全球关系与欧洲一体化中的记忆复杂性:一个理论视角

A. Ludwig
{"title":"全球关系与欧洲一体化中的记忆复杂性:一个理论视角","authors":"A. Ludwig","doi":"10.5771/0947-9511-2023-1-19","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Learning from and coming to terms with Europe’s belligerent past have been important drivers of regional integration since the Second World War. Unlike other disciplines, International Relations (IR) has long ignored memory as a relevant factor in global relations, regional integration, or foreign policy. I argue that this is mainly due to the dominant science philosophical premises of positivism in IR theory (IRT) and has only slowly begun to change. This article shows how the constructivist, historical and relational turns in IRT have brought IR closer to memory studies. It aims to further promote this trend by proposing another meta-theoretical perspective for IR, European studies, and the concept of memory: complexity thinking. In its ‘general’ form, advocated by Edgar Morin, it provides a transdisciplinary background for the analysis of memory in our VUCA world. Consequently, complexity also changes our perspective on European integration, not least with regard to the processes of remembering in its context.","PeriodicalId":53497,"journal":{"name":"Journal of European Integration History","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Complexity of Memory in Global Relations and European Integration: A Theoretical Perspective\",\"authors\":\"A. Ludwig\",\"doi\":\"10.5771/0947-9511-2023-1-19\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Learning from and coming to terms with Europe’s belligerent past have been important drivers of regional integration since the Second World War. Unlike other disciplines, International Relations (IR) has long ignored memory as a relevant factor in global relations, regional integration, or foreign policy. I argue that this is mainly due to the dominant science philosophical premises of positivism in IR theory (IRT) and has only slowly begun to change. This article shows how the constructivist, historical and relational turns in IRT have brought IR closer to memory studies. It aims to further promote this trend by proposing another meta-theoretical perspective for IR, European studies, and the concept of memory: complexity thinking. In its ‘general’ form, advocated by Edgar Morin, it provides a transdisciplinary background for the analysis of memory in our VUCA world. Consequently, complexity also changes our perspective on European integration, not least with regard to the processes of remembering in its context.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53497,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of European Integration History\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of European Integration History\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5771/0947-9511-2023-1-19\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of European Integration History","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5771/0947-9511-2023-1-19","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

自第二次世界大战以来,从欧洲好战的过去中吸取教训并接受教训一直是区域一体化的重要推动力。与其他学科不同,国际关系(IR)长期以来忽视了记忆在全球关系、区域一体化或外交政策中的相关因素。我认为,这主要是由于实证主义在IR理论(IRT)中占主导地位的科学哲学前提,并且只是缓慢地开始改变。这篇文章展示了IRT的建构主义,历史和关系的转变如何使IR更接近记忆研究。本文旨在进一步推动这一趋势,为国际关系、欧洲研究和记忆概念提出另一个元理论视角:复杂性思维。在埃德加·莫林倡导的“一般”形式中,它为我们的VUCA世界中的记忆分析提供了一个跨学科的背景。因此,复杂性也改变了我们对欧洲一体化的看法,尤其是在其背景下的记忆过程方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Complexity of Memory in Global Relations and European Integration: A Theoretical Perspective
Learning from and coming to terms with Europe’s belligerent past have been important drivers of regional integration since the Second World War. Unlike other disciplines, International Relations (IR) has long ignored memory as a relevant factor in global relations, regional integration, or foreign policy. I argue that this is mainly due to the dominant science philosophical premises of positivism in IR theory (IRT) and has only slowly begun to change. This article shows how the constructivist, historical and relational turns in IRT have brought IR closer to memory studies. It aims to further promote this trend by proposing another meta-theoretical perspective for IR, European studies, and the concept of memory: complexity thinking. In its ‘general’ form, advocated by Edgar Morin, it provides a transdisciplinary background for the analysis of memory in our VUCA world. Consequently, complexity also changes our perspective on European integration, not least with regard to the processes of remembering in its context.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of European Integration History
Journal of European Integration History Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
期刊最新文献
Divided by Memory: Divergent Memory Cultures and the Debate about Democracy in the EU Colonial Memories and the French Partisan Right: Preserving National Identity Through or Against Diversity (2002-2022) Constructing a Collective Memory in the Franco-German-Swiss Upper Rhine Region: European, Trans(national) or Regional? The Complexity of Memory in Global Relations and European Integration: A Theoretical Perspective In memoriam Claudia Hiepel
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1