44. 信息是否能够得到保护?

Marquette intellectual property law review Pub Date : 2014-09-01 DOI:10.1093/HE/9780198769958.003.0044

L. Bently, B. Sherman, D. Gangjee, Phillip Johnson

{"title":"44. 信息是否能够得到保护?","authors":"L. Bently, B. Sherman, D. Gangjee, Phillip Johnson","doi":"10.1093/HE/9780198769958.003.0044","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter looks at the type of information that is capable of being protected by the action for breach of confidence. More specifically, it examines four limitations placed on the type of information that may be protected under the action: where the information is trivial, immoral, vague, or in the public domain. It also considers the notion of ‘relative secrecy’ around which the breach of confidence, along with encrypted information and the so-called ‘springboard’ doctrine.","PeriodicalId":88929,"journal":{"name":"Marquette intellectual property law review","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"44. Is the information capable of being protected?\",\"authors\":\"L. Bently, B. Sherman, D. Gangjee, Phillip Johnson\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/HE/9780198769958.003.0044\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter looks at the type of information that is capable of being protected by the action for breach of confidence. More specifically, it examines four limitations placed on the type of information that may be protected under the action: where the information is trivial, immoral, vague, or in the public domain. It also considers the notion of ‘relative secrecy’ around which the breach of confidence, along with encrypted information and the so-called ‘springboard’ doctrine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88929,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Marquette intellectual property law review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Marquette intellectual property law review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198769958.003.0044\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Marquette intellectual property law review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/HE/9780198769958.003.0044","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本章探讨了可受失信行为保护的信息类型。更具体地说，它检查了可能在该行动下受到保护的信息类型的四个限制:信息是微不足道的，不道德的，模糊的，或在公共领域。它还考虑了“相对保密”的概念，以及加密信息和所谓的“跳板”原则。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

44. Is the information capable of being protected?

This chapter looks at the type of information that is capable of being protected by the action for breach of confidence. More specifically, it examines four limitations placed on the type of information that may be protected under the action: where the information is trivial, immoral, vague, or in the public domain. It also considers the notion of ‘relative secrecy’ around which the breach of confidence, along with encrypted information and the so-called ‘springboard’ doctrine.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Marquette intellectual property law review

自引率

0.00%

发文量