[马德里卫生服务部门护士、助产士和非专业护士的焦虑(西班牙)]。

D. Ayuso-Murillo, Marina Jaime-Arranz, I. Herrera-Peco, J. Gómez‐Salgado, J. García-Iglesias, C. Ruiz-Frutos
{"title":"[马德里卫生服务部门护士、助产士和非专业护士的焦虑(西班牙)]。","authors":"D. Ayuso-Murillo, Marina Jaime-Arranz, I. Herrera-Peco, J. Gómez‐Salgado, J. García-Iglesias, C. Ruiz-Frutos","doi":"10.12961/aprl.2019.22.04.2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nWe analyzed state anxiety and trait anxiety in a population of nurses specialising in gynecology and obstetrics (nurse midwives) and a group of generalist nurses.\n\n\nMETHODS\nCross-sectional descriptive study using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaire (STAI), administered to a group of non-specialist nurses (n=96) and nurse midwives (n=63) who practice in the Madrid Health Service of Spain.\n\n\nRESULTS\nState anxiety was similar in generalist nurses and in midwives (5,01±1,62 and 5,17±1,75, respectively). Levels of trait anxiety were lower in nurse midwives (3,46±1,58) than in the non-specialist group (4,36±2,84), with the latter presenting higher levels of habitual anxiety as a personality trait (p=0,013).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nNurse midwives may adapt better to the stress derived from their work than generalist nurses. This could be attributed to the greater training and safety that specialties provide for the development of nursing care functions.","PeriodicalId":101300,"journal":{"name":"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales","volume":"28 1","pages":"165-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"[Anxiety in nurse midwives and non-specialist nurses in the Madrid health service (Spain)].\",\"authors\":\"D. Ayuso-Murillo, Marina Jaime-Arranz, I. Herrera-Peco, J. Gómez‐Salgado, J. García-Iglesias, C. Ruiz-Frutos\",\"doi\":\"10.12961/aprl.2019.22.04.2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nWe analyzed state anxiety and trait anxiety in a population of nurses specialising in gynecology and obstetrics (nurse midwives) and a group of generalist nurses.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nCross-sectional descriptive study using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaire (STAI), administered to a group of non-specialist nurses (n=96) and nurse midwives (n=63) who practice in the Madrid Health Service of Spain.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nState anxiety was similar in generalist nurses and in midwives (5,01±1,62 and 5,17±1,75, respectively). Levels of trait anxiety were lower in nurse midwives (3,46±1,58) than in the non-specialist group (4,36±2,84), with the latter presenting higher levels of habitual anxiety as a personality trait (p=0,013).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nNurse midwives may adapt better to the stress derived from their work than generalist nurses. This could be attributed to the greater training and safety that specialties provide for the development of nursing care functions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":101300,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"165-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2019.22.04.2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archivos de prevencion de riesgos laborales","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12961/aprl.2019.22.04.2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的分析一组妇产科专科护士(助产士护士)和一组全科护士的状态焦虑和特质焦虑。方法采用状态-特质焦虑问卷(STAI)进行横断面描述性研究,对一组在西班牙马德里卫生服务机构执业的非专科护士(n=96)和助产士(n=63)进行研究。结果全科护士和助产士的焦虑状态相似(分别为5.01±1.62和5.17±1.75)。助产士护士的特质焦虑水平(3,46±1,58)低于非专科组(4,36±2,84),后者表现出更高的习惯性焦虑水平(p=0,013)。结论助产士护士比全科护士更能适应工作压力。这可以归因于专业为护理功能的发展提供了更大的培训和安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[Anxiety in nurse midwives and non-specialist nurses in the Madrid health service (Spain)].
OBJECTIVE We analyzed state anxiety and trait anxiety in a population of nurses specialising in gynecology and obstetrics (nurse midwives) and a group of generalist nurses. METHODS Cross-sectional descriptive study using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory questionnaire (STAI), administered to a group of non-specialist nurses (n=96) and nurse midwives (n=63) who practice in the Madrid Health Service of Spain. RESULTS State anxiety was similar in generalist nurses and in midwives (5,01±1,62 and 5,17±1,75, respectively). Levels of trait anxiety were lower in nurse midwives (3,46±1,58) than in the non-specialist group (4,36±2,84), with the latter presenting higher levels of habitual anxiety as a personality trait (p=0,013). CONCLUSION Nurse midwives may adapt better to the stress derived from their work than generalist nurses. This could be attributed to the greater training and safety that specialties provide for the development of nursing care functions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
[Perceived work self-efficacy, and characteristics of return to work in women survivors of breast cancer at two reference centers in Colombia]. Integrated psychological intervention programme for frontline healthcare workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study. Ergonomics, musculoskeletal disorders, treatment and return to work: a conceptual framework for intervention programs. [Australia's engineered stone ban. A sound decision]. [Patient safety training for ward clerks of an Occupational Mutual Insurance Company collaborating with the Social Security, immediate impact and after six months].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1