{"title":"10种语言文本录入实验中3种短语采样方法的系统比较","authors":"Germán Sanchis-Trilles, Luis A. Leiva","doi":"10.1145/2628363.2634229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Today's reference datasets for conducting text entry experiments are only available in English, which may lead to misleading results when testing text entry methods with non-native English speakers. We compared 3 automated phrase sampling methods available in the literature: Random, Ngram, and MemRep. It was found that MemRep performs best according to a statistical analysis and qualitative observations. This resulted in a collection of 30 datasets across 10 major languages, and we wish to share them with the community via this paper.","PeriodicalId":74207,"journal":{"name":"MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)","volume":"31 1","pages":"537-542"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A systematic comparison of 3 phrase sampling methods for text entry experiments in 10 languages\",\"authors\":\"Germán Sanchis-Trilles, Luis A. Leiva\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2628363.2634229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Today's reference datasets for conducting text entry experiments are only available in English, which may lead to misleading results when testing text entry methods with non-native English speakers. We compared 3 automated phrase sampling methods available in the literature: Random, Ngram, and MemRep. It was found that MemRep performs best according to a statistical analysis and qualitative observations. This resulted in a collection of 30 datasets across 10 major languages, and we wish to share them with the community via this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":74207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"537-542\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2634229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"MobileHCI : proceedings of the ... International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices and Services. MobileHCI (Conference)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2628363.2634229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A systematic comparison of 3 phrase sampling methods for text entry experiments in 10 languages
Today's reference datasets for conducting text entry experiments are only available in English, which may lead to misleading results when testing text entry methods with non-native English speakers. We compared 3 automated phrase sampling methods available in the literature: Random, Ngram, and MemRep. It was found that MemRep performs best according to a statistical analysis and qualitative observations. This resulted in a collection of 30 datasets across 10 major languages, and we wish to share them with the community via this paper.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
