婴儿和成人周期性呼吸的形态学

Zalman Weintraub , Don Cates , Kim Kwiatkowski , Khalid Al-Hathlol , Aamir Hussain , Henrique Rigatto
{"title":"婴儿和成人周期性呼吸的形态学","authors":"Zalman Weintraub ,&nbsp;Don Cates ,&nbsp;Kim Kwiatkowski ,&nbsp;Khalid Al-Hathlol ,&nbsp;Aamir Hussain ,&nbsp;Henrique Rigatto","doi":"10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00249-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>To test the hypothesis that the crescendo–decrescendo type of pattern of periodic breathing is more common in infants than in adulthood, we examined the morphologies of periodic breathing in four groups of subjects: group 1 (<em>n</em>=10, gestational age 30±1 week), group 2 (<em>n</em>=10, GA 31±1 week), group 3 (<em>n</em>=10, GA 38±1 week), and group 4 (<em>n</em>=10, age 50±4 years). Respiratory pattern and ventilation were measured using a flow-through system. The breathing morphologies were defined according to the respiratory flow. We found (1) a predominant crescendo–decrescendo pattern in preterm infants (groups 1 and 2, &gt;50%) and this changed to a predominant decrescendo breathing in adults (group 4, 50%); (2) total breathing cycle and its phases did not change significantly among the neonatal groups, but they almost doubled in adult subjects; however, the number of breaths per breathing interval remained the same (crescendo–decrescendo) or less (flat and decrescendo) in adults as compared to preterm infants; (3) the duty cycle (breathing interval/cycle duration) remained consistent with age; and (4) at the beginning of each breathing interval, alveolar P<sub><span>co</span><sub><span>2</span></sub></sub> was highest and alveolar P<sub><span>o</span><sub>2</sub></sub> and O<sub>2</sub> saturation lowest. The findings suggest a change in the strategy of the respiratory control system during periodic breathing between the infant and the adult, perhaps dictated by mechanical and chemoreceptor limitations early in age, with a switch from a crescendo–decrescendo to a predominantly decrescendo pattern.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20976,"journal":{"name":"Respiration physiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2001-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00249-3","citationCount":"23","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The morphology of periodic breathing in infants and adults\",\"authors\":\"Zalman Weintraub ,&nbsp;Don Cates ,&nbsp;Kim Kwiatkowski ,&nbsp;Khalid Al-Hathlol ,&nbsp;Aamir Hussain ,&nbsp;Henrique Rigatto\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00249-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>To test the hypothesis that the crescendo–decrescendo type of pattern of periodic breathing is more common in infants than in adulthood, we examined the morphologies of periodic breathing in four groups of subjects: group 1 (<em>n</em>=10, gestational age 30±1 week), group 2 (<em>n</em>=10, GA 31±1 week), group 3 (<em>n</em>=10, GA 38±1 week), and group 4 (<em>n</em>=10, age 50±4 years). Respiratory pattern and ventilation were measured using a flow-through system. The breathing morphologies were defined according to the respiratory flow. We found (1) a predominant crescendo–decrescendo pattern in preterm infants (groups 1 and 2, &gt;50%) and this changed to a predominant decrescendo breathing in adults (group 4, 50%); (2) total breathing cycle and its phases did not change significantly among the neonatal groups, but they almost doubled in adult subjects; however, the number of breaths per breathing interval remained the same (crescendo–decrescendo) or less (flat and decrescendo) in adults as compared to preterm infants; (3) the duty cycle (breathing interval/cycle duration) remained consistent with age; and (4) at the beginning of each breathing interval, alveolar P<sub><span>co</span><sub><span>2</span></sub></sub> was highest and alveolar P<sub><span>o</span><sub>2</sub></sub> and O<sub>2</sub> saturation lowest. The findings suggest a change in the strategy of the respiratory control system during periodic breathing between the infant and the adult, perhaps dictated by mechanical and chemoreceptor limitations early in age, with a switch from a crescendo–decrescendo to a predominantly decrescendo pattern.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20976,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiration physiology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2001-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0034-5687(01)00249-3\",\"citationCount\":\"23\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiration physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034568701002493\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiration physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0034568701002493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 23

摘要

为了验证渐强-渐弱型周期性呼吸模式在婴儿中比成人更常见的假设,我们检查了四组受试者的周期性呼吸形态:1组(n=10,胎龄30±1周)、2组(n=10,胎龄31±1周)、3组(n=10,胎龄38±1周)和4组(n=10,胎龄50±4岁)。呼吸模式和通气性采用气流系统测量。根据呼吸流量定义呼吸形态。我们发现(1)在早产儿(第1组和第2组,50%)中以渐升-渐降模式为主,而在成人(第4组,50%)中则以渐降模式为主;(2)新生儿组总呼吸周期及其阶段变化不显著,但成人组呼吸周期变化几乎翻倍;然而,与早产儿相比,成人每次呼吸间隔的呼吸次数保持不变(渐增-渐减)或更少(平缓和渐减);(3)占空比(呼吸间隔/周期持续时间)与年龄保持一致;(4)各呼吸间隔开始时肺泡Pco2最高,肺泡Po2和O2饱和度最低。研究结果表明,在婴儿和成人的周期性呼吸过程中,呼吸控制系统的策略发生了变化,这可能是由早期的机械和化学感受器限制所决定的,从渐强-渐弱模式转变为主要的渐弱模式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The morphology of periodic breathing in infants and adults

To test the hypothesis that the crescendo–decrescendo type of pattern of periodic breathing is more common in infants than in adulthood, we examined the morphologies of periodic breathing in four groups of subjects: group 1 (n=10, gestational age 30±1 week), group 2 (n=10, GA 31±1 week), group 3 (n=10, GA 38±1 week), and group 4 (n=10, age 50±4 years). Respiratory pattern and ventilation were measured using a flow-through system. The breathing morphologies were defined according to the respiratory flow. We found (1) a predominant crescendo–decrescendo pattern in preterm infants (groups 1 and 2, >50%) and this changed to a predominant decrescendo breathing in adults (group 4, 50%); (2) total breathing cycle and its phases did not change significantly among the neonatal groups, but they almost doubled in adult subjects; however, the number of breaths per breathing interval remained the same (crescendo–decrescendo) or less (flat and decrescendo) in adults as compared to preterm infants; (3) the duty cycle (breathing interval/cycle duration) remained consistent with age; and (4) at the beginning of each breathing interval, alveolar Pco2 was highest and alveolar Po2 and O2 saturation lowest. The findings suggest a change in the strategy of the respiratory control system during periodic breathing between the infant and the adult, perhaps dictated by mechanical and chemoreceptor limitations early in age, with a switch from a crescendo–decrescendo to a predominantly decrescendo pattern.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effect of regional changes to shell conductance on oxygen consumption and growth of chicken embryos Metabolic and ventilatory responses to CO hypoxia at different levels of oxygenation in the rat Brain electrical activity during combined hypoxemia and hypoperfusion in anesthetized rats Comparison between anatomy and resistance of upper airway in normal subjects, snorers and OSAS patients Eicosanoids modulate hyperpnea-induced late phase airway obstruction and hyperreactivity in dogs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1