投入产出分析下的产业发展:印尼两大产业的投资模拟

IF 5.6 2区 经济学 Q1 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-17
F. Firmansyah, S. Oktavilia, S. Handayani
{"title":"投入产出分析下的产业发展:印尼两大产业的投资模拟","authors":"F. Firmansyah, S. Oktavilia, S. Handayani","doi":"10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The similarity of the industrial structure of the main industries in two neighboring regencies, Wonosobo and Temanggung, Indonesia, is expected to result in equality demand for intermediate and primary inputs. The neighbouring regencies are located in the mountainous area and had similarities in economic structure. The goals of this study were to analyse the economic structure, select 5 main sectors in each district, and compare the impact of the economic investment on the main sectors in order to identify the effectiveness of the investment in the same production sector in the context of its impact on the economy. This research employed independent Input-Output analysis using the 2016 Input-Output Tables of Wonosobo and Temanggung regencies to evaluate the flow of intersectoral transactions and develop a multiplier analysis to determine development strategies which are shock injections applied to each region. This study hypothesises that the increase of sectoral investments increases output which is relatively the same in 5 corresponding industries in both regions. The obtained results showed that the selected main sector included Trade, Other Food and Beverage Industries, Building, and Wood and Wood Materials Industries. The investment on the main industrial sector led to a higher improvement in Temanggung rather than in Wonosobo. By simulating investment policies in two adjoining regencies, the optimally economic impact on each region and the cooperation approach used to carry out development planning can be assessed.","PeriodicalId":47897,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society","volume":"81 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Industries Development with the Input-Output Analysis: Investment Simulation on Two Regencies in Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"F. Firmansyah, S. Oktavilia, S. Handayani\",\"doi\":\"10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The similarity of the industrial structure of the main industries in two neighboring regencies, Wonosobo and Temanggung, Indonesia, is expected to result in equality demand for intermediate and primary inputs. The neighbouring regencies are located in the mountainous area and had similarities in economic structure. The goals of this study were to analyse the economic structure, select 5 main sectors in each district, and compare the impact of the economic investment on the main sectors in order to identify the effectiveness of the investment in the same production sector in the context of its impact on the economy. This research employed independent Input-Output analysis using the 2016 Input-Output Tables of Wonosobo and Temanggung regencies to evaluate the flow of intersectoral transactions and develop a multiplier analysis to determine development strategies which are shock injections applied to each region. This study hypothesises that the increase of sectoral investments increases output which is relatively the same in 5 corresponding industries in both regions. The obtained results showed that the selected main sector included Trade, Other Food and Beverage Industries, Building, and Wood and Wood Materials Industries. The investment on the main industrial sector led to a higher improvement in Temanggung rather than in Wonosobo. By simulating investment policies in two adjoining regencies, the optimally economic impact on each region and the cooperation approach used to carry out development planning can be assessed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47897,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-17\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Regions Economy and Society","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-17","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

印度尼西亚的沃诺索博和特曼贡两个邻近地区的主要产业的产业结构相似,预计将导致对中间和初级投入的需求相等。邻近的县域都位于山区,经济结构有相似之处。本研究的目标是分析经济结构,选择每个地区的5个主要部门,并比较经济投资对主要部门的影响,以便在其对经济影响的背景下确定同一生产部门投资的有效性。本研究采用了独立的投入产出分析,使用了2016年Wonosobo县和Temanggung县的投入产出表来评估部门间交易的流动,并开发了一个乘数分析,以确定适用于每个地区的发展战略。本研究假设部门投资的增加增加了产出,这在两个地区的5个相应行业中是相对相同的。所得结果表明,选择的主要行业包括贸易、其他食品和饮料工业、建筑、木材和木材材料工业。对主要工业部门的投资导致Temanggung比Wonosobo有更高的改善。通过模拟两个相邻县域的投资政策,可以评估对每个区域的最佳经济影响以及用于实施发展规划的合作方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Industries Development with the Input-Output Analysis: Investment Simulation on Two Regencies in Indonesia
The similarity of the industrial structure of the main industries in two neighboring regencies, Wonosobo and Temanggung, Indonesia, is expected to result in equality demand for intermediate and primary inputs. The neighbouring regencies are located in the mountainous area and had similarities in economic structure. The goals of this study were to analyse the economic structure, select 5 main sectors in each district, and compare the impact of the economic investment on the main sectors in order to identify the effectiveness of the investment in the same production sector in the context of its impact on the economy. This research employed independent Input-Output analysis using the 2016 Input-Output Tables of Wonosobo and Temanggung regencies to evaluate the flow of intersectoral transactions and develop a multiplier analysis to determine development strategies which are shock injections applied to each region. This study hypothesises that the increase of sectoral investments increases output which is relatively the same in 5 corresponding industries in both regions. The obtained results showed that the selected main sector included Trade, Other Food and Beverage Industries, Building, and Wood and Wood Materials Industries. The investment on the main industrial sector led to a higher improvement in Temanggung rather than in Wonosobo. By simulating investment policies in two adjoining regencies, the optimally economic impact on each region and the cooperation approach used to carry out development planning can be assessed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.90
自引率
4.50%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
The polarisation of Italian metropolitan areas, 2000–2018: structural change, technology and growth Rural areas as winners of COVID-19, digitalization and remote working? Empirical evidence from recent internal migration in Germany Firm interconnectedness and resilience: evidence from the Italian manufacturing Construction minerals as part of an urban circular economy? A multi-scalar study of the city of Oslo and its hinterland Localised waste reduction networks, global destruction networks and the circular economy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1