中小学教育工作者对干预的反应:探索性调查

S. King, C. Lemons
{"title":"中小学教育工作者对干预的反应:探索性调查","authors":"S. King, C. Lemons","doi":"10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I4-6147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Although increasingly implemented in elementary and secondary education settings, research provides limited insight into practitioners' knowledge of Response-to-Intervention (RTI) at the secondary level. This paper presents descriptive findings from an exploratory survey of teachers that assessed the relationship between the grade level of teachers (n = 609), their exposure to RTI, and the implementation of practices associated with RTI (e.g., progress monitoring). Results underscore differences in the perception and implementation of RTI in elementary and secondary schools. Implications related to more clearly defining RTI at the secondary level are discussed.","PeriodicalId":42442,"journal":{"name":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","volume":"30 1","pages":"189-199"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Response-to-Intervention at the Secondary and Elementary Level: An Exploratory Survey of Educators\",\"authors\":\"S. King, C. Lemons\",\"doi\":\"10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I4-6147\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Although increasingly implemented in elementary and secondary education settings, research provides limited insight into practitioners' knowledge of Response-to-Intervention (RTI) at the secondary level. This paper presents descriptive findings from an exploratory survey of teachers that assessed the relationship between the grade level of teachers (n = 609), their exposure to RTI, and the implementation of practices associated with RTI (e.g., progress monitoring). Results underscore differences in the perception and implementation of RTI in elementary and secondary schools. Implications related to more clearly defining RTI at the secondary level are discussed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42442,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"189-199\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I4-6147\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION, SPECIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Disabilities-A Multidisciplinary Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18666/LDMJ-2014-V20-I4-6147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EDUCATION, SPECIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

尽管越来越多地在小学和中学教育环境中实施,但研究对中等水平从业人员对干预反应(RTI)的了解有限。本文介绍了一项对教师进行的探索性调查的描述性结果,该调查评估了教师的年级水平(n = 609)、他们接触RTI的情况以及与RTI相关的实践(如进度监控)的实施之间的关系。结果强调了小学和中学对RTI的认知和实施的差异。讨论了在二级水平上更清楚地定义RTI的含义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Response-to-Intervention at the Secondary and Elementary Level: An Exploratory Survey of Educators
Although increasingly implemented in elementary and secondary education settings, research provides limited insight into practitioners' knowledge of Response-to-Intervention (RTI) at the secondary level. This paper presents descriptive findings from an exploratory survey of teachers that assessed the relationship between the grade level of teachers (n = 609), their exposure to RTI, and the implementation of practices associated with RTI (e.g., progress monitoring). Results underscore differences in the perception and implementation of RTI in elementary and secondary schools. Implications related to more clearly defining RTI at the secondary level are discussed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.20%
发文量
4
期刊最新文献
Response to Intervention as a Structuring Benchmark for Organizing Services for Students at Risk and With Learning Difficulties in Reading: A Multiple Case Study in Three Elementary Schools Supportive Environments Providing Social and Emotional Learning Explain Success in People with Learning Disabilities An Evidence Review of Key Transition Components for Students with Learning Disabilities Modified Student Success Skills for Students with Learning Disabilities: A Pilot Study Culturally Sustaining Mathematics for Dual Language Learners in a Multitiered System of Supports
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1