关于保证、否决和随意的独裁者

IF 1.2 3区 经济学 Q3 ECONOMICS Theoretical Economics Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.3982/te4832
Anna Bogomolnaia, R. Holzman, H. Moulin
{"title":"关于保证、否决和随意的独裁者","authors":"Anna Bogomolnaia, R. Holzman, H. Moulin","doi":"10.3982/te4832","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A mechanism guarantees a certain welfare level to its agents, if each of them can secure that level against unanimously adversarial others. How high can such a guarantee be, and what type of mechanism achieves it? In the n‐person probabilistic voting/bargaining model with p deterministic outcomes a guarantee takes the form of a probability distribution over the ranks from 1 to p. If n ≥  p, the uniform lottery is shown to be the only maximal (unimprovable) guarantee. If n <  p, combining (variants of) the familiar random dictator and voting by veto mechanisms yields a large family of maximal guarantees: it is exhaustive if n = 2 and almost so if p ≤ 2 n. Voting rules à la Condorcet or Borda, even in probabilistic form, are ruled out by our worst case viewpoint.","PeriodicalId":46923,"journal":{"name":"Theoretical Economics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"On guarantees, vetoes, and random dictators\",\"authors\":\"Anna Bogomolnaia, R. Holzman, H. Moulin\",\"doi\":\"10.3982/te4832\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A mechanism guarantees a certain welfare level to its agents, if each of them can secure that level against unanimously adversarial others. How high can such a guarantee be, and what type of mechanism achieves it? In the n‐person probabilistic voting/bargaining model with p deterministic outcomes a guarantee takes the form of a probability distribution over the ranks from 1 to p. If n ≥  p, the uniform lottery is shown to be the only maximal (unimprovable) guarantee. If n <  p, combining (variants of) the familiar random dictator and voting by veto mechanisms yields a large family of maximal guarantees: it is exhaustive if n = 2 and almost so if p ≤ 2 n. Voting rules à la Condorcet or Borda, even in probabilistic form, are ruled out by our worst case viewpoint.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46923,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Theoretical Economics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Theoretical Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3982/te4832\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Theoretical Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3982/te4832","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一种机制保证了它的代理人享有一定的福利水平,前提是他们中的每一个人都能在对抗其他一致敌对的人时获得这一福利水平。这样的保证能有多高,什么样的机制能实现?在具有p个确定性结果的n人概率投票/议价模型中,保证采用从1到p的概率分布形式。如果n≥p,则均匀彩票被证明是唯一的最大(不可改进)保证。如果n < p,将熟悉的随机独裁者的(变体)与否决机制的投票相结合,就会产生大量的最大保证:如果n = 2,它是详尽的,如果p≤2n,它几乎是详尽的。投票规则如la Condorcet或Borda,即使是概率形式,也被我们的最坏情况观点所排除。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
On guarantees, vetoes, and random dictators
A mechanism guarantees a certain welfare level to its agents, if each of them can secure that level against unanimously adversarial others. How high can such a guarantee be, and what type of mechanism achieves it? In the n‐person probabilistic voting/bargaining model with p deterministic outcomes a guarantee takes the form of a probability distribution over the ranks from 1 to p. If n ≥  p, the uniform lottery is shown to be the only maximal (unimprovable) guarantee. If n <  p, combining (variants of) the familiar random dictator and voting by veto mechanisms yields a large family of maximal guarantees: it is exhaustive if n = 2 and almost so if p ≤ 2 n. Voting rules à la Condorcet or Borda, even in probabilistic form, are ruled out by our worst case viewpoint.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
35
审稿时长
52 weeks
期刊介绍: Theoretical Economics publishes leading research in economic theory. It is published by the Econometric Society three times a year, in January, May, and September. All content is freely available. It is included in the Social Sciences Citation Index
期刊最新文献
NOT BY MAX WEBER ALONE: HISTORICAL TYPES OF STATE BUREAUCRACY (THE ADVANTAGES AND SHORTCOMINGS) STUDENT YOUTH’ SOCIAL ACTIVITY MASS PRACTICES On rank dominance of tie‐breaking rules UNDERSTANDING ECONOMIC SECURITY IN RUSSIA: OFFICIAL DOCTRINE AND ALTERNATIVE APPROACHES Loss aversion in sequential auctions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1