阅读方法对阅读理解效果的比较研究

I. Shahnaz, Sanjida Kabir
{"title":"阅读方法对阅读理解效果的比较研究","authors":"I. Shahnaz, Sanjida Kabir","doi":"10.3329/dujbs.v31i2.60881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present experiment investigated whether different reading methods would have any effect on reading comprehension performance. It was hypothesized that reading comprehensive performance would be better with subvocalization than other reading methods. The independent variable was reading methods and the dependent variable was performance (speed and accuracy). To conduct this experiment, 60 school students were taken with age ranges from 8 to 10 years. The Latin Square design was used to conduct this experiment. Recall scores were obtained for each participant in terms of four reading methods: silent reading, subvocalization, reading aloud and listening music while reading. Results of the One-way ANOVA and Post Hoc test showed that only reading time vary among four reading methods. Multiple comparisons showed that there is a significant difference in reading time between silent reading and reading aloud. So, the result did not support the hypothesis of subvocalization as a better reading method.\nDhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 31(2): 225-230, 2022 (July)","PeriodicalId":11095,"journal":{"name":"Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences","volume":"17 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Examining Comparative Effect of Reading Methods On Reading Comprehension\",\"authors\":\"I. Shahnaz, Sanjida Kabir\",\"doi\":\"10.3329/dujbs.v31i2.60881\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present experiment investigated whether different reading methods would have any effect on reading comprehension performance. It was hypothesized that reading comprehensive performance would be better with subvocalization than other reading methods. The independent variable was reading methods and the dependent variable was performance (speed and accuracy). To conduct this experiment, 60 school students were taken with age ranges from 8 to 10 years. The Latin Square design was used to conduct this experiment. Recall scores were obtained for each participant in terms of four reading methods: silent reading, subvocalization, reading aloud and listening music while reading. Results of the One-way ANOVA and Post Hoc test showed that only reading time vary among four reading methods. Multiple comparisons showed that there is a significant difference in reading time between silent reading and reading aloud. So, the result did not support the hypothesis of subvocalization as a better reading method.\\nDhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 31(2): 225-230, 2022 (July)\",\"PeriodicalId\":11095,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v31i2.60881\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Dhaka University Journal of Biological Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3329/dujbs.v31i2.60881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本实验旨在探讨不同的阅读方法对学生阅读理解能力的影响。假设默读比其他阅读方法能提高学生的阅读综合成绩。自变量为读取方法,因变量为性能(速度和准确性)。为了进行这个实验,我们选取了60名年龄在8到10岁之间的在校学生。本实验采用拉丁方阵设计。通过默读、默读、大声朗读和边读边听音乐四种阅读方法,获得了每位参与者的回忆分数。单因素方差分析和事后检验结果显示,四种阅读方法之间只有阅读时间不同。多项比较表明,默读和大声朗读在阅读时间上存在显著差异。因此,结果不支持默读是一种更好的阅读方法的假设。达卡大学。科学31(2):225- 230,2022 (7)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Examining Comparative Effect of Reading Methods On Reading Comprehension
The present experiment investigated whether different reading methods would have any effect on reading comprehension performance. It was hypothesized that reading comprehensive performance would be better with subvocalization than other reading methods. The independent variable was reading methods and the dependent variable was performance (speed and accuracy). To conduct this experiment, 60 school students were taken with age ranges from 8 to 10 years. The Latin Square design was used to conduct this experiment. Recall scores were obtained for each participant in terms of four reading methods: silent reading, subvocalization, reading aloud and listening music while reading. Results of the One-way ANOVA and Post Hoc test showed that only reading time vary among four reading methods. Multiple comparisons showed that there is a significant difference in reading time between silent reading and reading aloud. So, the result did not support the hypothesis of subvocalization as a better reading method. Dhaka Univ. J. Biol. Sci. 31(2): 225-230, 2022 (July)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Induction of mutation in Neurospora Crassa using neem (Azadirachta Indica A. Juss) leaf extract Assessing the relationship of prospective, retrospective, and everyday memory with cognitive failure among Bangladeshi adults Effect of COVID-19 pandemic on gender based violence: a study on TMSS microcredit members Exploring clinical features of children with autism in Bogura city of Bangladesh A taxonomic survey of pteridophytic flora of Lalmai Pahar and Mainamati of Cumilla district, Bangladesh
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1