{"title":"报道前ISIS战士:《Kompas》和《Republika》在线报道中前ISIS遣返的框架分析","authors":"Lilik Hamidah, Mevy Eka Nurhalizah","doi":"10.15642/jki.2020.10.1.26-45","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper discusses how Kompas.com and Republika.co.id framed the coverage of the repatriation of ex-ISIS members to Indonesia. This study was a qualitative study using the approach of Robert N. Entman framing analysis model. The findings revealed that Kompas.com and Republika Online framed the return of the former ex-ISIS fighters to Indonesia differently in terms of the selection of news sources, legal analysis, and approval. Kompas.com tended to choose state officials to be a source to conduct analysis based on state law and reject repatriation of ex-ISIS. Meanwhile, Republika Online tended to select religious leaders to analyse based on Islamic law and allowed them to repatriate to this country. In other words, Kompas.com focused on the principle of humanism, while Republika Online more emphasised on Islam values and nationalism in their news coverage.","PeriodicalId":31785,"journal":{"name":"AtTabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam","volume":"14 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Covering Former ISIS Fighters: A Framing Analysis of the Repatriation of Ex-ISIS in the Online Coverage of Kompas and Republika\",\"authors\":\"Lilik Hamidah, Mevy Eka Nurhalizah\",\"doi\":\"10.15642/jki.2020.10.1.26-45\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper discusses how Kompas.com and Republika.co.id framed the coverage of the repatriation of ex-ISIS members to Indonesia. This study was a qualitative study using the approach of Robert N. Entman framing analysis model. The findings revealed that Kompas.com and Republika Online framed the return of the former ex-ISIS fighters to Indonesia differently in terms of the selection of news sources, legal analysis, and approval. Kompas.com tended to choose state officials to be a source to conduct analysis based on state law and reject repatriation of ex-ISIS. Meanwhile, Republika Online tended to select religious leaders to analyse based on Islamic law and allowed them to repatriate to this country. In other words, Kompas.com focused on the principle of humanism, while Republika Online more emphasised on Islam values and nationalism in their news coverage.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"AtTabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"AtTabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2020.10.1.26-45\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"AtTabsyir Jurnal Komunikasi Penyiaran Islam","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15642/jki.2020.10.1.26-45","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文讨论了Kompas.com和Republika.co.id如何对前isis成员遣返印度尼西亚的报道进行框架。本研究采用Robert N. Entman框架分析模型的方法进行定性研究。调查结果显示，Kompas.com和Republika Online在选择新闻来源、法律分析和批准方面，对前isis武装分子返回印度尼西亚的说法不同。Kompas.com倾向于选择州政府官员作为来源，根据州法律进行分析，并拒绝遣返前isis。同时，Republika Online倾向于根据伊斯兰法律选择宗教领袖进行分析，并允许他们遣返回国。换句话说，Kompas.com注重人文主义原则，而Republika Online则在新闻报道中更强调伊斯兰价值观和民族主义。
Covering Former ISIS Fighters: A Framing Analysis of the Repatriation of Ex-ISIS in the Online Coverage of Kompas and Republika
This paper discusses how Kompas.com and Republika.co.id framed the coverage of the repatriation of ex-ISIS members to Indonesia. This study was a qualitative study using the approach of Robert N. Entman framing analysis model. The findings revealed that Kompas.com and Republika Online framed the return of the former ex-ISIS fighters to Indonesia differently in terms of the selection of news sources, legal analysis, and approval. Kompas.com tended to choose state officials to be a source to conduct analysis based on state law and reject repatriation of ex-ISIS. Meanwhile, Republika Online tended to select religious leaders to analyse based on Islamic law and allowed them to repatriate to this country. In other words, Kompas.com focused on the principle of humanism, while Republika Online more emphasised on Islam values and nationalism in their news coverage.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
