小学教师长期从事现实数学教育的影响因素实证研究

Giang Thi Kieu Nguyen, Chau Thi Hai Pham
{"title":"小学教师长期从事现实数学教育的影响因素实证研究","authors":"Giang Thi Kieu Nguyen, Chau Thi Hai Pham","doi":"10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp1-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) is a re-emerging teaching and learning pedagogy approach that has gained a lot of momentum since 2016. Prior publications concentrated mostly on curriculum design and student achievement, while little attention was devoted to understanding teachers’ perceptions toward RME. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of factors that influence teachers' perceptions to adopt RME in the long term. Ten hypotheses were proposed and tested employing the Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA) technique. 226 primary school teachers from various regions were recruited to answer the questionnaires via Google Form. The experimental results validated six out of ten expected relationships between the factors in the extended self-determination theory model. That is, perceived competence affected confirmation, confirmation influenced both intrinsic motivation and satisfaction, intrinsic motivation influenced satisfaction, and satisfaction and parental involvement both were considered reliable predictors of realistic math education continuance intention. The remaining hypotheses were not validated, that is, autonomy, relatedness and competence were not found significant on intrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation did not influence RME continuance intention. Overall, the model explains 57.9% the amount of variance in the data. Administrators and policymakers are recommended to intervene on validated relationships to increase teachers' retention and long-term commitment to RME, whereas unsupported assumptions must be reexamined in the future.","PeriodicalId":37090,"journal":{"name":"Journal on Mathematics Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An empirical study of factors influencing primary school teachers' long-term commitment to Realistic Mathematics Education\",\"authors\":\"Giang Thi Kieu Nguyen, Chau Thi Hai Pham\",\"doi\":\"10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp1-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) is a re-emerging teaching and learning pedagogy approach that has gained a lot of momentum since 2016. Prior publications concentrated mostly on curriculum design and student achievement, while little attention was devoted to understanding teachers’ perceptions toward RME. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of factors that influence teachers' perceptions to adopt RME in the long term. Ten hypotheses were proposed and tested employing the Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA) technique. 226 primary school teachers from various regions were recruited to answer the questionnaires via Google Form. The experimental results validated six out of ten expected relationships between the factors in the extended self-determination theory model. That is, perceived competence affected confirmation, confirmation influenced both intrinsic motivation and satisfaction, intrinsic motivation influenced satisfaction, and satisfaction and parental involvement both were considered reliable predictors of realistic math education continuance intention. The remaining hypotheses were not validated, that is, autonomy, relatedness and competence were not found significant on intrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation did not influence RME continuance intention. Overall, the model explains 57.9% the amount of variance in the data. Administrators and policymakers are recommended to intervene on validated relationships to increase teachers' retention and long-term commitment to RME, whereas unsupported assumptions must be reexamined in the future.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37090,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal on Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal on Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp1-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Mathematics\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal on Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22342/jme.v14i1.pp1-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Mathematics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

现实主义数学教育(RME)是一种重新出现的教学和学习教学法,自2016年以来获得了很大的动力。先前的出版物主要集中在课程设计和学生成绩上,而很少关注理解教师对RME的看法。因此,本研究的目的是探讨影响教师长期采用RME观念的因素的影响。提出了十个假设,并采用广义结构化成分分析(GSCA)技术进行了检验。本研究以谷歌表格的形式,从全国各地选取226名小学教师进行问卷调查。实验结果验证了扩展自我决定理论模型中十个因素之间预期关系中的六个。即感知能力影响确认,确认影响内在动机和满意度,内在动机影响满意度,满意度和父母参与都被认为是现实数学教育继续意愿的可靠预测因子。其余假设未得到验证,即自主性、相关性和胜任性对内在动机的影响不显著,内在动机对RME继续意愿的影响不显著。总体而言,该模型解释了数据中57.9%的方差。建议管理人员和政策制定者对有效的关系进行干预,以提高教师的留任率和对RME的长期承诺,而不受支持的假设必须在未来重新审视。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An empirical study of factors influencing primary school teachers' long-term commitment to Realistic Mathematics Education
Realistic Mathematics Education (RME) is a re-emerging teaching and learning pedagogy approach that has gained a lot of momentum since 2016. Prior publications concentrated mostly on curriculum design and student achievement, while little attention was devoted to understanding teachers’ perceptions toward RME. Thus, the purpose of this study was to investigate the effects of factors that influence teachers' perceptions to adopt RME in the long term. Ten hypotheses were proposed and tested employing the Generalized Structured Component Analysis (GSCA) technique. 226 primary school teachers from various regions were recruited to answer the questionnaires via Google Form. The experimental results validated six out of ten expected relationships between the factors in the extended self-determination theory model. That is, perceived competence affected confirmation, confirmation influenced both intrinsic motivation and satisfaction, intrinsic motivation influenced satisfaction, and satisfaction and parental involvement both were considered reliable predictors of realistic math education continuance intention. The remaining hypotheses were not validated, that is, autonomy, relatedness and competence were not found significant on intrinsic motivation, and intrinsic motivation did not influence RME continuance intention. Overall, the model explains 57.9% the amount of variance in the data. Administrators and policymakers are recommended to intervene on validated relationships to increase teachers' retention and long-term commitment to RME, whereas unsupported assumptions must be reexamined in the future.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal on Mathematics Education
Journal on Mathematics Education Mathematics-Mathematics (all)
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
What explains early numeracy achievement: A comparison of South Africa and China Exploring default-interventionist interaction of thinking activity types on probability problem-solving Mathematics learning orientation: Mathematical creative thinking ability or creative disposition? Promoting socioeconomic equity through automatic formative assessment Aligning numeracy task design with SDG goals: Nutrition facts as a context for prospective mathematics teachers' problem posing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1