人权与全球化-人权是“西方”概念还是普世原则?

W. Huber
{"title":"人权与全球化-人权是“西方”概念还是普世原则?","authors":"W. Huber","doi":"10.5952/55-1-2-518","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper represents an edited version of the authors’ STIAS\n lecture at the Stellenbosch University in 2014. It deals with the global human\n rights discourse, as the integrity of human persons all around the world is at\n stake, showing the necessity and the universality of human rights. Therefore the\n author explores two basic kinds of attitudes towards human rights, namely 1) forms\n of human rights optimism – e.g. the argument that globalisation as such leads to a\n universal acknowledgement of them – and 2) variants of human rights scepticism, in\n which the author sees those rights practically disregarded, the “Western” concept\n challenged, and a human rights exceptionalism spreading. Subsequently he asks for\n what kind of universality of human rights we may argue and how cosmopolitan ethics\n may support this universality.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human rights and globalisation – Are human rights a “Western” concept or a universalistic principle?\",\"authors\":\"W. Huber\",\"doi\":\"10.5952/55-1-2-518\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper represents an edited version of the authors’ STIAS\\n lecture at the Stellenbosch University in 2014. It deals with the global human\\n rights discourse, as the integrity of human persons all around the world is at\\n stake, showing the necessity and the universality of human rights. Therefore the\\n author explores two basic kinds of attitudes towards human rights, namely 1) forms\\n of human rights optimism – e.g. the argument that globalisation as such leads to a\\n universal acknowledgement of them – and 2) variants of human rights scepticism, in\\n which the author sees those rights practically disregarded, the “Western” concept\\n challenged, and a human rights exceptionalism spreading. Subsequently he asks for\\n what kind of universality of human rights we may argue and how cosmopolitan ethics\\n may support this universality.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-09-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5952/55-1-2-518\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/55-1-2-518","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

本文是作者2014年在Stellenbosch大学STIAS讲座的编辑版。它涉及全球人权话语,因为世界各地的人的完整受到威胁,显示了人权的必要性和普遍性。因此,作者探讨了对人权的两种基本态度,即1)人权乐观主义的形式-例如,全球化导致普遍承认人权的论点-和2)人权怀疑主义的变体,其中作者认为这些权利实际上被忽视,“西方”概念受到挑战,人权例外论正在蔓延。随后,他提出了我们可以论证的人权的普遍性,以及世界主义伦理如何支持这种普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Human rights and globalisation – Are human rights a “Western” concept or a universalistic principle?
This paper represents an edited version of the authors’ STIAS lecture at the Stellenbosch University in 2014. It deals with the global human rights discourse, as the integrity of human persons all around the world is at stake, showing the necessity and the universality of human rights. Therefore the author explores two basic kinds of attitudes towards human rights, namely 1) forms of human rights optimism – e.g. the argument that globalisation as such leads to a universal acknowledgement of them – and 2) variants of human rights scepticism, in which the author sees those rights practically disregarded, the “Western” concept challenged, and a human rights exceptionalism spreading. Subsequently he asks for what kind of universality of human rights we may argue and how cosmopolitan ethics may support this universality.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Power games: Using Foucault to shed light on the inherent power dynamics of intercultural Bible study groups. Discussion of a qualitative research project The rising prominence of John Owen: A research article of “The Ashgate Research Companion to John Owen’s Theology” Alle kaarte op die preek “Rise up and walk” : tracing the trajectory of the Carnegie discourse and plotting a way forward The relevance of Galatians 5:16-26 in the modern "spiritual intelligence" debate
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1