富血小板血浆治疗肩腱病:系统回顾

Pooja Pithadia, Sharmila S.Tulpule, M. P. Surya
{"title":"富血小板血浆治疗肩腱病:系统回顾","authors":"Pooja Pithadia, Sharmila S.Tulpule, M. P. Surya","doi":"10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(5).149","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: There is afascinating interest inplatelet-rich plasma (PRP)injection as a treatment for shoulder tendinopathy. Objective: To determine the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for shoulder tendinopathycompared with other existing conventional methods. Design: Systematic review Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Librarypublished up to October 15, 2020 Study Eligibility Criteria:Randomized controlled trials, single-arm interventional study, and a prospective open-label study comparing PRP with conventional methods (saline, sham injection, dry needling, corticosteroid. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physiotherapy, and hyaluronic acid) in patients with shoulder tendinopathy. The search included only in vivo studies and excludednon-human studies. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: A systematic review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The authors reviewed and tabulated data according to the year of study and journal, study type and level of evidence, study population, intervention, outcomes, and interpretation. Results: Among the 228 records screened, 11 studies were included in the systematic review study. The selected studies focused on the application of PRP in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathy. Among 11 studies, 9 studies demonstrated favourable outcomes such as improved pain and functional scoresafter the PRP application for shoulder tendinopathy. In two studies, no statistically significant differences were seen regarding clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Injection of PRP is more efficacious than control injections in patients with shoulder tendinopathy.","PeriodicalId":13740,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Platelet rich plasma therapy forshoulder tendinopathy: a systematicreview\",\"authors\":\"Pooja Pithadia, Sharmila S.Tulpule, M. P. Surya\",\"doi\":\"10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(5).149\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: There is afascinating interest inplatelet-rich plasma (PRP)injection as a treatment for shoulder tendinopathy. Objective: To determine the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for shoulder tendinopathycompared with other existing conventional methods. Design: Systematic review Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Librarypublished up to October 15, 2020 Study Eligibility Criteria:Randomized controlled trials, single-arm interventional study, and a prospective open-label study comparing PRP with conventional methods (saline, sham injection, dry needling, corticosteroid. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physiotherapy, and hyaluronic acid) in patients with shoulder tendinopathy. The search included only in vivo studies and excludednon-human studies. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: A systematic review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The authors reviewed and tabulated data according to the year of study and journal, study type and level of evidence, study population, intervention, outcomes, and interpretation. Results: Among the 228 records screened, 11 studies were included in the systematic review study. The selected studies focused on the application of PRP in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathy. Among 11 studies, 9 studies demonstrated favourable outcomes such as improved pain and functional scoresafter the PRP application for shoulder tendinopathy. In two studies, no statistically significant differences were seen regarding clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Injection of PRP is more efficacious than control injections in patients with shoulder tendinopathy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13740,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(5).149\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37532/1758-4272.2021.16(5).149","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:富血小板血浆(PRP)注射作为治疗肩腱病的一种方法引起了人们的兴趣。目的:比较富血小板血浆(PRP)注射治疗肩关节肌腱病变与其他常规方法的疗效。设计:系统评价数据来源:PubMed、Scopus、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆出版截止至2020年10月15日研究资格标准:随机对照试验、单臂介入研究和一项前瞻性开放标签研究,比较PRP与传统方法(生理盐水、假注射、干针、皮质类固醇)的差异。非甾体类抗炎药、物理治疗和透明质酸)在肩关节病变患者中的应用。该研究仅包括体内研究,不包括非人体研究。研究评价和综合方法:根据PRISMA声明进行系统评价。作者根据研究年份和期刊、研究类型和证据水平、研究人群、干预措施、结果和解释对数据进行了审查和制表。结果:在筛选的228条记录中,有11项研究被纳入系统评价研究。所选研究的重点是PRP在肩关节肌腱病变治疗中的应用。在11项研究中,9项研究显示了PRP应用于肩部肌腱病变后疼痛和功能评分改善等有利结果。在两项研究中,临床结果没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:肩关节肌腱病变患者注射PRP比对照注射更有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Platelet rich plasma therapy forshoulder tendinopathy: a systematicreview
Background: There is afascinating interest inplatelet-rich plasma (PRP)injection as a treatment for shoulder tendinopathy. Objective: To determine the efficacy of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections for shoulder tendinopathycompared with other existing conventional methods. Design: Systematic review Data Sources: PubMed, Scopus, EMBASE, and Cochrane Librarypublished up to October 15, 2020 Study Eligibility Criteria:Randomized controlled trials, single-arm interventional study, and a prospective open-label study comparing PRP with conventional methods (saline, sham injection, dry needling, corticosteroid. non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, physiotherapy, and hyaluronic acid) in patients with shoulder tendinopathy. The search included only in vivo studies and excludednon-human studies. Study Appraisal and Synthesis Methods: A systematic review was carried out in accordance with the PRISMA statement. The authors reviewed and tabulated data according to the year of study and journal, study type and level of evidence, study population, intervention, outcomes, and interpretation. Results: Among the 228 records screened, 11 studies were included in the systematic review study. The selected studies focused on the application of PRP in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathy. Among 11 studies, 9 studies demonstrated favourable outcomes such as improved pain and functional scoresafter the PRP application for shoulder tendinopathy. In two studies, no statistically significant differences were seen regarding clinical outcomes. Conclusions: Injection of PRP is more efficacious than control injections in patients with shoulder tendinopathy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Severe coronal re-infection and issuesof mechanisms, monitoring and therapy Treatment patterns and costs ofpatients with ankylosing spondylitisinitiating biologic therapy in taiwan ??? apopulation-based analysis Effectiveness of adalimumab versus infliximab in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: A randomized double blinded clinical trial Synovitis with pitting edema as the presenting manifestation of antisynthetase syndrome Demographic, clinical, and serological features of Iraqi patients with rheumatoid arthritis: evaluation of 470 patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1