GEM健康模型:基于广义经验方法的模型-第二部分-背景

P. Daly
{"title":"GEM健康模型:基于广义经验方法的模型-第二部分-背景","authors":"P. Daly","doi":"10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1726","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I discuss background issues of worldview and method that underlie the GEM model of health. First, I present Bernard Lonergan’s account of emergent probability, a differentiated and developmental worldview that stands in sharp contrast to the inadequately differentiated viewpoints of materialism and dualism discussed in Part 1. This opens up a new way for the GEM model to approach questions of health that stands in sharp contrast to the way that the standard biomedical model and alternative hybrid models approach these questions. Second, I present Lonergan’s account of generalized empirical method, a unified method for investigating the natural and historical dimensions of the world in which we live and seek to thrive.","PeriodicalId":72966,"journal":{"name":"European journal for person centered healthcare","volume":"63 1","pages":"426-431"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The GEM model of health: a model based on generalized empirical method – Part 2 – Background\",\"authors\":\"P. Daly\",\"doi\":\"10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1726\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I discuss background issues of worldview and method that underlie the GEM model of health. First, I present Bernard Lonergan’s account of emergent probability, a differentiated and developmental worldview that stands in sharp contrast to the inadequately differentiated viewpoints of materialism and dualism discussed in Part 1. This opens up a new way for the GEM model to approach questions of health that stands in sharp contrast to the way that the standard biomedical model and alternative hybrid models approach these questions. Second, I present Lonergan’s account of generalized empirical method, a unified method for investigating the natural and historical dimensions of the world in which we live and seek to thrive.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72966,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European journal for person centered healthcare\",\"volume\":\"63 1\",\"pages\":\"426-431\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European journal for person centered healthcare\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1726\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal for person centered healthcare","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5750/EJPCH.V7I3.1726","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,我讨论了作为GEM健康模式基础的世界观和方法的背景问题。首先,我将介绍伯纳德·洛纳根(Bernard Lonergan)对涌现概率的描述,这是一种分化和发展的世界观,与第一部分中讨论的不充分分化的唯物主义和二元论观点形成鲜明对比。这为GEM模型处理健康问题开辟了一条新途径,与标准生物医学模型和替代混合模型处理这些问题的方式形成鲜明对比。其次,我介绍了Lonergan对广义经验方法的描述,这是一种统一的方法,用于调查我们生活和寻求繁荣的世界的自然和历史维度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The GEM model of health: a model based on generalized empirical method – Part 2 – Background
In this paper I discuss background issues of worldview and method that underlie the GEM model of health. First, I present Bernard Lonergan’s account of emergent probability, a differentiated and developmental worldview that stands in sharp contrast to the inadequately differentiated viewpoints of materialism and dualism discussed in Part 1. This opens up a new way for the GEM model to approach questions of health that stands in sharp contrast to the way that the standard biomedical model and alternative hybrid models approach these questions. Second, I present Lonergan’s account of generalized empirical method, a unified method for investigating the natural and historical dimensions of the world in which we live and seek to thrive.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ethical and epistemic roles of narrative in person-centred healthcare Person-Centred Healthcare versus Patient Centricity - what is the difference and how are pharmaceutical companies aiming to secure internal representation of the patient voice? Moving past phronesis: clinical reasoning in person-centered care Persons over models: shared decision-making for person-centered medicine lifestyle and degeneracy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1