使用创造性的研究设计来调查社会关怀计划的结果,以获得卓越的服务

Q3 Social Sciences China Journal of Social Work Pub Date : 2022-07-20 DOI:10.1080/17525098.2022.2099600
H. Lo
{"title":"使用创造性的研究设计来调查社会关怀计划的结果,以获得卓越的服务","authors":"H. Lo","doi":"10.1080/17525098.2022.2099600","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT In this paper, the author has reviewed four pieces of practice research that aim to investigate the outcome of social care programmes. Special attention is given to the process where the concerns of social work practitioners and stakeholders, including academic supervisors, agency administrators, funders and policy makers involved in the dialogues. In addition to the requirement of rigour in study design, priority is given to the significance of the contribution to practice knowledge through adequately interpreting and disseminating research findings through dialogues. Based on the mapping of individual practitioner−researcher, exemplars of randomised controlled trial and clinical data mining in social care programme evaluation are selected to illustrate how they respond to the research questions in a specific practice setting.","PeriodicalId":38938,"journal":{"name":"China Journal of Social Work","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating outcomes of social care programmes using creative study designs for service excellence\",\"authors\":\"H. Lo\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/17525098.2022.2099600\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT In this paper, the author has reviewed four pieces of practice research that aim to investigate the outcome of social care programmes. Special attention is given to the process where the concerns of social work practitioners and stakeholders, including academic supervisors, agency administrators, funders and policy makers involved in the dialogues. In addition to the requirement of rigour in study design, priority is given to the significance of the contribution to practice knowledge through adequately interpreting and disseminating research findings through dialogues. Based on the mapping of individual practitioner−researcher, exemplars of randomised controlled trial and clinical data mining in social care programme evaluation are selected to illustrate how they respond to the research questions in a specific practice setting.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38938,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"China Journal of Social Work\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"China Journal of Social Work\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2022.2099600\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Journal of Social Work","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17525098.2022.2099600","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在本文中,作者回顾了四项旨在调查社会关怀计划结果的实践研究。特别关注社会工作从业者和利益相关者(包括学术主管、机构行政人员、资助者和参与对话的决策者)关注的过程。除了严谨的研究设计要求外,优先考虑通过对话充分解释和传播研究成果对实践知识的贡献的重要性。基于个体从业者-研究者的映射,选择了随机对照试验和临床数据挖掘在社会护理项目评估中的例子,以说明他们如何在特定的实践环境中回应研究问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigating outcomes of social care programmes using creative study designs for service excellence
ABSTRACT In this paper, the author has reviewed four pieces of practice research that aim to investigate the outcome of social care programmes. Special attention is given to the process where the concerns of social work practitioners and stakeholders, including academic supervisors, agency administrators, funders and policy makers involved in the dialogues. In addition to the requirement of rigour in study design, priority is given to the significance of the contribution to practice knowledge through adequately interpreting and disseminating research findings through dialogues. Based on the mapping of individual practitioner−researcher, exemplars of randomised controlled trial and clinical data mining in social care programme evaluation are selected to illustrate how they respond to the research questions in a specific practice setting.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
China Journal of Social Work
China Journal of Social Work Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
期刊最新文献
Decision making, assessment and risk in social work Decision making, assessment and risk in social work , 3rd ed., by Brian J. Taylor, London, SAGE, 2017, 256 pp., GBP 35.99 (paperback), ISBN 978-1-5264-0105-2 Social work theory and ethics: ideas in practiceSocial work theory and ethics: ideas in practice, edited by Dorothee Hölscher, Richard Hugman, and Donna McAuliffe, Singapore, Springer, 2023, 543 pp., EUR 249.99 (hbk), ISBN 978-981-19-1014-2 The development of community governance in China: involution and precarious professionalisation Practice research’s challenges and opportunities across project conceptualisation, implementation, and dissemination: a Singaporean case study Social justice as well-being: a radical rethinking of social work and social policy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1