试验和检验方法验证的比较

Jong-Yeon Hwang, Sin-Woo Lee, Kum-hee Kim, Y. Huh, E. Yoo, Bokyoung Kim, Hee Jung Kim, Hyeri Lee, S. Ko, Jeehye Kim, Sooa Jeon, J. Lee, Kyung Ro Lee, Suk-Young Hong, Hyun Mi Chung, Jongwoo Choi
{"title":"试验和检验方法验证的比较","authors":"Jong-Yeon Hwang, Sin-Woo Lee, Kum-hee Kim, Y. Huh, E. Yoo, Bokyoung Kim, Hee Jung Kim, Hyeri Lee, S. Ko, Jeehye Kim, Sooa Jeon, J. Lee, Kyung Ro Lee, Suk-Young Hong, Hyun Mi Chung, Jongwoo Choi","doi":"10.36278/jeaht.22.3.104","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"One of the most important purposes of a validation method is to verify whether a test method is suitable for the purpose of the test. In this study, validation parameters that are used by national and international institutes for test and inspection bodies are classified. As a result of classifying these general factors, method validation parameters were performed, including the following cases: 1 the confirmation of a new test method, 2 comparison between a non-standardized test method and standardized method, 3confirmation of a test method needing such extensions as a test method verification, verification of the test method applied between other test institutes or analysts, 4 verification of the required similarity between test methods, and 5 revalidation of the previously verified test methods. The general parameters applied in the validation processes were classified as follows; specificity, selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, detection limit uncertainty, quantitative limit, and range. By a comparison of the validation guidelines or guideline parameters applied by the test and inspection bodies, the survey results were considered to be useful in preparing validation guidelines for environmental testing and inspection methods.","PeriodicalId":15758,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","volume":"277 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Method Validation for Test and Inspections\",\"authors\":\"Jong-Yeon Hwang, Sin-Woo Lee, Kum-hee Kim, Y. Huh, E. Yoo, Bokyoung Kim, Hee Jung Kim, Hyeri Lee, S. Ko, Jeehye Kim, Sooa Jeon, J. Lee, Kyung Ro Lee, Suk-Young Hong, Hyun Mi Chung, Jongwoo Choi\",\"doi\":\"10.36278/jeaht.22.3.104\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"One of the most important purposes of a validation method is to verify whether a test method is suitable for the purpose of the test. In this study, validation parameters that are used by national and international institutes for test and inspection bodies are classified. As a result of classifying these general factors, method validation parameters were performed, including the following cases: 1 the confirmation of a new test method, 2 comparison between a non-standardized test method and standardized method, 3confirmation of a test method needing such extensions as a test method verification, verification of the test method applied between other test institutes or analysts, 4 verification of the required similarity between test methods, and 5 revalidation of the previously verified test methods. The general parameters applied in the validation processes were classified as follows; specificity, selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, detection limit uncertainty, quantitative limit, and range. By a comparison of the validation guidelines or guideline parameters applied by the test and inspection bodies, the survey results were considered to be useful in preparing validation guidelines for environmental testing and inspection methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15758,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"277 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36278/jeaht.22.3.104\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Environmental Analysis, Health and Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36278/jeaht.22.3.104","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

验证方法最重要的目的之一是验证测试方法是否适合测试目的。在本研究中,验证参数是由国家和国际机构使用的测试和检验机构进行分类。作为对这些一般因素进行分类的结果,进行了方法验证参数,包括以下情况:1 .确认新的测试方法;2 .非标准化测试方法与标准化测试方法之间的比较;3 .确认需要进行测试方法验证等扩展的测试方法;4 .验证测试方法之间所需的相似性;5 .对先前验证的测试方法进行再验证。验证过程中应用的一般参数分类如下:特异性,选择性,线性度,灵敏度,准确度,精密度,检测限不确定度,定量限和范围。通过比较试验和检验机构应用的验证指南或指南参数,调查结果被认为对编制环境试验和检验方法的验证指南是有用的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of Method Validation for Test and Inspections
One of the most important purposes of a validation method is to verify whether a test method is suitable for the purpose of the test. In this study, validation parameters that are used by national and international institutes for test and inspection bodies are classified. As a result of classifying these general factors, method validation parameters were performed, including the following cases: 1 the confirmation of a new test method, 2 comparison between a non-standardized test method and standardized method, 3confirmation of a test method needing such extensions as a test method verification, verification of the test method applied between other test institutes or analysts, 4 verification of the required similarity between test methods, and 5 revalidation of the previously verified test methods. The general parameters applied in the validation processes were classified as follows; specificity, selectivity, linearity, sensitivity, accuracy, precision, detection limit uncertainty, quantitative limit, and range. By a comparison of the validation guidelines or guideline parameters applied by the test and inspection bodies, the survey results were considered to be useful in preparing validation guidelines for environmental testing and inspection methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Characteristics of Volatile Organic Compounds Distribution in Downtown Ansan Near Industrial Complexes Global Performance, Trends, and Challenges for Assessment and Management of Per- and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFASs): A Critical Review Examination of the Utility of Environmental DNA Metabarcoding for Monitoring Fish Species in Han Rivr, Korea Distribution and Risk Assessment of Perfluoroalkyl and Polyfluoroalkyl Substances (PFAS) in the South Han River Analysis and Change in Concentration of Micropollutants in Stream Affected by WWTP Effluents using Portable Composite Sampler and LC-HRMS
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1