用细菌学参数和其他技术评价埃塞俄比亚西南部Jimma镇不同采样点生牛奶的质量

Asmarech Dolango, Konta
{"title":"用细菌学参数和其他技术评价埃塞俄比亚西南部Jimma镇不同采样点生牛奶的质量","authors":"Asmarech Dolango, Konta","doi":"10.7176/fsqm/104-04","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A cross-sectional study was carried out from May 2014 to February 2015 to identify potential sources of raw cows’ milk contamination and assess its bacteriological quality, and investigate the bacteriological quality of fresh cows’ milk at different sampling points, in Jimma town. A total of 348 milk samples from udder, milking bucket, storage containers and vendors were randomly collected. To determine the bacterial load in raw milk samples, standard plate count test (SPC), coliform counts (CC), somatic cell counts (SCC), and california mastitis test (CMT) were conducted. The overall mean value of total bacterial counts (TBC) and coliform counts (CC) were 6.76log10 CFU/ml and 4.57 log10 CFU/ml respectively. The mean TBC were 5.87 ± 0.09 log10 CFU/ml, 6.14 ± 0.07 log10 CFU/ml, 7.39 ± 0.13 log10 CFU/ml, and 7.63 ± 0.06 log10 CFU/ml at udder, milking bucket, storage container and milk vendor levels respectively. The mean CC from udder, milking bucket, storage container and vendor were 3.14 ±0.09 log10 CFU/ml, 4.08 ± 0.07 log10 CFU/ml, 5.07 ± 0.23 log10 CFU/ml and 6.00 ± 0.21 log10 CFU/ml respectively. The difference in the mean TBC and CC at each sampling points were statistically significant (P=0.001). Among the investigated sampling points, the highest level of contamination in terms of TBC and CC was at vendor level. Factors that contributed to poor quality of milk were unhygienic milking procedures, lack of potable water, dirty milking environment and use of unclean milking and storage containers. According to international standards, TBC, CC and SCC have values above the upper limits set. The results of the current study indicated that the cow milk produced and distributed in the study area can generally be considered as substandard in quality. Therefore, it is important to put in place an improved hygienic practice at all levels in the dairy to improve the quality of cows’ milk.","PeriodicalId":12384,"journal":{"name":"Food Science and Quality Management","volume":"96 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quality of Assessment Raw Cows’ Milk at Different Sampling Points Using Bacteriological Parameters and Other Techniques in Jimma Town, South Western Ethiopia\",\"authors\":\"Asmarech Dolango, Konta\",\"doi\":\"10.7176/fsqm/104-04\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A cross-sectional study was carried out from May 2014 to February 2015 to identify potential sources of raw cows’ milk contamination and assess its bacteriological quality, and investigate the bacteriological quality of fresh cows’ milk at different sampling points, in Jimma town. A total of 348 milk samples from udder, milking bucket, storage containers and vendors were randomly collected. To determine the bacterial load in raw milk samples, standard plate count test (SPC), coliform counts (CC), somatic cell counts (SCC), and california mastitis test (CMT) were conducted. The overall mean value of total bacterial counts (TBC) and coliform counts (CC) were 6.76log10 CFU/ml and 4.57 log10 CFU/ml respectively. The mean TBC were 5.87 ± 0.09 log10 CFU/ml, 6.14 ± 0.07 log10 CFU/ml, 7.39 ± 0.13 log10 CFU/ml, and 7.63 ± 0.06 log10 CFU/ml at udder, milking bucket, storage container and milk vendor levels respectively. The mean CC from udder, milking bucket, storage container and vendor were 3.14 ±0.09 log10 CFU/ml, 4.08 ± 0.07 log10 CFU/ml, 5.07 ± 0.23 log10 CFU/ml and 6.00 ± 0.21 log10 CFU/ml respectively. The difference in the mean TBC and CC at each sampling points were statistically significant (P=0.001). Among the investigated sampling points, the highest level of contamination in terms of TBC and CC was at vendor level. Factors that contributed to poor quality of milk were unhygienic milking procedures, lack of potable water, dirty milking environment and use of unclean milking and storage containers. According to international standards, TBC, CC and SCC have values above the upper limits set. The results of the current study indicated that the cow milk produced and distributed in the study area can generally be considered as substandard in quality. Therefore, it is important to put in place an improved hygienic practice at all levels in the dairy to improve the quality of cows’ milk.