全部干涸:南非拉迪史密斯干旱的实质

IF 3 2区 社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Environment and Planning. E, Nature and Space Pub Date : 2022-09-22 DOI:10.1177/25148486221126617
Elisabetta Savelli, Maria Rusca, H. Cloke, T. Flügel, Abdulrazak Karriem, G. di Baldassarre
{"title":"全部干涸:南非拉迪史密斯干旱的实质","authors":"Elisabetta Savelli, Maria Rusca, H. Cloke, T. Flügel, Abdulrazak Karriem, G. di Baldassarre","doi":"10.1177/25148486221126617","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper conceptualises droughts as socioecological phenomena coproduced by the recursive engagement of human and non-human transformations. Through an interdisciplinary approach that integrates political ecology, material geographies and hydroclimatology, this work simultaneously apprehends the role of politics and power in reshaping drought, along with the agency of biophysical processes – soil, vegetation, hydrology and microclimate – that co-produce droughts and their spatiotemporal patterning. The drought-stricken Ladismith in Western Cape, South Africa, is the instrumental case study and point of departure of our empirical analysis. To advance a materiality of drought that seriously accounts for the coevolution of biophysical and political transformations, we alter the spatiotemporal and empirical foci of drought analyses thereby retracing Ladismith’s socioecological history since colonial times. In turn, such extended framework exposes the agency of soil, vegetation, hydrology and microclimate and their metabolic exchanges with processes of colonisation, apartheid, capitalist and neoliberal transformations of South African economy. We argue that the narrow pursuit of profits and capital accumulation of the few has produced a fundamental disruption between nature and society which contributed to transform Ladismith’s drought into a socioecological crisis. Whilst advancing debates on materiality, we note two fundamental contributions to the study of drought. First, our approach makes hydrological accounts of droughts less politically naive and socially blind. Second, it develops a political ecology of droughts and socioecological crises more attuned to the materiality of drought. We contend that apprehending the materiality of drought and the active role of its non-human processes can further understandings of the workings of power and the production of socioecological injustices.","PeriodicalId":11723,"journal":{"name":"Environment and Planning. E, Nature and Space","volume":"33 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"All dried up: The materiality of drought in Ladismith, South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Elisabetta Savelli, Maria Rusca, H. Cloke, T. Flügel, Abdulrazak Karriem, G. di Baldassarre\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25148486221126617\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper conceptualises droughts as socioecological phenomena coproduced by the recursive engagement of human and non-human transformations. Through an interdisciplinary approach that integrates political ecology, material geographies and hydroclimatology, this work simultaneously apprehends the role of politics and power in reshaping drought, along with the agency of biophysical processes – soil, vegetation, hydrology and microclimate – that co-produce droughts and their spatiotemporal patterning. The drought-stricken Ladismith in Western Cape, South Africa, is the instrumental case study and point of departure of our empirical analysis. To advance a materiality of drought that seriously accounts for the coevolution of biophysical and political transformations, we alter the spatiotemporal and empirical foci of drought analyses thereby retracing Ladismith’s socioecological history since colonial times. In turn, such extended framework exposes the agency of soil, vegetation, hydrology and microclimate and their metabolic exchanges with processes of colonisation, apartheid, capitalist and neoliberal transformations of South African economy. We argue that the narrow pursuit of profits and capital accumulation of the few has produced a fundamental disruption between nature and society which contributed to transform Ladismith’s drought into a socioecological crisis. Whilst advancing debates on materiality, we note two fundamental contributions to the study of drought. First, our approach makes hydrological accounts of droughts less politically naive and socially blind. Second, it develops a political ecology of droughts and socioecological crises more attuned to the materiality of drought. We contend that apprehending the materiality of drought and the active role of its non-human processes can further understandings of the workings of power and the production of socioecological injustices.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11723,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environment and Planning. E, Nature and Space\",\"volume\":\"33 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environment and Planning. E, Nature and Space\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221126617\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environment and Planning. E, Nature and Space","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221126617","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文将干旱概念化为人类和非人类转化递归参与共同产生的社会生态现象。通过整合政治生态学、物质地理学和水文气候学的跨学科方法,这项工作同时理解了政治和权力在重塑干旱中的作用,以及生物物理过程(土壤、植被、水文和小气候)的作用,这些过程共同产生干旱及其时空模式。南非西开普省遭受旱灾的拉迪史密斯是我们实证分析的工具性案例研究和出发点。为了推进干旱的物质性,从而严肃地解释生物物理和政治转变的共同进化,我们改变了干旱分析的时空和经验焦点,从而追溯了拉迪斯史密斯自殖民时代以来的社会生态历史。反过来,这种扩展的框架暴露了土壤、植被、水文和小气候的作用,以及它们与殖民、种族隔离、资本主义和南非经济新自由主义转型过程的代谢交换。我们认为,少数人对利润和资本积累的狭隘追求已经在自然与社会之间产生了根本性的破坏,这有助于将拉迪史密斯的干旱转变为社会生态危机。在推进关于重要性的辩论的同时,我们注意到对干旱研究的两个基本贡献。首先,我们的方法使干旱的水文描述在政治上不那么幼稚和社会上不那么盲目。其次,它发展了干旱和社会生态危机的政治生态,更适应干旱的物质性。我们认为,理解干旱的物质性及其非人类过程的积极作用可以进一步理解权力的运作和社会生态不公正的产生。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
All dried up: The materiality of drought in Ladismith, South Africa
This paper conceptualises droughts as socioecological phenomena coproduced by the recursive engagement of human and non-human transformations. Through an interdisciplinary approach that integrates political ecology, material geographies and hydroclimatology, this work simultaneously apprehends the role of politics and power in reshaping drought, along with the agency of biophysical processes – soil, vegetation, hydrology and microclimate – that co-produce droughts and their spatiotemporal patterning. The drought-stricken Ladismith in Western Cape, South Africa, is the instrumental case study and point of departure of our empirical analysis. To advance a materiality of drought that seriously accounts for the coevolution of biophysical and political transformations, we alter the spatiotemporal and empirical foci of drought analyses thereby retracing Ladismith’s socioecological history since colonial times. In turn, such extended framework exposes the agency of soil, vegetation, hydrology and microclimate and their metabolic exchanges with processes of colonisation, apartheid, capitalist and neoliberal transformations of South African economy. We argue that the narrow pursuit of profits and capital accumulation of the few has produced a fundamental disruption between nature and society which contributed to transform Ladismith’s drought into a socioecological crisis. Whilst advancing debates on materiality, we note two fundamental contributions to the study of drought. First, our approach makes hydrological accounts of droughts less politically naive and socially blind. Second, it develops a political ecology of droughts and socioecological crises more attuned to the materiality of drought. We contend that apprehending the materiality of drought and the active role of its non-human processes can further understandings of the workings of power and the production of socioecological injustices.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.00
自引率
13.80%
发文量
101
期刊最新文献
Expertise, trading zones and the planning system: A case study of an energy-from-biomass plant Grass versus trees: A proxy debate for deeper anxieties about competing stream worlds Everyday youth climate politics and performances of climate citizenship in Aotearoa New Zealand Political ecologies of a university and land at Cairo's urban periphery: The American University in Cairo's suburban desert campus ‘My body tells me to stay here’: Materiality, identity and everyday politics in Wentang Town, China
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1