引入临床药师指导ICU临床用药效果探讨

Dalai Wuyun
{"title":"引入临床药师指导ICU临床用药效果探讨","authors":"Dalai Wuyun","doi":"10.18686/AEM.V10I1.186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: to investigate the effect of clinical pharmacists in ICU. Methods: 108 ICU patients from January 2018 to March 2020 were divided into the control group and the observation group, with 54 cases in each group. The control group used the previous medication route, while the observation group introduced clinical pharmacists to guide clinical medication. The infection rate and adverse reaction rate of the two groups were compared. Results: the infection rate of the observation group was 3.70%, and that of the control group was 14.81%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The adverse reaction rate of the observation group was 5.56%, and that of the control group was 18.52%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: the introduction of clinical pharmacists to guide clinical medication in ICU can effectively control the infection, and reduce various adverse reactions during drug use, so as to realize the scientific and standardized use of drugs, and improve the efficiency and safety of drug use.","PeriodicalId":94293,"journal":{"name":"Advanced journal of emergency medicine","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussion on the Effect of Introducing Clinical Pharmacists to Guide Clinical Medication in ICU\",\"authors\":\"Dalai Wuyun\",\"doi\":\"10.18686/AEM.V10I1.186\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: to investigate the effect of clinical pharmacists in ICU. Methods: 108 ICU patients from January 2018 to March 2020 were divided into the control group and the observation group, with 54 cases in each group. The control group used the previous medication route, while the observation group introduced clinical pharmacists to guide clinical medication. The infection rate and adverse reaction rate of the two groups were compared. Results: the infection rate of the observation group was 3.70%, and that of the control group was 14.81%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The adverse reaction rate of the observation group was 5.56%, and that of the control group was 18.52%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: the introduction of clinical pharmacists to guide clinical medication in ICU can effectively control the infection, and reduce various adverse reactions during drug use, so as to realize the scientific and standardized use of drugs, and improve the efficiency and safety of drug use.\",\"PeriodicalId\":94293,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advanced journal of emergency medicine\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advanced journal of emergency medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18686/AEM.V10I1.186\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advanced journal of emergency medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18686/AEM.V10I1.186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:探讨临床药师在ICU工作中的作用。方法:将2018年1月~ 2020年3月收治的ICU患者108例分为对照组和观察组,每组54例。对照组沿用原用药路线,观察组引入临床药师指导临床用药。比较两组患者的感染率和不良反应发生率。结果:观察组感染率为3.70%,对照组感染率为14.81%,显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。观察组不良反应发生率为5.56%,对照组为18.52%,两组不良反应发生率均显著低于对照组(P<0.05)。结论:ICU引入临床药师指导临床用药,可有效控制感染,减少用药过程中的各种不良反应,实现药物使用的科学化、规范化,提高用药效率和安全性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Discussion on the Effect of Introducing Clinical Pharmacists to Guide Clinical Medication in ICU
Objective: to investigate the effect of clinical pharmacists in ICU. Methods: 108 ICU patients from January 2018 to March 2020 were divided into the control group and the observation group, with 54 cases in each group. The control group used the previous medication route, while the observation group introduced clinical pharmacists to guide clinical medication. The infection rate and adverse reaction rate of the two groups were compared. Results: the infection rate of the observation group was 3.70%, and that of the control group was 14.81%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). The adverse reaction rate of the observation group was 5.56%, and that of the control group was 18.52%, which was significantly lower than that of the control group (P<0.05). Conclusion: the introduction of clinical pharmacists to guide clinical medication in ICU can effectively control the infection, and reduce various adverse reactions during drug use, so as to realize the scientific and standardized use of drugs, and improve the efficiency and safety of drug use.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Discussion on the Effect of Introducing Clinical Pharmacists to Guide Clinical Medication in ICU Application of Microscrew Implant Anchorage in Orthodontics Application Effect of Limited Fluid Resuscitation in Emergency Patients with Multiple Trauma Complicated with Shock Relationship between Ambulatory Pulse Pressure, Pulse Pressure Index and Coronary Artery Disease in Patients with Hypertension The Impact of Deep Brain Stimulation on the Cognitive Ability of Patients with Parkinson Disease
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1