑战?

Q1 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Intereconomics Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.2478/ie-2023-0020
Paola D’Orazio
{"title":"当前的审慎框架能否应对气候风险的挑战?","authors":"Paola D’Orazio","doi":"10.2478/ie-2023-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Climate and environmental issues will likely impact the financial system’s stability as they become more pervasive and tangible. As a result, the appropriate financial regulatory and supervisory measures must be in place. This article discusses the challenges faced by financial institutions and the financial system due to the materialisation of climate and environmental risks and the shortcomings in current prudential frameworks. The arguments presented suggest that if the fundamental goal of the Paris Agreement-aligned transition is to phase out coal-fired energy, reduce oil and gas use, and transform carbon-intensive businesses, improving bank governance supervision and/or fostering climate-related disclosure requirements may not be enough. A critical role is instead played by capital requirements that adequately consider climate risks. Moreover, since microprudential tools are typically focused on direct exposures, they may not be sufficient to address the systemic dimension of climate risks. Macroprudential measures should therefore not be overlooked.","PeriodicalId":35662,"journal":{"name":"Intereconomics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are Current Prudential Frameworks Up to the Challenge of Climate Risks?\",\"authors\":\"Paola D’Orazio\",\"doi\":\"10.2478/ie-2023-0020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Climate and environmental issues will likely impact the financial system’s stability as they become more pervasive and tangible. As a result, the appropriate financial regulatory and supervisory measures must be in place. This article discusses the challenges faced by financial institutions and the financial system due to the materialisation of climate and environmental risks and the shortcomings in current prudential frameworks. The arguments presented suggest that if the fundamental goal of the Paris Agreement-aligned transition is to phase out coal-fired energy, reduce oil and gas use, and transform carbon-intensive businesses, improving bank governance supervision and/or fostering climate-related disclosure requirements may not be enough. A critical role is instead played by capital requirements that adequately consider climate risks. Moreover, since microprudential tools are typically focused on direct exposures, they may not be sufficient to address the systemic dimension of climate risks. Macroprudential measures should therefore not be overlooked.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35662,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Intereconomics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Intereconomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2023-0020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Intereconomics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2478/ie-2023-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着气候和环境问题变得越来越普遍和切实,它们可能会影响金融体系的稳定性。因此,适当的金融监管和监督措施必须到位。本文讨论了由于气候和环境风险的具体化以及当前审慎框架的缺点,金融机构和金融体系所面临的挑战。提出的论点表明,如果《巴黎协定》规定的转型的根本目标是逐步淘汰燃煤能源,减少石油和天然气的使用,并转变碳密集型企业,那么改善银行治理监管和/或促进与气候相关的信息披露要求可能还不够。相反,充分考虑气候风险的资本要求发挥了关键作用。此外,由于微观审慎工具通常侧重于直接风险敞口,它们可能不足以解决气候风险的系统性问题。因此,宏观审慎措施不应被忽视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Are Current Prudential Frameworks Up to the Challenge of Climate Risks?
Abstract Climate and environmental issues will likely impact the financial system’s stability as they become more pervasive and tangible. As a result, the appropriate financial regulatory and supervisory measures must be in place. This article discusses the challenges faced by financial institutions and the financial system due to the materialisation of climate and environmental risks and the shortcomings in current prudential frameworks. The arguments presented suggest that if the fundamental goal of the Paris Agreement-aligned transition is to phase out coal-fired energy, reduce oil and gas use, and transform carbon-intensive businesses, improving bank governance supervision and/or fostering climate-related disclosure requirements may not be enough. A critical role is instead played by capital requirements that adequately consider climate risks. Moreover, since microprudential tools are typically focused on direct exposures, they may not be sufficient to address the systemic dimension of climate risks. Macroprudential measures should therefore not be overlooked.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Intereconomics
Intereconomics Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
66
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Intereconomics publishes papers dealing with economic and social policy issues in Europe respectively in Euroland. The journal consists of the sections editorial, forum and articles. The editorial section contains brief comments on current questions of economic policy in Europe or effecting Europe. In the forum, several authors (researchers, politicians, representatives of trade unions and of employers associations etc.) voice their opinions on one particular current economic policy problem effecting Europe. The articles deal with economic policy issues and trends in Europe. They are mostly written by researchers in economics. Officially cited as: Intereconomics
期刊最新文献
The EU’s Digital Markets Act: Regulatory Reform, Relapse or Reversal? Tomorrow at Work: The Age of Shortages Letter from America: Biden’s International Trade Policy: Déjà Vu, Again Forum Introduction: From Unemployment Struggles to Labour Market Shortages? Structural and Cyclical Risks in Housing Markets in OECD Countries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1