东努沙登加拉省国家主导的森林发展和社会抗议

IF 1.7 Q2 FORESTRY Forest and Society Pub Date : 2021-07-09 DOI:10.24259/FS.V5I2.11320
Didimus Dedi Dhosa
{"title":"东努沙登加拉省国家主导的森林发展和社会抗议","authors":"Didimus Dedi Dhosa","doi":"10.24259/FS.V5I2.11320","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research examines models of social resistances in response to top-down forest governance in the provincial government of East Nusa Tenggara Province,  Indonesia. The researcher demonstrates the models of (1) forest management and (2) people’s resistance against the regional government.The author found three fundamental problems through the perspectives of the right to the governing authority of the state and social resistance. First, the provincial government monopolise forest management since 1982 for cattle breeding.  Instead of offering prosperity to the people, this forest management model excludes the people from the forest and cattle resources. Second, when the signed contract ended, the local residents refused to extend forest management concessions to the provincial government. Third, the refusal by the residents was carried out through various forms of social movements and cultural politics. However, the provincial government mobilised the police, the civil service police, and the armed forces to intimidate the resistant communities.","PeriodicalId":43213,"journal":{"name":"Forest and Society","volume":"67 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"State-led Forest Development and Social Protest in East Nusa Tenggara Province\",\"authors\":\"Didimus Dedi Dhosa\",\"doi\":\"10.24259/FS.V5I2.11320\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This research examines models of social resistances in response to top-down forest governance in the provincial government of East Nusa Tenggara Province,  Indonesia. The researcher demonstrates the models of (1) forest management and (2) people’s resistance against the regional government.The author found three fundamental problems through the perspectives of the right to the governing authority of the state and social resistance. First, the provincial government monopolise forest management since 1982 for cattle breeding.  Instead of offering prosperity to the people, this forest management model excludes the people from the forest and cattle resources. Second, when the signed contract ended, the local residents refused to extend forest management concessions to the provincial government. Third, the refusal by the residents was carried out through various forms of social movements and cultural politics. However, the provincial government mobilised the police, the civil service police, and the armed forces to intimidate the resistant communities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forest and Society\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forest and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24259/FS.V5I2.11320\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forest and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24259/FS.V5I2.11320","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了印度尼西亚东努沙登加拉省省政府对自上而下的森林治理的社会抵抗模式。研究人员展示了(1)森林管理和(2)人民反抗地方政府的模式。作者通过对国家统治权和社会反抗的视角,发现了三个根本性的问题。首先,自1982年以来,省政府垄断了养牛的森林经营。这种森林经营模式没有给人民带来富裕,而是把人民排除在森林和牲畜资源之外。第二,当签订的合同结束时,当地居民拒绝将森林经营特许权延长给省政府。第三,居民的拒绝是通过各种形式的社会运动和文化政治进行的。然而,省政府动员了警察、公务员警察和武装部队来恐吓抵抗的社区。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
State-led Forest Development and Social Protest in East Nusa Tenggara Province
This research examines models of social resistances in response to top-down forest governance in the provincial government of East Nusa Tenggara Province,  Indonesia. The researcher demonstrates the models of (1) forest management and (2) people’s resistance against the regional government.The author found three fundamental problems through the perspectives of the right to the governing authority of the state and social resistance. First, the provincial government monopolise forest management since 1982 for cattle breeding.  Instead of offering prosperity to the people, this forest management model excludes the people from the forest and cattle resources. Second, when the signed contract ended, the local residents refused to extend forest management concessions to the provincial government. Third, the refusal by the residents was carried out through various forms of social movements and cultural politics. However, the provincial government mobilised the police, the civil service police, and the armed forces to intimidate the resistant communities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Forest and Society
Forest and Society FORESTRY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
35.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
23 weeks
期刊最新文献
The Good Life: Agriculture Transformation and the Pursuance of Goals in Two Rural Villages of Northeastern Thailand Emergent Institutional Issues from New Tenure Reforms and Social-Forestry Initiatives in Indonesia: Notes from The Field Fish, Freshwater, and the Promise of Biodiversity History for Indonesian Studies Placing the Commoning First: Getting Beyond the Patronage Trap in Natural Resource Decentralization Policies Assessing Indigenous Forest Management in Mount Merapi National Park Based on Ostrom’s Design Principles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1