看空Vs看多风险网络:欧元区金融体系分析

IF 5.4 2区 经济学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money Pub Date : 2022-03-01 DOI:10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101522
Matteo Foglia , Abdelhamid Addi , Gang-Jin Wang , Eliana Angelini
{"title":"看空Vs看多风险网络:欧元区金融体系分析","authors":"Matteo Foglia ,&nbsp;Abdelhamid Addi ,&nbsp;Gang-Jin Wang ,&nbsp;Eliana Angelini","doi":"10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101522","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span>This paper studies the extreme risk spillover between 183 Eurozone </span>financial institutions<span> (such as banks, insurances, diversified financial, real estate firms) over the period 2005–2020. Employing the Granger causality test<span> across quantiles, we are able to investigate the tail risk interdependence between financial firms under extreme (downside and upside) conditions. Thanks to this framework, we can understand and estimate the risk spillover effect, in different propagation mechanisms, during bad and good conditions. Our findings show a heterogeneous effect between risk spillovers depending on the level of risk considered, highlighting how bearish conditions play an important role in the sectoral propagation of risk spillover. We document the presence of the “shift-contagion” effect. Finally, we investigate the risk-monetary policy nexus. Our findings provide new insights into the impact of the monetary stance on financial stability, documenting the double strategy played by the European Central Bank, namely the “leaning against the wind” and the “modified Jackson Hole consensus” approach.</span></span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":48119,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bearish Vs Bullish risk network: A Eurozone financial system analysis\",\"authors\":\"Matteo Foglia ,&nbsp;Abdelhamid Addi ,&nbsp;Gang-Jin Wang ,&nbsp;Eliana Angelini\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.intfin.2022.101522\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><span>This paper studies the extreme risk spillover between 183 Eurozone </span>financial institutions<span> (such as banks, insurances, diversified financial, real estate firms) over the period 2005–2020. Employing the Granger causality test<span> across quantiles, we are able to investigate the tail risk interdependence between financial firms under extreme (downside and upside) conditions. Thanks to this framework, we can understand and estimate the risk spillover effect, in different propagation mechanisms, during bad and good conditions. Our findings show a heterogeneous effect between risk spillovers depending on the level of risk considered, highlighting how bearish conditions play an important role in the sectoral propagation of risk spillover. We document the presence of the “shift-contagion” effect. Finally, we investigate the risk-monetary policy nexus. Our findings provide new insights into the impact of the monetary stance on financial stability, documenting the double strategy played by the European Central Bank, namely the “leaning against the wind” and the “modified Jackson Hole consensus” approach.</span></span></p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443122000142\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS, FINANCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Financial Markets Institutions & Money","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1042443122000142","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

本文研究了2005-2020年期间183家欧元区金融机构(如银行、保险、多元化金融、房地产公司)之间的极端风险溢出。采用跨分位数的格兰杰因果检验,我们能够调查极端(下行和上行)条件下金融公司之间的尾部风险相互依赖关系。借助这一框架,我们可以了解和估计在不同的传播机制下,在恶劣和良好条件下的风险溢出效应。我们的研究结果显示,风险溢出之间存在异质性效应,这取决于所考虑的风险水平,突出了看跌条件在风险溢出的部门传播中发挥的重要作用。我们记录了“转移传染”效应的存在。最后,我们研究了风险与货币政策的关系。我们的研究结果为货币立场对金融稳定的影响提供了新的见解,记录了欧洲央行所采取的双重策略,即“逆风”和“修正的杰克逊霍尔共识”方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bearish Vs Bullish risk network: A Eurozone financial system analysis

This paper studies the extreme risk spillover between 183 Eurozone financial institutions (such as banks, insurances, diversified financial, real estate firms) over the period 2005–2020. Employing the Granger causality test across quantiles, we are able to investigate the tail risk interdependence between financial firms under extreme (downside and upside) conditions. Thanks to this framework, we can understand and estimate the risk spillover effect, in different propagation mechanisms, during bad and good conditions. Our findings show a heterogeneous effect between risk spillovers depending on the level of risk considered, highlighting how bearish conditions play an important role in the sectoral propagation of risk spillover. We document the presence of the “shift-contagion” effect. Finally, we investigate the risk-monetary policy nexus. Our findings provide new insights into the impact of the monetary stance on financial stability, documenting the double strategy played by the European Central Bank, namely the “leaning against the wind” and the “modified Jackson Hole consensus” approach.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
142
期刊介绍: International trade, financing and investments, and the related cash and credit transactions, have grown at an extremely rapid pace in recent years. The international monetary system has continued to evolve to accommodate the need for foreign-currency denominated transactions and in the process has provided opportunities for its ongoing observation and study. The purpose of the Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions & Money is to publish rigorous, original articles dealing with the international aspects of financial markets, institutions and money. Theoretical/conceptual and empirical papers providing meaningful insights into the subject areas will be considered. The following topic areas, although not exhaustive, are representative of the coverage in this Journal. • International financial markets • International securities markets • Foreign exchange markets • Eurocurrency markets • International syndications • Term structures of Eurocurrency rates • Determination of exchange rates • Information, speculation and parity • Forward rates and swaps • International payment mechanisms • International commercial banking; • International investment banking • Central bank intervention • International monetary systems • Balance of payments.
期刊最新文献
The Shock of US-China trade war and the job Market: Downstream shrinkage and upstream employment Beyond the target: The spillover effect of shareholder activism on corporate tax avoidance The bind and the slack of Basel III liquidity regulations: Evidence from Indonesia A more sustainable future: Can politically connected CEOs spur the nexus between ESG performance and firm financial performance? Are state-owned enterprises more responsible for carbon neutrality? Evidence from stock market reactions to China’s commitment to carbon neutrality
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1