颌面部手术中硬体移除率的评估

Bharati R. Doni, G Shushma
{"title":"颌面部手术中硬体移除率的评估","authors":"Bharati R. Doni, G Shushma","doi":"10.18231/j.jooo.2020.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infected hardware is populated with bacterial colonies. The present study was conducted to\ndetermine hardware removal rate in maxillofacial surgery.\nMaterials and Methods: This study was conducted on 580 patients of both genders treated by open\nreduction and internal fixation. Type of bone in which hardware was used and reason for hardware removal\nwas assessed.\nResults: Out of 580 patients, males were 320 and females were 260. Hardware removal rate was in 11\nout of 132 cases of maxilla, 24 out of 218 cases of mandible, 16 out of 125 cases of zygomatic, 10 out of\n75 cases of nasal bone and 2 out of 30 cases of orbit. The difference was significant (P \ncommon cause of removal of hardware was infection in 20 cases, wound in 12, malunion in 11, pain and\nresorption in 6 each, non union in 5 and refracture in 2 cases. The difference was significant (P \nTable III shows that out of 410 titanium implants, 42 had failure and out of 170 stainless steel implants, 21\nshowed failures.\nConclusion: Authors found that most common cause of removal of hardware was infection, wound,\nmalunion, pain, resorption, non union and refracture.\n\nKeywords: Pain, Resorption, Non union.","PeriodicalId":16606,"journal":{"name":"Journal of oral medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessment of hardware removal rate in maxillofacial surgery\",\"authors\":\"Bharati R. Doni, G Shushma\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.jooo.2020.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Infected hardware is populated with bacterial colonies. The present study was conducted to\\ndetermine hardware removal rate in maxillofacial surgery.\\nMaterials and Methods: This study was conducted on 580 patients of both genders treated by open\\nreduction and internal fixation. Type of bone in which hardware was used and reason for hardware removal\\nwas assessed.\\nResults: Out of 580 patients, males were 320 and females were 260. Hardware removal rate was in 11\\nout of 132 cases of maxilla, 24 out of 218 cases of mandible, 16 out of 125 cases of zygomatic, 10 out of\\n75 cases of nasal bone and 2 out of 30 cases of orbit. The difference was significant (P \\ncommon cause of removal of hardware was infection in 20 cases, wound in 12, malunion in 11, pain and\\nresorption in 6 each, non union in 5 and refracture in 2 cases. The difference was significant (P \\nTable III shows that out of 410 titanium implants, 42 had failure and out of 170 stainless steel implants, 21\\nshowed failures.\\nConclusion: Authors found that most common cause of removal of hardware was infection, wound,\\nmalunion, pain, resorption, non union and refracture.\\n\\nKeywords: Pain, Resorption, Non union.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16606,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of oral medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of oral medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jooo.2020.015\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of oral medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.jooo.2020.015","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:受感染的硬件充满了细菌菌落。本研究旨在确定颌面外科手术中硬体的移除率。材料与方法:本研究对580例男女患者进行切开复位内固定治疗。评估使用内固定物的骨类型和移除内固定物的原因。结果:580例患者中,男性320例,女性260例。上颌132例中有11例,下颌骨218例中有24例,颧骨125例中有16例,鼻骨75例中有10例,眶部30例中有2例。常见原因为感染20例,伤口12例,骨不愈合11例,疼痛及骨吸收6例,骨不愈合5例,再骨折2例。表III显示,在410个钛种植体中,42个失败,在170个不锈钢种植体中,21个失败。结论:感染、伤口、骨不愈合、疼痛、骨吸收、骨不愈合和再骨折是导致骨内固定取出最常见的原因。关键词:疼痛,吸收,骨不连。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Assessment of hardware removal rate in maxillofacial surgery
Background: Infected hardware is populated with bacterial colonies. The present study was conducted to determine hardware removal rate in maxillofacial surgery. Materials and Methods: This study was conducted on 580 patients of both genders treated by open reduction and internal fixation. Type of bone in which hardware was used and reason for hardware removal was assessed. Results: Out of 580 patients, males were 320 and females were 260. Hardware removal rate was in 11 out of 132 cases of maxilla, 24 out of 218 cases of mandible, 16 out of 125 cases of zygomatic, 10 out of 75 cases of nasal bone and 2 out of 30 cases of orbit. The difference was significant (P common cause of removal of hardware was infection in 20 cases, wound in 12, malunion in 11, pain and resorption in 6 each, non union in 5 and refracture in 2 cases. The difference was significant (P Table III shows that out of 410 titanium implants, 42 had failure and out of 170 stainless steel implants, 21 showed failures. Conclusion: Authors found that most common cause of removal of hardware was infection, wound, malunion, pain, resorption, non union and refracture. Keywords: Pain, Resorption, Non union.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Relationship Between Symptoms of Oral Mucosal Diseases and Psychological Status Recovery from Acute Malocclusion in Temporomandibular Disorders with Stabilization Splint: Case Report An eight-year-old boy with large complex odontoma inmaxillary anterior area associated with unerupted tooth Comparitive assessment of bite forces in subjects treated for anterior mandibular fractures with 3-dimensional plates and standard miniplates A brief review on classification of oral ulcerative lesions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1