荷兰的新冠肺炎专项措施——是否符合总体情况?

N. Gundt
{"title":"荷兰的新冠肺炎专项措施——是否符合总体情况?","authors":"N. Gundt","doi":"10.31261/ZPPPIPS.2021.19.07","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses the nature of the Dutch COVID relief measures for employers concerning wage costs. The question is raised whether the ad-hoc decrees fit into the general picture of Dutch labour law and respects the two key principles (1) safeguarding employees’ income and (2) requesting employee flexibility with regard to the work in case the exact job does not exist any more or is under serious threat. The contribution finds that the emergency legislation does respect these two main principles, while judges refuse substantial modifications of wages and / or working hours on the basis of reasonableness, also upholding the key principles of employee protection.","PeriodicalId":52556,"journal":{"name":"Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Spolecznej","volume":"29 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The COVID-specific Measures in the Netherlands – Do They Fit into the General Picture?\",\"authors\":\"N. Gundt\",\"doi\":\"10.31261/ZPPPIPS.2021.19.07\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses the nature of the Dutch COVID relief measures for employers concerning wage costs. The question is raised whether the ad-hoc decrees fit into the general picture of Dutch labour law and respects the two key principles (1) safeguarding employees’ income and (2) requesting employee flexibility with regard to the work in case the exact job does not exist any more or is under serious threat. The contribution finds that the emergency legislation does respect these two main principles, while judges refuse substantial modifications of wages and / or working hours on the basis of reasonableness, also upholding the key principles of employee protection.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52556,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Spolecznej\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Spolecznej\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31261/ZPPPIPS.2021.19.07\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia z Zakresu Prawa Pracy i Polityki Spolecznej","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31261/ZPPPIPS.2021.19.07","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文讨论了荷兰针对雇主的工资成本救助措施的性质。有人提出的问题是,这些临时法令是否符合荷兰劳动法的总体情况,并尊重两个关键原则(1)保障雇员的收入和(2)在确切的工作不再存在或受到严重威胁的情况下要求雇员在工作方面具有灵活性。提交的材料认为,紧急立法确实尊重这两项主要原则,而法官拒绝在合理的基础上大幅度修改工资和(或)工作时间,同时也坚持保护雇员的关键原则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The COVID-specific Measures in the Netherlands – Do They Fit into the General Picture?
This article discusses the nature of the Dutch COVID relief measures for employers concerning wage costs. The question is raised whether the ad-hoc decrees fit into the general picture of Dutch labour law and respects the two key principles (1) safeguarding employees’ income and (2) requesting employee flexibility with regard to the work in case the exact job does not exist any more or is under serious threat. The contribution finds that the emergency legislation does respect these two main principles, while judges refuse substantial modifications of wages and / or working hours on the basis of reasonableness, also upholding the key principles of employee protection.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
40 weeks
期刊最新文献
Possible remedies to prevent the misuse of diplomatic immunity ILO Convention No. 190 concerning the Elimination of Violence and Harassment in the World of Work and Recommendation No. 206 On the border of the physical and the virtual workplace – Dogmatic issues of home office and telework in general and in Hungarian law O lęku przed nadciągającym chipowaniem pracowników – uwagi na tle powstającego ustawodawstwa w USA Platform work as a manifestation of a new form of employment in the era of the fourth industrial revolution
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1