建筑物地震易损性评估与改造策略:简化易损性评估

YMER Digital Pub Date : 2022-07-31 DOI:10.37896/ymer21.07/b2
Prabhu Agrawal, S. Jaiswal, Nishat Yadav
{"title":"建筑物地震易损性评估与改造策略:简化易损性评估","authors":"Prabhu Agrawal, S. Jaiswal, Nishat Yadav","doi":"10.37896/ymer21.07/b2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In India, 85% of existing buildings are unreinforced masonry and 5-7% are reinforced concrete and 5-7% are traditional buildings. And most buildings do not qualify to resist earthquakes, technically it can be said that they would not be able to resist earthquake loads. In the past, it is seen at the time of the earthquake, millions of lives and the economy of that region is affected. Demolition of ageing building mass is not only harmful to the environment but also it is not viable economically to rebuild all vulnerable buildings. Such buildings are recommended to be retrofitted. Recent earthquakes have demonstrated the need to identify and improve the performance of the existing seismic deficient buildings. For this reason, Seismic vulnerability assessment is considered a part of a better strategy to mitigate the risk and improve the resiliency of the country and its infrastructure. Due to the high volume of building archetypes in our country, for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment at a huge scale, a rapid, simplified method is being adopted that can facilitate the assessment procedure in a lesser computational time period. This paper was primarily engrossed in the analysis of some simplified methods proposed in the literature for assessing the simplified seismic vulnerability. A hypothetical building is analyzed using structural software (Etabs) by Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Procedure. Using Etabs software, various structural parameters like Story Response Drift, Displacement (max) and Base Shear are considered and discussed. By proper interpretation of the result, a suitable measure to minimize vulnerability and ensure sustainability and cost-effectiveness, retrofitting strategies is recommended. Keywords: Seismic vulnerability, Existing Building, Simplified Analytical Method, Rapid Visual Screening, Detailed vulnerability assessment, Etabs, Non-linear Dynamic Analysis, Retrofitting Strategies","PeriodicalId":23848,"journal":{"name":"YMER Digital","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Building For Retrofitting Strategies: Simplified Vulnerability Assessment\",\"authors\":\"Prabhu Agrawal, S. Jaiswal, Nishat Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.37896/ymer21.07/b2\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In India, 85% of existing buildings are unreinforced masonry and 5-7% are reinforced concrete and 5-7% are traditional buildings. And most buildings do not qualify to resist earthquakes, technically it can be said that they would not be able to resist earthquake loads. In the past, it is seen at the time of the earthquake, millions of lives and the economy of that region is affected. Demolition of ageing building mass is not only harmful to the environment but also it is not viable economically to rebuild all vulnerable buildings. Such buildings are recommended to be retrofitted. Recent earthquakes have demonstrated the need to identify and improve the performance of the existing seismic deficient buildings. For this reason, Seismic vulnerability assessment is considered a part of a better strategy to mitigate the risk and improve the resiliency of the country and its infrastructure. Due to the high volume of building archetypes in our country, for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment at a huge scale, a rapid, simplified method is being adopted that can facilitate the assessment procedure in a lesser computational time period. This paper was primarily engrossed in the analysis of some simplified methods proposed in the literature for assessing the simplified seismic vulnerability. A hypothetical building is analyzed using structural software (Etabs) by Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Procedure. Using Etabs software, various structural parameters like Story Response Drift, Displacement (max) and Base Shear are considered and discussed. By proper interpretation of the result, a suitable measure to minimize vulnerability and ensure sustainability and cost-effectiveness, retrofitting strategies is recommended. Keywords: Seismic vulnerability, Existing Building, Simplified Analytical Method, Rapid Visual Screening, Detailed vulnerability assessment, Etabs, Non-linear Dynamic Analysis, Retrofitting Strategies\",\"PeriodicalId\":23848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"YMER Digital\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"YMER Digital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37896/ymer21.07/b2\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"YMER Digital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37896/ymer21.07/b2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在印度,85%的现有建筑是未经加固的砖石,5-7%是钢筋混凝土,5-7%是传统建筑。而且大多数建筑物都不具备抗震能力,从技术上讲,可以说它们无法抵抗地震荷载。在过去,人们看到在地震发生的时候,数百万人的生命和该地区的经济受到影响。拆除老化的建筑物不仅对环境有害,而且重建所有脆弱的建筑物在经济上也不可行。建议对这些建筑物进行改造。最近的地震表明,有必要识别和改善现有的抗震缺陷建筑的性能。因此,地震脆弱性评估被认为是降低风险和提高国家及其基础设施弹性的更好战略的一部分。由于我国建筑原型量大,对于大规模的地震易损性评估,人们正在采用一种快速、简化的方法,使评估过程在更短的计算时间内完成。本文主要分析了文献中提出的几种简化地震易损性评价方法。利用结构软件(Etabs)的非线性动力分析程序对一个假设的建筑物进行了分析。利用Etabs软件,对层间响应位移、最大位移和基底剪力等结构参数进行了考虑和讨论。通过对结果的适当解释,建议采取适当措施,尽量减少脆弱性,确保可持续性和成本效益,改造战略。关键词:地震易损性,既有建筑,简化分析法,快速视觉筛选,详细易损性评估,Etabs,非线性动力分析,改造策略
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Seismic Vulnerability Assessment of Building For Retrofitting Strategies: Simplified Vulnerability Assessment
In India, 85% of existing buildings are unreinforced masonry and 5-7% are reinforced concrete and 5-7% are traditional buildings. And most buildings do not qualify to resist earthquakes, technically it can be said that they would not be able to resist earthquake loads. In the past, it is seen at the time of the earthquake, millions of lives and the economy of that region is affected. Demolition of ageing building mass is not only harmful to the environment but also it is not viable economically to rebuild all vulnerable buildings. Such buildings are recommended to be retrofitted. Recent earthquakes have demonstrated the need to identify and improve the performance of the existing seismic deficient buildings. For this reason, Seismic vulnerability assessment is considered a part of a better strategy to mitigate the risk and improve the resiliency of the country and its infrastructure. Due to the high volume of building archetypes in our country, for Seismic Vulnerability Assessment at a huge scale, a rapid, simplified method is being adopted that can facilitate the assessment procedure in a lesser computational time period. This paper was primarily engrossed in the analysis of some simplified methods proposed in the literature for assessing the simplified seismic vulnerability. A hypothetical building is analyzed using structural software (Etabs) by Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis Procedure. Using Etabs software, various structural parameters like Story Response Drift, Displacement (max) and Base Shear are considered and discussed. By proper interpretation of the result, a suitable measure to minimize vulnerability and ensure sustainability and cost-effectiveness, retrofitting strategies is recommended. Keywords: Seismic vulnerability, Existing Building, Simplified Analytical Method, Rapid Visual Screening, Detailed vulnerability assessment, Etabs, Non-linear Dynamic Analysis, Retrofitting Strategies
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
PHYTOCHEMICAL INVESTIGATION OF METHANOLIC EXTRACT OF COCCINIA INDICA LEAVES COMPARATIVE IN-VITRO ANTIOXIDANT POTENTIAL OF SOME HERBAL PLANTS Algorithm for Enhanced Columnar Transposition Technique AN OBSERVATION OF PREFERENCES ON BILINGUAL EDUCATION AMONG THE LEARNERS OF ENGLISH AS A SECOND LANGUAGE Review on various combination therapies for the treatment of Hypertrophic scars and keloids
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1