Genevieve Grant
{"title":"Claiming justice in injury law","authors":"Genevieve Grant","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.2635258","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Contemporary personal injury law lives and breathes in the bureaucratic processing of compensation claims. Little empirical legal scholarship has explored claimant experiences in Australian compensation systems, despite their central role in access to justice for the injured. This article explores claimant experiences in compensation processes using data from a large longitudinal cohort study of patients admitted to hospital with injuries in three states (Victoria, New South Wales and South Australia). At 6 years after injury, participants (n=332) who had pursued claims in transport accident or workers’ compensation claims were interviewed about their experiences. The study highlights the diversity of claimant experiences and key themes in claimant encounters with compensation systems, including the relationship between rights information, advocacy and representation, and the inherent justice-based tensions in claims processing. The findings demonstrate that analysis of claimant experiences of injury law in its primary, bureaucratic form can provide important evidence for the evaluation and development of compensation systems.","PeriodicalId":44672,"journal":{"name":"Monash University Law Review","volume":"60 1","pages":"618-654"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2015-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Monash University Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.2635258","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

当代人身伤害法的生存和呼吸是在官僚化的赔偿索赔过程中。尽管澳大利亚赔偿制度在为受伤者伸张正义方面发挥着核心作用,但很少有实证法律学术研究探索了澳大利亚赔偿制度中的索赔人经验。本文利用来自三个州(维多利亚州、新南威尔士州和南澳大利亚州)住院的受伤患者的大型纵向队列研究数据,探讨了索赔人在赔偿过程中的经验。在受伤6年后,332名在交通事故或工人赔偿索赔中寻求索赔的参与者接受了关于他们经历的采访。该研究强调了索赔人经历的多样性和索赔人遇到赔偿制度时的关键主题,包括权利信息、倡导和代表之间的关系,以及索赔处理中固有的基于正义的紧张关系。研究结果表明,对初级官僚形式的伤害法索赔人经验的分析可以为赔偿制度的评估和发展提供重要证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Claiming justice in injury law
Contemporary personal injury law lives and breathes in the bureaucratic processing of compensation claims. Little empirical legal scholarship has explored claimant experiences in Australian compensation systems, despite their central role in access to justice for the injured. This article explores claimant experiences in compensation processes using data from a large longitudinal cohort study of patients admitted to hospital with injuries in three states (Victoria, New South Wales and South Australia). At 6 years after injury, participants (n=332) who had pursued claims in transport accident or workers’ compensation claims were interviewed about their experiences. The study highlights the diversity of claimant experiences and key themes in claimant encounters with compensation systems, including the relationship between rights information, advocacy and representation, and the inherent justice-based tensions in claims processing. The findings demonstrate that analysis of claimant experiences of injury law in its primary, bureaucratic form can provide important evidence for the evaluation and development of compensation systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Revisiting Section 32(1) of the Victorian Charter: strained constructions and legislative intention Peoplehood Obscured? The Normative Status of Self-Determination after the Chagos Advisory Opinion (Advance) Is the Wisdom of a Person's Decision Relevant to Their Capacity to Make That Decision? Not Black and White?: Disciplinary Regulation of Doctors Convicted of Child Pornography Offences in Australia Reconceptualising the Law of the Dead by Expanding the Interests of the Living
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1