实证经济学与规范经济学之间的联系

IF 0.7 4区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE Pub Date : 2018-01-01 DOI:10.3917/REDP.282.0191
D. Hausman
{"title":"实证经济学与规范经济学之间的联系","authors":"D. Hausman","doi":"10.3917/REDP.282.0191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This essay clarifies the relations between positive economics and mainstream normative economics. If rationality can be characterized by conditions on preferences and choices and, in addition, people are, to a reasonable degree of approximation rational, then economists can invoke the theory of rationality to explain choices. If people are also, as in positive economics, largely self-interested and reasonably well-informed, then their preferences will also indicate their level of well-being. Modeling both choice and welfare in terms of rational preferences thus unites positive and normative economics. In explaining market outcomes in terms of individual choices, explaining choices by preferences, and taking preferences to indicate well-being, economists who are concerned with welfare defend a normative theory that piggybacks on their positive theory. This traditional mainstream normative theory is problematic, but because of its unity and its connection to positive economics, it is also very powerful.","PeriodicalId":44798,"journal":{"name":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","volume":"11 1","pages":"191-208"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Bond between Positive and Normative Economics\",\"authors\":\"D. Hausman\",\"doi\":\"10.3917/REDP.282.0191\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This essay clarifies the relations between positive economics and mainstream normative economics. If rationality can be characterized by conditions on preferences and choices and, in addition, people are, to a reasonable degree of approximation rational, then economists can invoke the theory of rationality to explain choices. If people are also, as in positive economics, largely self-interested and reasonably well-informed, then their preferences will also indicate their level of well-being. Modeling both choice and welfare in terms of rational preferences thus unites positive and normative economics. In explaining market outcomes in terms of individual choices, explaining choices by preferences, and taking preferences to indicate well-being, economists who are concerned with welfare defend a normative theory that piggybacks on their positive theory. This traditional mainstream normative theory is problematic, but because of its unity and its connection to positive economics, it is also very powerful.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44798,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"191-208\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3917/REDP.282.0191\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVUE D ECONOMIE POLITIQUE","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3917/REDP.282.0191","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

本文阐明了实证经济学与主流规范经济学的关系。如果理性可以用偏好和选择的条件来描述,另外,人们在合理的近似程度上是理性的,那么经济学家就可以援引理性理论来解释选择。如果人们也像积极经济学中那样,在很大程度上是自利的,而且消息灵通,那么他们的偏好也将表明他们的幸福水平。因此,根据理性偏好对选择和福利进行建模将实证经济学和规范经济学结合起来。在用个人选择来解释市场结果,用偏好来解释选择,用偏好来表示幸福时,关注福利的经济学家捍卫了一种基于他们的实证理论的规范理论。这种传统的主流规范理论是有问题的,但由于它的统一性和与实证经济学的联系,它也非常强大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Bond between Positive and Normative Economics
This essay clarifies the relations between positive economics and mainstream normative economics. If rationality can be characterized by conditions on preferences and choices and, in addition, people are, to a reasonable degree of approximation rational, then economists can invoke the theory of rationality to explain choices. If people are also, as in positive economics, largely self-interested and reasonably well-informed, then their preferences will also indicate their level of well-being. Modeling both choice and welfare in terms of rational preferences thus unites positive and normative economics. In explaining market outcomes in terms of individual choices, explaining choices by preferences, and taking preferences to indicate well-being, economists who are concerned with welfare defend a normative theory that piggybacks on their positive theory. This traditional mainstream normative theory is problematic, but because of its unity and its connection to positive economics, it is also very powerful.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊最新文献
Monetary Policy with Weakened Unions American Protectionism On the Historical Foundation of Women’s Self-Employment in Africa Testing for the Imports-Led Growth and the Growth-Led Imports Hypotheses in Panels for the Small Island World Mehrdad Vahabi, Destructive Coordination, Anfal and Islamic Political Capitalism. New Reading of Contemporary Iran , Palgrave-Macmillan, 2023
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1