菲律宾棘虎名称的正确权威及其模式标本的现状

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club Pub Date : 2023-03-06 DOI:10.25226/bboc.v143i1.2023.a10

R. Prŷs-Jones, Clive A. Slater

{"title":"菲律宾棘虎名称的正确权威及其模式标本的现状","authors":"R. Prŷs-Jones, Clive A. Slater","doi":"10.25226/bboc.v143i1.2023.a10","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary. From its description in 1863 until the 1920s, the authority for the name Spizaetus philippensis was almost universally agreed to be J. H. Gurney, but from the 1930s it has normally been ascribed to J. Gould. This paper demonstrates that this alteration of the authority was incorrect; it should be J. H. Gurney. The two syntypes of the taxon are currently held by the Natural History Museum at Tring.","PeriodicalId":38973,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club","volume":"20 1","pages":"136 - 138"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The correct authority for the name Spizaetus philippensis, and the status of its type specimens\",\"authors\":\"R. Prŷs-Jones, Clive A. Slater\",\"doi\":\"10.25226/bboc.v143i1.2023.a10\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Summary. From its description in 1863 until the 1920s, the authority for the name Spizaetus philippensis was almost universally agreed to be J. H. Gurney, but from the 1930s it has normally been ascribed to J. Gould. This paper demonstrates that this alteration of the authority was incorrect; it should be J. H. Gurney. The two syntypes of the taxon are currently held by the Natural History Museum at Tring.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38973,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"136 - 138\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v143i1.2023.a10\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Agricultural and Biological Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin of the British Ornithologists'' Club","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25226/bboc.v143i1.2023.a10","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

总结。从1863年对它的描述到20世纪20年代，人们几乎普遍认为菲律宾刺鼻虫这个名字的权威是j·h·格尼，但从20世纪30年代开始，它通常被认为是j·古尔德。本文论证了这种权力变更是不正确的;应该是j·h·格尼。该分类群的两个模式目前由特林的自然历史博物馆保存。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

The correct authority for the name Spizaetus philippensis, and the status of its type specimens

Summary. From its description in 1863 until the 1920s, the authority for the name Spizaetus philippensis was almost universally agreed to be J. H. Gurney, but from the 1930s it has normally been ascribed to J. Gould. This paper demonstrates that this alteration of the authority was incorrect; it should be J. H. Gurney. The two syntypes of the taxon are currently held by the Natural History Museum at Tring.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