Budi Setiawan, Ulfah Restu Nugraheni, Muji Rahayu
{"title":"Vacutainer serum separator sebagai alternatif tabung penampung darah pada pemeriksaan kadar ureum","authors":"Budi Setiawan, Ulfah Restu Nugraheni, Muji Rahayu","doi":"10.30651/jmlt.v4i1.7447","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Serum using is preferred for urea level because it does not use anticoagulants which can interfere with activity and  reaction to the results. The tubes that are widely used to collect blood into serum are  vacutainer serum separator and  vacutainer plain.This researche aims to determine the degree of agreement s between vacutainer serum separator and vacutainer plain usage on serum urea level result.This research was cross sectional design and hold on October 2020 with subject were taken from  thirty blood samples of health analyst students which taken randomly and had no history of disease or kidney function disorder. Each student was taken 6 ml of blood drawn using a venoject with each vacutainer containing 3 ml, so we had 60 data. The data were analyzed by descriptively and inferentially using the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) statistical test. From the descriptive analysis, the difference in mean levels was 0.35 mg/dL and the ICC statistical test resulted in a degree of agreement 0.745. The data were analyzed by descriptively and inferentially using the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) statistical test. From the descriptive analysis, the difference in mean levels was 0.35 mg/dL and the ICC statistical test resulted in a degree of agreement was 0.745. The calculation of the average working time between the vacutainer serum separator and the vacutainer plain was 4 minutes 38 seconds and 35 minutes 58 seconds. The analysis concluded that the vacutainer serum separator and the vacutainer plain could be used as an alternative of blood collecting tubes for urea level testing which proved to be no significant difference in the results from this research. Keywords : Urea level,  Vacutainer Serum Separator,  Vacutainer Plain","PeriodicalId":22695,"journal":{"name":"THE JOURNAL OF MUHAMMADIYAH MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGIST","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"THE JOURNAL OF MUHAMMADIYAH MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGIST","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30651/jmlt.v4i1.7447","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

血清是尿素水平的首选,因为它不使用抗凝剂,可以干扰活性和对结果的反应。目前广泛用于采集血清中的血液的管道有:真空容器、血清分离器和真空容器。本研究旨在确定真空瓶血清分离器与真空瓶普通使用对血清尿素水平结果的一致程度。本研究采用横断面设计,于2020年10月进行,受试者取自30份随机抽取的健康分析专业学生的血液样本,这些样本均无疾病史或肾功能障碍。每个学生取6毫升的血液,每个抽血器含有3毫升,所以我们有60个数据。采用类间相关系数(Interclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC)统计检验对数据进行描述性和推理性分析。从描述性分析中,平均水平的差异为0.35 mg/dL, ICC统计检验结果一致度为0.745。采用类间相关系数(Interclass Correlation Coefficient, ICC)统计检验对数据进行描述性和推理性分析。从描述性分析中,平均水平的差异为0.35 mg/dL, ICC统计检验的一致程度为0.745。计算出抽真空血清分离器与抽真空平原的平均工作时间分别为4分38秒和35分58秒。分析结果表明,真空抽血器血清分离器和真空抽血器平片可替代采血管进行尿素水平检测,两者结果无显著性差异。关键词:尿素水平,抽真空血清分离器,抽真空平原
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Vacutainer serum separator sebagai alternatif tabung penampung darah pada pemeriksaan kadar ureum
ABSTRACT Serum using is preferred for urea level because it does not use anticoagulants which can interfere with activity and  reaction to the results. The tubes that are widely used to collect blood into serum are  vacutainer serum separator and  vacutainer plain.This researche aims to determine the degree of agreement s between vacutainer serum separator and vacutainer plain usage on serum urea level result.This research was cross sectional design and hold on October 2020 with subject were taken from  thirty blood samples of health analyst students which taken randomly and had no history of disease or kidney function disorder. Each student was taken 6 ml of blood drawn using a venoject with each vacutainer containing 3 ml, so we had 60 data. The data were analyzed by descriptively and inferentially using the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) statistical test. From the descriptive analysis, the difference in mean levels was 0.35 mg/dL and the ICC statistical test resulted in a degree of agreement 0.745. The data were analyzed by descriptively and inferentially using the Interclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) statistical test. From the descriptive analysis, the difference in mean levels was 0.35 mg/dL and the ICC statistical test resulted in a degree of agreement was 0.745. The calculation of the average working time between the vacutainer serum separator and the vacutainer plain was 4 minutes 38 seconds and 35 minutes 58 seconds. The analysis concluded that the vacutainer serum separator and the vacutainer plain could be used as an alternative of blood collecting tubes for urea level testing which proved to be no significant difference in the results from this research. Keywords : Urea level,  Vacutainer Serum Separator,  Vacutainer Plain
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Penilaian Hasil Dipstik Urine (Nitrit Dan Leukosit Esterase) Sebagai Prediktor Bakteriuria Pemanfaatan Teri Jengki (Stolephorus indicus) Dan Layang Deles (Decapterus macrosoma) Sebagai Media Alternatif Pertumbuhan Escherichia coli Perbedaan Kadar Glukosa, Kadar Insulin, Homa IR Dan Protein Scube2 Pada Penderita DM Tipe 2 Terkontrol Dan Tidak Terkontrol Pengaruh Waktu Fermentasi Pada Produksi Bioethanol Dari Molase Korelasi Kadar High Sensitivity C-Reactive Protein (hs-CRP) Dan Kolesterol Low Density Lipoprotein (LDL) Pada Perokok Aktif Dengan Aktivitas Fisik
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1