事先授权对临床决策的影响

Stephen Salzbrenner
{"title":"事先授权对临床决策的影响","authors":"Stephen Salzbrenner","doi":"10.26502/aimr.0093","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It may seem intuitive to clinicians like myself, but prior authorization (PA), in its current state, significantly affects clinical decision making. If used as originally intended, PA can have a positive effect, including maximizing therapeutic value, ensuring safe prescribing, and containing costs [1]. PA can, for instance, steer a provider to a less expensive but equally effective medication or alert them to a significant contraindication. Both scenarios benefit the patient by improving their likelihood of treatment adherence and improved health. However, prior authorization requirements can also have a detrimental effect on clinical decisions and patient health [2].","PeriodicalId":8282,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Internal Medicine Research","volume":"7 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Effect of Prior Authorization on Clinical Decisions\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Salzbrenner\",\"doi\":\"10.26502/aimr.0093\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It may seem intuitive to clinicians like myself, but prior authorization (PA), in its current state, significantly affects clinical decision making. If used as originally intended, PA can have a positive effect, including maximizing therapeutic value, ensuring safe prescribing, and containing costs [1]. PA can, for instance, steer a provider to a less expensive but equally effective medication or alert them to a significant contraindication. Both scenarios benefit the patient by improving their likelihood of treatment adherence and improved health. However, prior authorization requirements can also have a detrimental effect on clinical decisions and patient health [2].\",\"PeriodicalId\":8282,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Internal Medicine Research\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Internal Medicine Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26502/aimr.0093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Internal Medicine Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26502/aimr.0093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于像我这样的临床医生来说,这似乎是很直观的,但在目前的状态下,事先授权(PA)对临床决策有很大的影响。如果按原计划使用,PA可以产生积极作用,包括最大化治疗价值、确保处方安全、控制成本[1]。例如,私人助理可以引导医生使用一种更便宜但同样有效的药物,或者提醒他们注意一种重要的禁忌症。这两种情况都有利于患者,因为他们更有可能坚持治疗并改善健康状况。然而,事先授权要求也可能对临床决策和患者健康产生不利影响[2]。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Effect of Prior Authorization on Clinical Decisions
It may seem intuitive to clinicians like myself, but prior authorization (PA), in its current state, significantly affects clinical decision making. If used as originally intended, PA can have a positive effect, including maximizing therapeutic value, ensuring safe prescribing, and containing costs [1]. PA can, for instance, steer a provider to a less expensive but equally effective medication or alert them to a significant contraindication. Both scenarios benefit the patient by improving their likelihood of treatment adherence and improved health. However, prior authorization requirements can also have a detrimental effect on clinical decisions and patient health [2].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Early vs Delayed Feeding after Endoscopic Esophageal Variceal Ligation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Effect of Andrographis paniculata Treatment for Nonimmune Patients with Early-Stage COVID-19 on the Prevention of Pneumonia: A Retrospective Cohort Study A New Anthropometric Model for Body Composition Estimation in the Assessment of Metabolic Risk Factors of Obese Women Demographic and Clinical Profile Analysis of Covid-19 Suspected Patients: A Tertiary Care Hospital Study in Bangladesh Cellular Uptake and Localization of Hematoporphyrin Derivatives in Lung Adenocarcinoma A549, Squamous Carcinoma H520 and Small Cell Carcinoma H446 Cell Lines
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1