寻找一种民族语言学范式:一个关键术语和概念的词汇表

M Jerzy Bartmiński
{"title":"寻找一种民族语言学范式:一个关键术语和概念的词汇表","authors":"M Jerzy Bartmiński","doi":"10.2298/JFI2002079B","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper?s author examines to what extent ethnolingustics meets the paradigmatic criteria according to Thomas Kuhn (?A paradigm is the thing that divides the members of the scientific community and vice versa, the scientific community connects people sharing a certain paradigm?) and compares the key terms which constitute this discipline?s instrumentarium. The author focuses on the researchers gathered around the international annual titled Etnolingwistyka, the representatives of the approach known as the Lublin School of Cognitive Ethnolinguistics. Two dictionaries are representative of the School: S?ownik stereotyp?w i symboli ludowych (Vol. 1-2, 1996-2020) and the five-volume lexicon titled Leksykon aksjologiczny S?owian i ich s?siad?w (2015-2019). According to the author, based on these two dictionaries and the accompanying publications, it is already possible to compile a glossary of key terms of ethnolinguistics. Such glossary would consist of several key concepts: the linguistic worldview, concept (synonymous with ?stereotype?), viewpoint and perspective, cognitive definition, profiling and profile, subject, values, etc. This terminological apparatus was particularly used in the creation of the said axiological lexicon and has now become the common good of the whole team of authors. This corresponds to Kuhn?s second postulate.","PeriodicalId":30153,"journal":{"name":"Juznoslovenski Filolog","volume":"7 1","pages":"79-103"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"In search of an ethnolinguistic paradigm: A glossary of key terms and concepts\",\"authors\":\"M Jerzy Bartmiński\",\"doi\":\"10.2298/JFI2002079B\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper?s author examines to what extent ethnolingustics meets the paradigmatic criteria according to Thomas Kuhn (?A paradigm is the thing that divides the members of the scientific community and vice versa, the scientific community connects people sharing a certain paradigm?) and compares the key terms which constitute this discipline?s instrumentarium. The author focuses on the researchers gathered around the international annual titled Etnolingwistyka, the representatives of the approach known as the Lublin School of Cognitive Ethnolinguistics. Two dictionaries are representative of the School: S?ownik stereotyp?w i symboli ludowych (Vol. 1-2, 1996-2020) and the five-volume lexicon titled Leksykon aksjologiczny S?owian i ich s?siad?w (2015-2019). According to the author, based on these two dictionaries and the accompanying publications, it is already possible to compile a glossary of key terms of ethnolinguistics. Such glossary would consist of several key concepts: the linguistic worldview, concept (synonymous with ?stereotype?), viewpoint and perspective, cognitive definition, profiling and profile, subject, values, etc. This terminological apparatus was particularly used in the creation of the said axiological lexicon and has now become the common good of the whole team of authors. This corresponds to Kuhn?s second postulate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30153,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Juznoslovenski Filolog\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"79-103\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Juznoslovenski Filolog\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2298/JFI2002079B\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Juznoslovenski Filolog","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2298/JFI2002079B","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

纸吗?作者考察了民族语言学在多大程度上符合托马斯·库恩(Thomas Kuhn)的范式标准。范式是区分科学共同体成员的东西反之亦然,科学共同体将共享某种范式的人们联系起来?)并比较构成这一学科的关键术语?instrumentarium。作者关注的是聚集在名为Etnolingwistyka的国际年度会议上的研究人员,他们是卢布林认知民族语言学学派的代表。两本词典是学院的代表:S?ownik stereotyp吗?《符号学》(第1-2卷,1996-2020年)和五卷词典《Leksykon aksjologiczny S?》这是什么意思?w(2015 - 2019)。作者认为,根据这两本词典和随附的出版物,已经有可能编制一个民族语言学关键术语的词汇表。这种词汇表将包括几个关键概念:语言世界观、概念(与刻板印象同义)、观点和观点、认知定义、概况和概况、主题、价值观等。这个术语工具在创建上述价值论词典时特别使用,现在已成为整个作者团队的共同利益。这对应于库恩?第二个假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
In search of an ethnolinguistic paradigm: A glossary of key terms and concepts
The paper?s author examines to what extent ethnolingustics meets the paradigmatic criteria according to Thomas Kuhn (?A paradigm is the thing that divides the members of the scientific community and vice versa, the scientific community connects people sharing a certain paradigm?) and compares the key terms which constitute this discipline?s instrumentarium. The author focuses on the researchers gathered around the international annual titled Etnolingwistyka, the representatives of the approach known as the Lublin School of Cognitive Ethnolinguistics. Two dictionaries are representative of the School: S?ownik stereotyp?w i symboli ludowych (Vol. 1-2, 1996-2020) and the five-volume lexicon titled Leksykon aksjologiczny S?owian i ich s?siad?w (2015-2019). According to the author, based on these two dictionaries and the accompanying publications, it is already possible to compile a glossary of key terms of ethnolinguistics. Such glossary would consist of several key concepts: the linguistic worldview, concept (synonymous with ?stereotype?), viewpoint and perspective, cognitive definition, profiling and profile, subject, values, etc. This terminological apparatus was particularly used in the creation of the said axiological lexicon and has now become the common good of the whole team of authors. This corresponds to Kuhn?s second postulate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Linguoculturological aspects of the lexeme cat in the Serbian language Destructive verbs with defective paradigms in the Russian language The specificity of dialectal word formation - some methodological and other remarks An example of the variant suffixes -ica and -ka in feminatives derived from masculine words ending in -or and -ator Lexical factors in the allocation of unique morphemes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1