工具性哲学启发式

IF 0.5 Q4 COMMUNICATION Doxa Comunicacion Pub Date : 2023-07-05 DOI:10.18524/2410-2601.2022.1(37).281823
K. Raikhert
{"title":"工具性哲学启发式","authors":"K. Raikhert","doi":"10.18524/2410-2601.2022.1(37).281823","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study surveys the conceptions of philosophical heuristics of J. Baggini and P. S. Fosl, D. Dennett, A. Hájek, and R. Nozick. All conceptions surveyed in the study are instrumental. R. Nozick’s philosophical heuristics and A. Hájek’s philosophical heuristics ought to be considered “authentic” because R. Nozick and A. Hájek called them “the philosophical heuristics.” Those philosophical heuristics aim to solve (philosophical) problems and are rooted in the Decision theory. D. Dennett’s “philosophical heuristics” according to the A. H?jek’s classification is the so-called “hand tools of the mind,” consisting of intuitive pumps and other kinds of thought experiments, analogies, examples, labels, metaphors, and staging. The purpose of D. Dennett’s “philosophical heuristics” is to deliver non-precise instruments for thinking. The “philosophical heuristics” of Baggini and P. S. Fosl is a part of the so called “philosophers’ toolkit” and is represented by heuristic devices that are used to find out interesting things from which you can learn new knowledge. At the same time, the devices imply the use of some method of knowledge not for its intended purpose.","PeriodicalId":42106,"journal":{"name":"Doxa Comunicacion","volume":"43 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE INSTRUMENTAL PHILOSOPHICAL HEURISTICS\",\"authors\":\"K. Raikhert\",\"doi\":\"10.18524/2410-2601.2022.1(37).281823\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The study surveys the conceptions of philosophical heuristics of J. Baggini and P. S. Fosl, D. Dennett, A. Hájek, and R. Nozick. All conceptions surveyed in the study are instrumental. R. Nozick’s philosophical heuristics and A. Hájek’s philosophical heuristics ought to be considered “authentic” because R. Nozick and A. Hájek called them “the philosophical heuristics.” Those philosophical heuristics aim to solve (philosophical) problems and are rooted in the Decision theory. D. Dennett’s “philosophical heuristics” according to the A. H?jek’s classification is the so-called “hand tools of the mind,” consisting of intuitive pumps and other kinds of thought experiments, analogies, examples, labels, metaphors, and staging. The purpose of D. Dennett’s “philosophical heuristics” is to deliver non-precise instruments for thinking. The “philosophical heuristics” of Baggini and P. S. Fosl is a part of the so called “philosophers’ toolkit” and is represented by heuristic devices that are used to find out interesting things from which you can learn new knowledge. At the same time, the devices imply the use of some method of knowledge not for its intended purpose.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Doxa Comunicacion\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Doxa Comunicacion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18524/2410-2601.2022.1(37).281823\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Doxa Comunicacion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18524/2410-2601.2022.1(37).281823","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究考察了J.巴吉尼、P. S.福尔、D.丹尼特、A. Hájek和R.诺齐克的哲学启发式概念。本研究调查的所有概念都是工具性的。R.诺齐克的哲学启发式和A. Hájek的哲学启发式应该被认为是“可信的”,因为R.诺齐克和A. Hájek称它们为“哲学启发式”。这些哲学启发式旨在解决(哲学)问题,植根于决策理论。d.d ennett的"哲学启发式"根据a.h ?Jek的分类是所谓的“心灵的手工工具”,由直觉泵和其他类型的思想实验、类比、例子、标签、隐喻和分期组成。丹尼特的“哲学启发式”的目的是为思考提供不精确的工具。巴吉尼和p·s·福尔的“哲学启发式”是所谓的“哲学家工具箱”的一部分,以启发式手段为代表,用来发现有趣的事情,从中学习新知识。与此同时,这些设备意味着使用了一些知识方法,而不是为了其预期的目的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
THE INSTRUMENTAL PHILOSOPHICAL HEURISTICS
The study surveys the conceptions of philosophical heuristics of J. Baggini and P. S. Fosl, D. Dennett, A. Hájek, and R. Nozick. All conceptions surveyed in the study are instrumental. R. Nozick’s philosophical heuristics and A. Hájek’s philosophical heuristics ought to be considered “authentic” because R. Nozick and A. Hájek called them “the philosophical heuristics.” Those philosophical heuristics aim to solve (philosophical) problems and are rooted in the Decision theory. D. Dennett’s “philosophical heuristics” according to the A. H?jek’s classification is the so-called “hand tools of the mind,” consisting of intuitive pumps and other kinds of thought experiments, analogies, examples, labels, metaphors, and staging. The purpose of D. Dennett’s “philosophical heuristics” is to deliver non-precise instruments for thinking. The “philosophical heuristics” of Baggini and P. S. Fosl is a part of the so called “philosophers’ toolkit” and is represented by heuristic devices that are used to find out interesting things from which you can learn new knowledge. At the same time, the devices imply the use of some method of knowledge not for its intended purpose.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Doxa Comunicacion
Doxa Comunicacion COMMUNICATION-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
16.70%
发文量
38
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Distanciamento social A docência na pandemia Experiências exitosas de professores durante a pandemia de COVID-19 Violência simbólica contra as mulheres sob os holofotes da pandemia de COVID-19 Os desafios impostos à educação pela da pandemia do COVID-19 e as novas estratégias
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1