捉迷藏:IMF干预与影子经济:一项实证调查

M. Chletsos, Andreas Sintos
{"title":"捉迷藏:IMF干预与影子经济:一项实证调查","authors":"M. Chletsos, Andreas Sintos","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3567411","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the effect of IMF intervention on the size of the shadow economy. Using a panel of 141 countries from 1991 to 2014 we examine the impact of both IMF participation and conditionality on the informal economy. Following a recent methodological approach our analyses address sources of endogeneity related to, first the IMF participation decision and, second, the conditions included within the program. The empirical findings suggest that both IMF program participation and conditionality increase the size of the shadow economy. When we differentiate IMF conditions into structural and quantitative, we show that only structural conditions are significantly related to a larger shadow economy. Financial development can reduce the size of the shadow economy; however, it cannot reverse the detrimental effect from IMF intervention. Our initial results are found to be robust across alternative empirical specifications","PeriodicalId":18085,"journal":{"name":"Macroeconomics: Employment","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hide and Seek: IMF Intervention and the Shadow Economy: An Empirical Investigation\",\"authors\":\"M. Chletsos, Andreas Sintos\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3567411\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the effect of IMF intervention on the size of the shadow economy. Using a panel of 141 countries from 1991 to 2014 we examine the impact of both IMF participation and conditionality on the informal economy. Following a recent methodological approach our analyses address sources of endogeneity related to, first the IMF participation decision and, second, the conditions included within the program. The empirical findings suggest that both IMF program participation and conditionality increase the size of the shadow economy. When we differentiate IMF conditions into structural and quantitative, we show that only structural conditions are significantly related to a larger shadow economy. Financial development can reduce the size of the shadow economy; however, it cannot reverse the detrimental effect from IMF intervention. Our initial results are found to be robust across alternative empirical specifications\",\"PeriodicalId\":18085,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Macroeconomics: Employment\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Macroeconomics: Employment\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3567411\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Macroeconomics: Employment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3567411","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

本研究探讨国际货币基金组织干预对影子经济规模的影响。我们利用1991年至2014年141个国家的小组研究了IMF参与和条件对非正规经济的影响。根据最近的一种方法,我们的分析首先涉及与国际货币基金组织参与决定相关的内生性来源,其次是该计划所包含的条件。实证结果表明,参与国际货币基金组织计划和附加条件都增加了影子经济的规模。当我们将IMF条件区分为结构性和定量条件时,我们发现只有结构性条件与更大的影子经济显著相关。金融发展可以缩小影子经济的规模;然而,它无法扭转IMF干预的不利影响。我们的初步结果被发现在不同的经验规范中是稳健的
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hide and Seek: IMF Intervention and the Shadow Economy: An Empirical Investigation
This study investigates the effect of IMF intervention on the size of the shadow economy. Using a panel of 141 countries from 1991 to 2014 we examine the impact of both IMF participation and conditionality on the informal economy. Following a recent methodological approach our analyses address sources of endogeneity related to, first the IMF participation decision and, second, the conditions included within the program. The empirical findings suggest that both IMF program participation and conditionality increase the size of the shadow economy. When we differentiate IMF conditions into structural and quantitative, we show that only structural conditions are significantly related to a larger shadow economy. Financial development can reduce the size of the shadow economy; however, it cannot reverse the detrimental effect from IMF intervention. Our initial results are found to be robust across alternative empirical specifications
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Deregulating Teacher Labor Markets Trends in Commuting Time of European Workers: A Cross-Country Analysis Labor Market Networks and Asset Returns Intergenerational Income Mobility and Economic Freedom as Positive Liberty Gender Identity, Co-Working Spouses and Relative Income within Households
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1