{"title":"医疗事故","authors":"H. Beresford","doi":"10.1201/9781003066736-90","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in design, in fl atable penile prostheses (IPPs) remain susceptible to mechanical degradation with repeated use. We sought to characterize IPP component failure at time of device revision and stratify by manufacturer [American Medical Systems (AMS) and Coloplast (CP)]. METHODS: Retrospective review of our penile prosthesis database between July 2007 e May 2022 was conducted, identifying men who underwent revision surgery. Mechanical indications for sur- gery were categorized by location (e.g","PeriodicalId":23042,"journal":{"name":"The Medical Treatment of Epilepsy","volume":"11 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Malpractice\",\"authors\":\"H. Beresford\",\"doi\":\"10.1201/9781003066736-90\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in design, in fl atable penile prostheses (IPPs) remain susceptible to mechanical degradation with repeated use. We sought to characterize IPP component failure at time of device revision and stratify by manufacturer [American Medical Systems (AMS) and Coloplast (CP)]. METHODS: Retrospective review of our penile prosthesis database between July 2007 e May 2022 was conducted, identifying men who underwent revision surgery. Mechanical indications for sur- gery were categorized by location (e.g\",\"PeriodicalId\":23042,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Medical Treatment of Epilepsy\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Medical Treatment of Epilepsy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003066736-90\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Medical Treatment of Epilepsy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003066736-90","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE: Despite advances in design, in fl atable penile prostheses (IPPs) remain susceptible to mechanical degradation with repeated use. We sought to characterize IPP component failure at time of device revision and stratify by manufacturer [American Medical Systems (AMS) and Coloplast (CP)]. METHODS: Retrospective review of our penile prosthesis database between July 2007 e May 2022 was conducted, identifying men who underwent revision surgery. Mechanical indications for sur- gery were categorized by location (e.g