管理信息获取途径的比较调查

A. Asemi, A. Akbari, A. Asemi
{"title":"管理信息获取途径的比较调查","authors":"A. Asemi, A. Akbari, A. Asemi","doi":"10.1109/dchpc55044.2022.9731842","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main objective of the paper was a comparative investigation of acquiring management data by the managers of the Tehran Universities Central Library's (TUCL) which are under the supervision of the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology (MSRT) & the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MHME) located in Tehran in different managerial levels of these libraries. The comparative survey method is used in the current study and to collect data, researcher-made questionnaires were employed. The data were analyzed in two levels using Minitab software. Findings of the research suggested that middle managers mainly preferred to utilize the workers' reports and operational managers used the internet as their informational resources. Regarding applying the information both preferred planning most and authoring and research, least. Middle managers and operational managers' main priority to get information was to contact experts and surf on the internet, respectively and their last priority was using the personal library. Regarding communication methods, both groups mainly preferred phone most and attending conferences last. In addition to guiding information science experts, the results of the current study can give insights to the designers and experts of the management information systems (MISs) in designing user-friendly systems.","PeriodicalId":59014,"journal":{"name":"高性能计算技术","volume":"36 1","pages":"31-39"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative survey on the ways of access to managerial information\",\"authors\":\"A. Asemi, A. Akbari, A. Asemi\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/dchpc55044.2022.9731842\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main objective of the paper was a comparative investigation of acquiring management data by the managers of the Tehran Universities Central Library's (TUCL) which are under the supervision of the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology (MSRT) & the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MHME) located in Tehran in different managerial levels of these libraries. The comparative survey method is used in the current study and to collect data, researcher-made questionnaires were employed. The data were analyzed in two levels using Minitab software. Findings of the research suggested that middle managers mainly preferred to utilize the workers' reports and operational managers used the internet as their informational resources. Regarding applying the information both preferred planning most and authoring and research, least. Middle managers and operational managers' main priority to get information was to contact experts and surf on the internet, respectively and their last priority was using the personal library. Regarding communication methods, both groups mainly preferred phone most and attending conferences last. In addition to guiding information science experts, the results of the current study can give insights to the designers and experts of the management information systems (MISs) in designing user-friendly systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":59014,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"高性能计算技术\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"31-39\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"高性能计算技术\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1093\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/dchpc55044.2022.9731842\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"高性能计算技术","FirstCategoryId":"1093","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/dchpc55044.2022.9731842","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文的主要目的是对位于德黑兰的德黑兰大学中央图书馆(TUCL)的管理人员获取管理数据进行比较调查,这些图书馆受科学、研究和技术部(MSRT)和卫生和医学教育部(MHME)的监督,处于这些图书馆的不同管理级别。本研究采用比较调查的方法,并采用研究者自行制作的问卷来收集数据。采用Minitab软件分两个层次对数据进行分析。研究发现,中层管理者主要倾向于利用员工报告,运营管理者则将互联网作为信息资源。在应用信息方面,最倾向于规划,而最少倾向于写作和研究。中层管理人员和业务经理获取信息的主要优先事项分别是联系专家和上网,最后优先事项是使用个人图书馆。在沟通方式上,两组人都最喜欢电话,最后参加会议。本研究的结果除了对资讯科学专家有指导意义外,也可为管理资讯系统的设计者及专家设计用户友好型系统提供参考。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparative survey on the ways of access to managerial information
The main objective of the paper was a comparative investigation of acquiring management data by the managers of the Tehran Universities Central Library's (TUCL) which are under the supervision of the Ministry of Science, Research, and Technology (MSRT) & the Ministry of Health and Medical Education (MHME) located in Tehran in different managerial levels of these libraries. The comparative survey method is used in the current study and to collect data, researcher-made questionnaires were employed. The data were analyzed in two levels using Minitab software. Findings of the research suggested that middle managers mainly preferred to utilize the workers' reports and operational managers used the internet as their informational resources. Regarding applying the information both preferred planning most and authoring and research, least. Middle managers and operational managers' main priority to get information was to contact experts and surf on the internet, respectively and their last priority was using the personal library. Regarding communication methods, both groups mainly preferred phone most and attending conferences last. In addition to guiding information science experts, the results of the current study can give insights to the designers and experts of the management information systems (MISs) in designing user-friendly systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1121
期刊最新文献
The AHP-TOPSIS based DSS for selecting suppliers of information resources A mutual one-time password for online application Impact of Artificial Intelligence in COVID-19 Pandemic: A Comprehensive Review Structure and criteria defining business value in agile software development based on hierarchical analysis A Hybrid Collaborative Filtering Technique for Web Service Recommendation using Contextual Attributes of Web Services
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1