在(联合国)维持多民族国家统一中的代理人作用:以科索沃分离为例

Mirsad Kriještorac
{"title":"在(联合国)维持多民族国家统一中的代理人作用:以科索沃分离为例","authors":"Mirsad Kriještorac","doi":"10.21599/ATJIR.59577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper proposes an explanation for the Kosovo secession from Serbia/Yugoslavia. This is achieved by disaggregating the ‘reality’ of the state through the process tracing method, which compares the cases of the Tito and Milosevic triangles of accommodation practices. The focus is on the games of survival practiced at the middle levels of political life, around the local state policy implementer and the consequences of his removal. This paper examines not only why, but how the secession of Kosovo occurred when it did. It shows that the strength of authoritarianism or the regime-oppression capability is not what held the Serbia and Kosovo together; rather, it was the policies of accommodations which one leader did better than the other","PeriodicalId":7411,"journal":{"name":"Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations","volume":"4 1","pages":"1-15"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Role of an Agent in (un)Keeping the Multiethnic State Together: The Case of the Secession of Kosovo\",\"authors\":\"Mirsad Kriještorac\",\"doi\":\"10.21599/ATJIR.59577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper proposes an explanation for the Kosovo secession from Serbia/Yugoslavia. This is achieved by disaggregating the ‘reality’ of the state through the process tracing method, which compares the cases of the Tito and Milosevic triangles of accommodation practices. The focus is on the games of survival practiced at the middle levels of political life, around the local state policy implementer and the consequences of his removal. This paper examines not only why, but how the secession of Kosovo occurred when it did. It shows that the strength of authoritarianism or the regime-oppression capability is not what held the Serbia and Kosovo together; rather, it was the policies of accommodations which one leader did better than the other\",\"PeriodicalId\":7411,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"1-15\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21599/ATJIR.59577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alternatives: Turkish Journal of International Relations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21599/ATJIR.59577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本文对科索沃脱离塞尔维亚/南斯拉夫提出了一种解释。这是通过过程追踪方法分解国家的“现实”来实现的,该方法比较了铁托和米洛舍维奇三角形住宿实践的案例。本书的重点是围绕着地方国家政策执行者和他被免职的后果,在政治生活的中层进行的生存游戏。本文不仅考察了科索沃为什么会分裂,还考察了它是如何分裂的。这表明,威权主义的力量或政权压迫能力并不是将塞尔维亚和科索沃团结在一起的原因;相反,这是一位领导人比另一位领导人做得更好的住宿政策
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Role of an Agent in (un)Keeping the Multiethnic State Together: The Case of the Secession of Kosovo
This paper proposes an explanation for the Kosovo secession from Serbia/Yugoslavia. This is achieved by disaggregating the ‘reality’ of the state through the process tracing method, which compares the cases of the Tito and Milosevic triangles of accommodation practices. The focus is on the games of survival practiced at the middle levels of political life, around the local state policy implementer and the consequences of his removal. This paper examines not only why, but how the secession of Kosovo occurred when it did. It shows that the strength of authoritarianism or the regime-oppression capability is not what held the Serbia and Kosovo together; rather, it was the policies of accommodations which one leader did better than the other
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The ILO’s Safety and Health in Mines Convention: Reframing the Scope of Obligations for a Sustainable World The EU-Turkey refugee deal of autumn 2015 as a two-level game Trading Places: How Turkey Can Join the Rich, Using Trade Policy U.S.-Turkey Relationship and Syrian Crisis Samtskhe-Javakheti Region: A Neglected Keypoint for European Security of Energy Supply?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1