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Science and Quality Management\",\"volume\":\"96 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Science and Quality Management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7176/fsqm/104-04\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Science and Quality Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7176/fsqm/104-04","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2014年5月至2015年2月,在吉马镇开展了一项横断面研究,以确定原料奶的潜在污染源并评估其细菌学质量,并对不同采样点鲜奶的细菌学质量进行了调查。随机抽取奶头、奶桶、奶罐及奶店共348份奶类样本。为了确定原料乳样品中的细菌负荷,进行了标准平板计数(SPC)、大肠菌群计数(CC)、体细胞计数(SCC)和加州乳腺炎试验(CMT)。总细菌计数(TBC)和大肠菌群计数(CC)的总体平均值分别为6.76log10 CFU/ml和4.57 log10 CFU/ml。乳房、挤奶桶、储存容器和奶商水平的平均TBC分别为5.87±0.09 log10 CFU/ml、6.14±0.07 log10 CFU/ml、7.39±0.13 log10 CFU/ml和7.63±0.06 log10 CFU/ml。乳房、挤奶桶、储存容器和供应商的平均CC分别为3.14±0.09 log10 CFU/ml、4.08±0.07 log10 CFU/ml、5.07±0.23 log10 CFU/ml和6.00±0.21 log10 CFU/ml。各采样点TBC、CC均值差异均有统计学意义(P=0.001)。在调查的采样点中,就TBC和CC而言,污染水平最高的是供应商水平。导致牛奶质量差的因素是不卫生的挤奶程序、缺乏饮用水、肮脏的挤奶环境以及使用不干净的挤奶和储存容器。根据国际标准,TBC、CC和SCC的值高于设定的上限。本研究结果表明,研究区内生产和销售的牛奶质量一般为不合格。因此,重要的是在奶牛场的各个层面实施改进的卫生措施,以提高牛奶的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Quality of Assessment Raw Cows’ Milk at Different Sampling Points Using Bacteriological Parameters and Other Techniques in Jimma Town, South Western Ethiopia
A cross-sectional study was carried out from May 2014 to February 2015 to identify potential sources of raw cows’ milk contamination and assess its bacteriological quality, and investigate the bacteriological quality of fresh cows’ milk at different sampling points, in Jimma town. A total of 348 milk samples from udder, milking bucket, storage containers and vendors were randomly collected. To determine the bacterial load in raw milk samples, standard plate count test (SPC), coliform counts (CC), somatic cell counts (SCC), and california mastitis test (CMT) were conducted. The overall mean value of total bacterial counts (TBC) and coliform counts (CC) were 6.76log10 CFU/ml and 4.57 log10 CFU/ml respectively. The mean TBC were 5.87 ± 0.09 log10 CFU/ml, 6.14 ± 0.07 log10 CFU/ml, 7.39 ± 0.13 log10 CFU/ml, and 7.63 ± 0.06 log10 CFU/ml at udder, milking bucket, storage container and milk vendor levels respectively. The mean CC from udder, milking bucket, storage container and vendor were 3.14 ±0.09 log10 CFU/ml, 4.08 ± 0.07 log10 CFU/ml, 5.07 ± 0.23 log10 CFU/ml and 6.00 ± 0.21 log10 CFU/ml respectively. The difference in the mean TBC and CC at each sampling points were statistically significant (P=0.001). Among the investigated sampling points, the highest level of contamination in terms of TBC and CC was at vendor level. Factors that contributed to poor quality of milk were unhygienic milking procedures, lack of potable water, dirty milking environment and use of unclean milking and storage containers. According to international standards, TBC, CC and SCC have values above the upper limits set. The results of the current study indicated that the cow milk produced and distributed in the study area can generally be considered as substandard in quality. Therefore, it is important to put in place an improved hygienic practice at all levels in the dairy to improve the quality of cows’ milk.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Survey of Some Quality Characteristics of Frozen-Raw, Precooked, and Dried Manti Samples, A Traditional Food, Offered For Sale In Turkey Review on Effect of Edible Coatings on Quality and Shelf Life of Fruits and Vegetables Factors Affecting Adoption of Improved Maize Varieties in Babile and Fedis Districts of East Hararghe Zone, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia Taste Dysfunction of Chronic Kidney Disease Patients on Renal Diet and its Relationship with Patient Satisfaction in the Medical Ward at AL-Khor Hospital – State of Qatar Selection Progress on Growth and Milk Production Performance of Indigenous Abergelle Goat Breed under on Station Condition in Wag-Himra, Ethiopia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1