记笔记作为解决数学中基于现实的任务的策略

IF 0.5 Q4 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education Pub Date : 2023-07-01 DOI:10.29333/iejme/13312
Lisa-Marie Wienecke, D. Leiss, T. Ehmke
{"title":"记笔记作为解决数学中基于现实的任务的策略","authors":"Lisa-Marie Wienecke, D. Leiss, T. Ehmke","doi":"10.29333/iejme/13312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study investigates the extent to which student and task-related characteristics are associated with different types of note-taking and analyzes how task success depends on these elements. For this purpose, a sample of n=866 students (age: mean=13.99) completing two reality-based tasks as part of a paper and pencil test are considered. The results demonstrate that the note-taking type differs significantly between the two parallel constructed tasks. For example, language skills (r=.26), interest in mathematics (r=.13), and the socio-economic statuses (r=.12) are observed to be significantly correlated to greater note-taking frequency. Based on linear regression (dependent variable: successful task solution), 34% of the variance is attributed to note-taking and other student characteristics. The most relevant predictor for a successful task solution (β=.36) is notes containing an elaboration of the given task information.","PeriodicalId":29770,"journal":{"name":"International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Taking notes as a strategy for solving reality-based tasks in mathematics\",\"authors\":\"Lisa-Marie Wienecke, D. Leiss, T. Ehmke\",\"doi\":\"10.29333/iejme/13312\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study investigates the extent to which student and task-related characteristics are associated with different types of note-taking and analyzes how task success depends on these elements. For this purpose, a sample of n=866 students (age: mean=13.99) completing two reality-based tasks as part of a paper and pencil test are considered. The results demonstrate that the note-taking type differs significantly between the two parallel constructed tasks. For example, language skills (r=.26), interest in mathematics (r=.13), and the socio-economic statuses (r=.12) are observed to be significantly correlated to greater note-taking frequency. Based on linear regression (dependent variable: successful task solution), 34% of the variance is attributed to note-taking and other student characteristics. The most relevant predictor for a successful task solution (β=.36) is notes containing an elaboration of the given task information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":29770,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13312\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29333/iejme/13312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究调查了学生和任务相关特征在多大程度上与不同类型的笔记相关联,并分析了任务成功是如何依赖于这些因素的。为此,考虑了n=866名学生(年龄:平均=13.99)的样本,他们完成了两个基于现实的任务,作为纸笔测试的一部分。结果表明,两种平行构建任务的笔记类型存在显著差异。例如,语言技能(r= 0.26)、对数学的兴趣(r= 0.13)和社会经济地位(r= 0.12)被观察到与更高的笔记频率显著相关。基于线性回归(因变量:成功的任务解决方案),34%的方差归因于记笔记和其他学生特征。一个成功的任务解决方案最相关的预测因子(β=.36)是包含给定任务信息的详细说明的注释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Taking notes as a strategy for solving reality-based tasks in mathematics
This study investigates the extent to which student and task-related characteristics are associated with different types of note-taking and analyzes how task success depends on these elements. For this purpose, a sample of n=866 students (age: mean=13.99) completing two reality-based tasks as part of a paper and pencil test are considered. The results demonstrate that the note-taking type differs significantly between the two parallel constructed tasks. For example, language skills (r=.26), interest in mathematics (r=.13), and the socio-economic statuses (r=.12) are observed to be significantly correlated to greater note-taking frequency. Based on linear regression (dependent variable: successful task solution), 34% of the variance is attributed to note-taking and other student characteristics. The most relevant predictor for a successful task solution (β=.36) is notes containing an elaboration of the given task information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnostic study of mathematical reasoning in novice university students Prior knowledge of a calculus course: The impact of prior knowledge on students’ errors Insights on usability testing: The effectiveness of an adaptive e-learning system for secondary school mathematics The potential of photography for mathematics education and research–A literature review Development and effectiveness of digital classroom assessment document for form one mathematics in secondary school
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1