秘密胜过监督?获取信息和泄密如何影响欧洲议会对外交政策的监督

IF 0.3 Q3 LAW China-EU Law Journal Pub Date : 2018-07-27 DOI:10.4324/9781315178721-9
V. Abazi
{"title":"秘密胜过监督?获取信息和泄密如何影响欧洲议会对外交政策的监督","authors":"V. Abazi","doi":"10.4324/9781315178721-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter aims to contribute to the debate on European parliamentary (EP) oversight by examining how institutional access to official secrets as well as leaks unauthorised disclosure of official secrets affect the oversight role of the EP in foreign policy. It provides an analysis of how through leaks and informal channels of communication, the EP is able to conduct oversight in foreign policy. The reliance of parliaments on executive actors to access information is inherent in the structure of their relation since it is the executive that has the main prerogatives in foreign policy and hence holds the information. The chapter focuses on how access to classified information and leaks affect parliamentary oversight. It shows that leaks can play a significant role for a more informed EP and facilitate oversight, future research should further enquire to what extent leaks politicise parliamentary oversight in foreign policy and possibly undermine trust between parliaments and executive actors in the matters of international relations.","PeriodicalId":29853,"journal":{"name":"China-EU Law Journal","volume":"89 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Oversight trumped by secrets? How access to information and leaks affect European parliamentary oversight in foreign policy\",\"authors\":\"V. Abazi\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781315178721-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter aims to contribute to the debate on European parliamentary (EP) oversight by examining how institutional access to official secrets as well as leaks unauthorised disclosure of official secrets affect the oversight role of the EP in foreign policy. It provides an analysis of how through leaks and informal channels of communication, the EP is able to conduct oversight in foreign policy. The reliance of parliaments on executive actors to access information is inherent in the structure of their relation since it is the executive that has the main prerogatives in foreign policy and hence holds the information. The chapter focuses on how access to classified information and leaks affect parliamentary oversight. It shows that leaks can play a significant role for a more informed EP and facilitate oversight, future research should further enquire to what extent leaks politicise parliamentary oversight in foreign policy and possibly undermine trust between parliaments and executive actors in the matters of international relations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29853,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China-EU Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"89 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China-EU Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178721-9\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China-EU Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315178721-9","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章旨在通过研究机构获取官方机密以及未经授权披露官方机密如何影响欧洲议会在外交政策中的监督作用,为欧洲议会监督的辩论做出贡献。报告分析了欧洲议会是如何通过泄密和非正式沟通渠道对外交政策进行监督的。议会依赖行政行为体获取信息是其关系结构所固有的,因为行政部门在外交政策方面拥有主要特权,因此掌握信息。这一章的重点是获取机密信息和泄密如何影响议会的监督。它表明,泄密可以为更知情的欧洲议会发挥重要作用,并促进监督,未来的研究应进一步探究泄密在多大程度上使议会对外交政策的监督政治化,并可能破坏议会与执行机构在国际关系事务上的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Oversight trumped by secrets? How access to information and leaks affect European parliamentary oversight in foreign policy
This chapter aims to contribute to the debate on European parliamentary (EP) oversight by examining how institutional access to official secrets as well as leaks unauthorised disclosure of official secrets affect the oversight role of the EP in foreign policy. It provides an analysis of how through leaks and informal channels of communication, the EP is able to conduct oversight in foreign policy. The reliance of parliaments on executive actors to access information is inherent in the structure of their relation since it is the executive that has the main prerogatives in foreign policy and hence holds the information. The chapter focuses on how access to classified information and leaks affect parliamentary oversight. It shows that leaks can play a significant role for a more informed EP and facilitate oversight, future research should further enquire to what extent leaks politicise parliamentary oversight in foreign policy and possibly undermine trust between parliaments and executive actors in the matters of international relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Principles of EU law in climate litigation Climate adaptation law: a European perspective Correction: The evaluation of innovation in merger control: a comparison between China and other jurisdictions Special issue on competition law The evaluation of innovation in merger control: a comparison between china and other jurisdictions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1