将巴布亚新几内亚的小农与小额信贷提供者联系起来:参与式行动研究方法

IF 0.3 Q4 AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY Australasian Agribusiness Review Pub Date : 2013-01-01 DOI:10.22004/AG.ECON.206165
Hui-Shung Chang, Eleo Dowa, R. Malie, C. Anton, Iga Anamo, Peter Dekene, Debra Bubun
{"title":"将巴布亚新几内亚的小农与小额信贷提供者联系起来:参与式行动研究方法","authors":"Hui-Shung Chang, Eleo Dowa, R. Malie, C. Anton, Iga Anamo, Peter Dekene, Debra Bubun","doi":"10.22004/AG.ECON.206165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A participatory action research (PAR) approach was used to address the priority issue of lack of access to credit identified by smallholder farmers in Papua New Guinea. Following the cyclic process of research-planning-action-reflection, the research team conducted a thorough mapping of the supply chains in the first stage of the cycle. The results from the research were then presented to key players along the supply chain at a stakeholder workshop, where priority issues were identified and action plans to address them were developed. Action plans were implemented by the research team in collaboration with relevant stakeholders. Outcomes from this stage were then presented and evaluated at a second stake holder workshop. Necessary remedial actions were developed and implemented to address remaining issues, and from here another round of PAR began. The main lesson learned was that PAR, when applied to international agricultural research projects, has the benefit of stakeholders identifying local problems and locally appropriate solutions, but its drawbacks include the lack of capacity and support services on the ground. To improve outcomes, more resources are required to build extension and development capacities on the ground.","PeriodicalId":41561,"journal":{"name":"Australasian Agribusiness Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2013-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Linking smallholder farmers to microcredit providers in Papua New Guinea: A participatory action research approach\",\"authors\":\"Hui-Shung Chang, Eleo Dowa, R. Malie, C. Anton, Iga Anamo, Peter Dekene, Debra Bubun\",\"doi\":\"10.22004/AG.ECON.206165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A participatory action research (PAR) approach was used to address the priority issue of lack of access to credit identified by smallholder farmers in Papua New Guinea. Following the cyclic process of research-planning-action-reflection, the research team conducted a thorough mapping of the supply chains in the first stage of the cycle. The results from the research were then presented to key players along the supply chain at a stakeholder workshop, where priority issues were identified and action plans to address them were developed. Action plans were implemented by the research team in collaboration with relevant stakeholders. Outcomes from this stage were then presented and evaluated at a second stake holder workshop. Necessary remedial actions were developed and implemented to address remaining issues, and from here another round of PAR began. The main lesson learned was that PAR, when applied to international agricultural research projects, has the benefit of stakeholders identifying local problems and locally appropriate solutions, but its drawbacks include the lack of capacity and support services on the ground. To improve outcomes, more resources are required to build extension and development capacities on the ground.\",\"PeriodicalId\":41561,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australasian Agribusiness Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australasian Agribusiness Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.206165\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australasian Agribusiness Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22004/AG.ECON.206165","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

采用了参与性行动研究方法来解决巴布亚新几内亚小农确定的无法获得信贷的优先问题。在研究-计划-行动-反思的循环过程中,研究团队在循环的第一阶段对供应链进行了全面的映射。研究结果随后在利益相关者研讨会上呈现给供应链上的关键参与者,在那里确定了优先问题,并制定了解决这些问题的行动计划。行动计划由研究小组与相关利益攸关方合作实施。这一阶段的成果随后在第二次利益相关者研讨会上进行了介绍和评估。制定和实施了必要的补救行动,以解决剩余的问题,并从这里开始了另一轮PAR。得到的主要教训是,PAR在应用于国际农业研究项目时,有利于利益相关者发现当地问题和适合当地的解决方案,但是它的缺点包括缺乏实地能力和支持服务。为了改善成果,需要更多的资源在实地建设推广和发展能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Linking smallholder farmers to microcredit providers in Papua New Guinea: A participatory action research approach
A participatory action research (PAR) approach was used to address the priority issue of lack of access to credit identified by smallholder farmers in Papua New Guinea. Following the cyclic process of research-planning-action-reflection, the research team conducted a thorough mapping of the supply chains in the first stage of the cycle. The results from the research were then presented to key players along the supply chain at a stakeholder workshop, where priority issues were identified and action plans to address them were developed. Action plans were implemented by the research team in collaboration with relevant stakeholders. Outcomes from this stage were then presented and evaluated at a second stake holder workshop. Necessary remedial actions were developed and implemented to address remaining issues, and from here another round of PAR began. The main lesson learned was that PAR, when applied to international agricultural research projects, has the benefit of stakeholders identifying local problems and locally appropriate solutions, but its drawbacks include the lack of capacity and support services on the ground. To improve outcomes, more resources are required to build extension and development capacities on the ground.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Australasian Agribusiness Review
Australasian Agribusiness Review AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS & POLICY-
自引率
33.30%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Measuring the Returns to Investment in RD&E in the WA Grains Industry Using Equilibrium Displacement Modelling Financing Agricultural Value Chain RDE: An Alternative Approach with Examples from the Red Meat Industry Updating and Recalibrating Equilibrium Displacement Models of the Australian Livestock Industries: Beef Taking Stock: Identifying the Growing Agricultural Service Sector in Australia Specifying and Testing an Equilibrium Displacement Model of the Coconut Market in Sri Lanka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1